Thread: Playing with ChatGPT AI

Originally Posted by DiscoDB

I asked ChatGPT why does the Land Rover 3.0 TDV6 snap it’s crankshaft and this was the response:

“The exact cause of crankshaft failures in the Land Rover 3.0 TDV6 engine is not fully understood. However, there are several possible factors that may contribute to the problem.

One possible factor is related to the engine's design, as the 3.0 TDV6 engine has a relatively narrow crankshaft that is under high stress due to the engine's high compression ratio and turbocharged induction. This stress can cause the crankshaft to fracture and fail over time, particularly if the engine is operated under harsh conditions or if it is not properly maintained.

Another possible factor is related to the quality of the engine's components. Some early versions of the 3.0 TDV6 engine may have been produced with subpar materials or manufacturing processes that could increase the risk of crankshaft failure.

In addition to these factors, some reports suggest that the issue may be related to the engine's oil supply system. The 3.0 TDV6 engine has a relatively complex oil supply system, and if this system is not properly maintained, it can lead to oil starvation and increased stress on the crankshaft, which can increase the risk of failure.

To prevent crankshaft failures in the 3.0 TDV6 engine, it is important to follow the manufacturer's recommended maintenance schedule and to address any signs of engine trouble promptly. This may include regular oil changes, using high-quality engine oil, and having the engine inspected by a qualified mechanic if you notice any unusual sounds or vibrations while driving.”

Technically not a bad answer.

At some stage you must have asked for more concise responses.

What is clever is the way ChatGPT can take a generic response and turn it into a discussion. The first answer it gave me also suggested a problem with the balancing shaft - so I had to correct and point out the TDV6 does not have a balancing shaft. It then restated the answer with no reference to a balancing shaft.

Now if the AULRO forum was added to its learning library then we would see some interesting responses.

Admittedly it would only be repeating majority type views and of course if misinformation is built into the library then it treats this as fact as well - but with guidance by a technical mod it could be corrected and learn on the run.

Yes. There was a Twitter AI that because racist when being “taught” by people interacting with it.

Twitter taught Microsoft’s AI chatbot to be a racist asshole in less than a day - The Verge

ChatGPT plus Social Media would be a disaster.

How ChatGPT can be easily manipulated:

AI fits here and also in Autonomous driving thread

Noticed a major person developing the Google AI did a bit of a dummy spit and left as he felt it is possibly dangerous.

We know AI or smart command and control systems have been in continuous development for ever! Yesterday a punter getting a flu vax phone rang with a sound I know very well. A Sonar PING I am not the first- 1490 Mr L Da Vinci put a tube in water and is said to have heard boats and ship noise! Dolphins, Bats and more used it before that! I called Doppler High, Torpedo inbound bearing 085.


We know autonomous ships and subs and weapons are here or coming soon to a Navy, Army or Airforce - think Loyal wingman perhaps? MQ-28 is a high flier.

"NEVER GIVE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE THE NUCLEAR CODES

The temptation to automate command and control will be great. The danger is greater.

"

I wonder if Mr Google AI was worried about that? A day is called Q-day for Quantum computing code cracking every code worries some! I wonder if we need a day for AI?

AI is both fascinating and subject for may science fiction films. Hal9000 ring a bell?

Skynet and the terminator comes to mind...

dundun dun dundun

If this works the same way as IT systems do at the moment it will figure out what the core 40% of the current process is and then say we have done the job. The rest of the process was not necessary which is code speak for too hard to do it or too expensive to do

Do we complete the job at this point or accept going over budget as the true size of the project was not properly scoped and hence underestimated?

Once something can be delivered incentive to complete tends to disappear. Is a problem for those who are left to use the system. Not just IT systems remember the business you outsourced to has no interest in your business or customers. They just want to minimise their own costs

Seen this too many times in system development or outsourcing. That could have interesting outcomes for your launch codes if use this type of automation