I checked what the Australian Republican Movement are proposing - their model is pretty much our current system except we get to elect the Governor General.
As it happens, I have an issue with the idea of electing a head of state - the problem is that gives the person elected a mandate and suggests that they would have a role that is more than merely ceremonial plus the reserve powers. So, we'd have a popularly elected head of the executive (because our prime minister is becoming more and more presidential in style, as people vote for the PM and not just the party) and also a popularly elected governor general / president. So, if we had another situation like the Dismissal, would the governor general be saying "I represent the popular will" and it's time for you to go?
I'd prefer to see the Federal parliament appoint the GG, which is pretty much what happens now in any case: the GG is/was nominated to our Sovereign and they always say yes to the government in power's choice.
That is actually how it occurs at present, and has been the case for a long time.






Reply With Quote





Bookmarks