Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 28

Thread: They are doing something about the road!

  1. #1
    JDNSW's Avatar
    JDNSW is offline RoverLord Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    29,510
    Total Downloaded
    0

    They are doing something about the road!

    Access to my place is via about 17km of road from the bitumen that is maintained or perhaps not maintained, by NPWS. It used to be not too bad as long as you kept off it after heavy rain, but lack of maintenance and damage during firefighting in 2007 left some parts pretty questionable.

    I have spent a considerable amount of time and effort on correspondence with my elected representatives over the years, and have had a couple of wins over the years, for example, testifying in person to a Legislative Council committee resulted in improvements to the worst creek crossing a couple of months later. One of the major assets in recent years has been the promulgation of standards for firefighting access roads about five years ago. As this road is the backbone of firefighting efforts in this part of the forest, and clearly does not meet the standards, pointing this out helps. Latest communication from the state government via my local member was that the road would be brought up to this standard by the end of September, 2022. (I only got sent this from the local member recently when I gave the pot another stir recently.)

    Of course the wet weather over the last couple of years has not helped. About this time in 2018, I think it was, two fire trucks on an exercise got bogged on the road. They were there for about three months, and the mess that was made recovering them was only equaled by the mess made recovering the recovery vehicle.

    Then we had the rain last summer. I did not even dream of using the road for many months (I can get out through next door, but there are nine gates, a creek and a river that way!), but as it dried out and became usable (sort of) I find that it is in far worse condition than it has ever been in the thirty years I have been using it. It is barely passable to Landrovers. (My eldest grandchild brought her siblings up for the school holidays on Monday in their family's D2, but got me to drive it across the creek half a kilometre outside my gate.)

    Yesterday, on my way into town, I found a strange ute on the road coming towards me. They pulled off and stopped, so I did as well and talked to them. There were two men in hivis in the ute. They are starting work on the road, and told me that I would see more equipment further back towards the bitumen, and also gave me the UHF channel to call to ask them to let me past.

    Sure enough, further out, a hundred metres or so off the bitumen there was a whole collection of equipment and just off the bitumen about twenty truckloads of coarse gravel and several truckloads of rocks up to half a metre across.
    John

    JDNSW
    1986 110 County 3.9 diesel
    1970 2a 109 2.25 petrol

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    14,127
    Total Downloaded
    99.87 MB
    It looks like you're about to get your road! Hopefully they do a good job of it, especially so it is usable in the wet.
    Cheers
    Slunnie


    ~ Discovery II Td5 ~ Discovery 3dr V8 ~ Series IIa 6cyl ute ~ Series II V8 ute ~

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    NSW SW Slopes
    Posts
    12,030
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Good luck! Hopefully they'll do a proper job and break those rocks up a little too! A few years ago my RR got all 4 wheels wedged between large rocks sunken in the quagmire after the council had tried to make one of the bogholes on my lane passable. My mistake for stopping awaiting maximum height to clear the hidden rocks.
    MY21.5 L405 D350 Vogue SE with 19s. Produce LLAMS for LR/RR, Jeep GC/Dodge Ram
    VK2HFG and APRS W1 digi, RTK base station using LoRa

  4. #4
    JDNSW's Avatar
    JDNSW is offline RoverLord Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    29,510
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Talking to the blokes I met, it seems the large rocks are to do the bad creek crossings properly. I gather the idea is to build a causeway out of the large rocks so that they neither have a concentrated flow through, nor do they constitute a dam.

    The small stuff they have, presumably for the boggy bits, are a bit smaller than fist sized.
    John

    JDNSW
    1986 110 County 3.9 diesel
    1970 2a 109 2.25 petrol

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    The Hills.
    Posts
    19,161
    Total Downloaded
    152.79 MB
    Quote Originally Posted by JDNSW View Post
    Talking to the blokes I met, it seems the large rocks are to do the bad creek crossings properly. I gather the idea is to build a causeway out of the large rocks so that they neither have a concentrated flow through, nor do they constitute a dam.

    The small stuff they have, presumably for the boggy bits, are a bit smaller than fist sized.
    40 years ago, on a roadworks job in Qld, the large rocks were described as "energy dissipaters". I had to put some of them in, so I know why

    I don't think that is what was meant though.
    ​JayTee

    Nullus Anxietus

    Cancer is gender blind.

    2000 D2 TD5 Auto: Tins
    1994 D1 300TDi Manual: Dave
    1980 SIII Petrol Tray: Doris
    OKApotamus #74
    Nanocom, D2 TD5 only.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Bunbury, WA
    Posts
    2,507
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Larger rocks are often used for scour/erosion protection at water crossings. The larger stone size is more resistant to getting moved by water flows. Or as a base mattress layer in soft boggy areas. The large rock size bridges soft ground better and provides a platform to subsequent construction of top of it.

  7. #7
    JDNSW's Avatar
    JDNSW is offline RoverLord Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    29,510
    Total Downloaded
    0
    We shall see what eventuates! I will update this as appropriate.
    John

    JDNSW
    1986 110 County 3.9 diesel
    1970 2a 109 2.25 petrol

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    NSW SW Slopes
    Posts
    12,030
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by JDNSW View Post
    The small stuff they have....are a bit smaller than fist sized.
    Ah, little ones, not the 9"+ ones that I encountered.
    MY21.5 L405 D350 Vogue SE with 19s. Produce LLAMS for LR/RR, Jeep GC/Dodge Ram
    VK2HFG and APRS W1 digi, RTK base station using LoRa

  9. #9
    JDNSW's Avatar
    JDNSW is offline RoverLord Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    29,510
    Total Downloaded
    0
    There is a pile of them as well - some are in fact quite a bit bigger than that!
    John

    JDNSW
    1986 110 County 3.9 diesel
    1970 2a 109 2.25 petrol

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    The Hills.
    Posts
    19,161
    Total Downloaded
    152.79 MB
    Quote Originally Posted by Graeme View Post
    Ah, little ones, not the 9"+ ones that I encountered.
    The "energy dissipaters" I mentioned were considerably larger than that.....
    ​JayTee

    Nullus Anxietus

    Cancer is gender blind.

    2000 D2 TD5 Auto: Tins
    1994 D1 300TDi Manual: Dave
    1980 SIII Petrol Tray: Doris
    OKApotamus #74
    Nanocom, D2 TD5 only.

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!