Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 24

Thread: Toyo TDV8 versus Landy TDV8...

  1. #11
    p38arover's Avatar
    p38arover is offline Major part of the heart and soul of AULRO.com
    Administrator
    I'm here to help you!
    Gold Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Western Sydney
    Posts
    30,713
    Total Downloaded
    1.63 MB
    Quote Originally Posted by noddy View Post
    LRA's marketing efforts.
    They have a marketing effort?

    Ron
    Ron B.
    VK2OTC

    2003 L322 Range Rover Vogue 4.4 V8 Auto
    2007 Yamaha XJR1300
    Previous: 1983, 1986 RRC; 1995, 1996 P38A; 1995 Disco1; 1984 V8 County 110; Series IIA



    RIP Bucko - Riding on Forever

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Bayswater, Melbourne
    Posts
    815
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by noddy View Post
    Ian, I was not criticising, I just want to know why the things is not putting out more power/torque than the smaller Landy engine.
    I think I started off my saying 'In all seriousness..'

    Cannot agree more in terms of the madness of the 2.4ltr in the Defender and LRA's marketing efforts.
    No problems, its just that I dont understand why Landrover persist in giving the market something that will not sell as well as it could. I have driven the transit vans with the 2.4 turbo motor and it goes really well while it is on the turbo. Drop off boost and you are in trouble. Hopefully Landrover is not fitting the 6 speed gearbox to overcome the very narrow power band of the vehicle I drove. A motor twice as big will still pull well even while not on boost. I would like a new Defender but I doubt I will be happy with a 2.4 litre diesel and no auto.

    Ian

  3. #13
    dmdigital's Avatar
    dmdigital is offline OldBushie Vendor

    Gold Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Arnhem Land, NT
    Posts
    8,492
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by p38arover View Post
    They have a marketing effort?

    Ron
    The correct phrase is:

    The have a effort marketing
    MY15 Discovery 4 SE SDV6

    Past: 97 D1 Tdi, 03 D2a Td5, 08 Kimberley Kamper, 08 Defender 110 TDCi, 99 Defender 110 300Tdi[/SIZE]

  4. #14
    p38arover's Avatar
    p38arover is offline Major part of the heart and soul of AULRO.com
    Administrator
    I'm here to help you!
    Gold Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Western Sydney
    Posts
    30,713
    Total Downloaded
    1.63 MB
    Quote Originally Posted by dm_td5 View Post
    The correct phrase is:

    The have a effort marketing



    Oh, it's "an effort"

    Too bad they don't make an effort.

    Ron
    Ron B.
    VK2OTC

    2003 L322 Range Rover Vogue 4.4 V8 Auto
    2007 Yamaha XJR1300
    Previous: 1983, 1986 RRC; 1995, 1996 P38A; 1995 Disco1; 1984 V8 County 110; Series IIA



    RIP Bucko - Riding on Forever

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Sydney, Northern Beaches
    Posts
    917
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by amtravic1 View Post
    No problems, its just that I dont understand why Landrover persist in giving the market something that will not sell as well as it could. I have driven the transit vans with the 2.4 turbo motor and it goes really well while it is on the turbo. Drop off boost and you are in trouble. Hopefully Landrover is not fitting the 6 speed gearbox to overcome the very narrow power band of the vehicle I drove. A motor twice as big will still pull well even while not on boost. I would like a new Defender but I doubt I will be happy with a 2.4 litre diesel and no auto.

    Ian
    I think the 2.4 and updated facia was just a stopgap. They were never going to spend development dollars on sticking a new TDV6 or TDV8 into the current body design. LR needs to bring the Defender into the 21st Century, sharing platforms with their other products. In the meantime the current "new" Defender will do the job for the next three or four years.

    I think to compare Toyota with Land Rover is a tad unfair ... you should rather compare Jeep to Land Rover as they are the closest manufacturer in the type of vehicles they produce. By nature, people will flock to Toyota because it is a brand they are familiar with .. and feel comfortable buying. Most people would have driven a number of cars (most likely a Toyota) by the time they purchase their first 4WD. Few people take the risk on a big purchase to experiment with new brands, "the Corolla never let me down so I'll go for the Prado over the Discovery". That is why LR have a small but dedicated following.

    If you compare Toyota 4WD's to Land Rover, LR's are targetted towards the high end speciality market. That is where their marketing efforts are focussed. I constantly see LR adverts in magazines like Mens Health, Ralph, FHM etc. but seldom in 4WDMonthly. They sell the "exciting" features of their vehicles like the RR supercharger etc. I don't think LR expects to sell high volume like Toyota and I think that is why Ford ended up with LR is because they wanted to play in that market but didn't have a Ford product or the brand image to go there. I can tell you now if Toyota were selling 50 Cruisers a month they would make some major changes to appeal to the "mass market". Yes, that is what car manufacturing is about .. but I'm a consumer/car enthusiast and I believe there are some manufacturers out there that still produce vehicles for that market ..

    Another thing, don't be so bothered that LR are not selling high volume like Toyota. I enjoy the fact that I drive a farely unique vehicle and not another japanese washing machine. Not that I'm saying they are not very reliable and well built washimg machines ;o)
    Last edited by Greylandy; 16th March 2007 at 07:18 AM.

  6. #16
    numpty's Avatar
    numpty is offline TopicToaster Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Nundle
    Posts
    4,077
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Totally agree Grey Landy. Toyota build cars for the masses as opposed to the enthusiast. Case in point, the Corolla is a very good car, but oh so bland and boring to drive.
    Numpty

    Thomas - 1955 Series 1 107" Truck Cab
    Leon - 1957 Series 1 88" Soft Top
    Lewis - 1963 Series 11A ex Mil Gunbuggy
    Teddy5 - 2001 Ex Telstra Big Cab Td5
    ​Betsy - 1963 Series 11A ex Mil GS
    REMLR No 143

  7. #17
    p38arover's Avatar
    p38arover is offline Major part of the heart and soul of AULRO.com
    Administrator
    I'm here to help you!
    Gold Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Western Sydney
    Posts
    30,713
    Total Downloaded
    1.63 MB
    Whilst having lunch today, my wife was watching Dr Phil. He mentioned he has a "jeep" which he really loves - actually he drives an L322 Range Rover. Maybe he has a Jeep as well but I have noticed even British authors, e.g., Dick Francis, use the term "jeep"

    Ron
    Ron B.
    VK2OTC

    2003 L322 Range Rover Vogue 4.4 V8 Auto
    2007 Yamaha XJR1300
    Previous: 1983, 1986 RRC; 1995, 1996 P38A; 1995 Disco1; 1984 V8 County 110; Series IIA



    RIP Bucko - Riding on Forever

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    1,575
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Greylandy View Post
    I think the 2.4 and updated facia was just a stopgap. They were never going to spend development dollars on sticking a new TDV6 or TDV8 into the current body design.
    Yeah, fair enough, but a measly 2.4 with 90kW ffs. Surely they could have found something a bit bigger. It puts the Defender squarely at the bottom of the heap as far as power and torque figures on paper, which I agree are not everything but usually the first thing people will look at.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    South Sydney
    Posts
    1,084
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I constantly see LR adverts in magazines like Mens Health, Ralph, FHM etc
    What are you reading Henry?

    Back to the donk....apparently the Toyo is a single turbo, but still does not make up for the difference
    ____________________________
    Noddy
    - 'Kimba' ('02 Defender Xtreme 110)
    - 'Ari' (1994 Peugeot 205GTi Classic)

    "...we are all just earrings to the left of our parents, and they are all just haircuts to the left of theirs..."

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    The Vines WA
    Posts
    399
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Frenchie View Post
    Yeah, fair enough, but a measly 2.4 with 90kW ffs. Surely they could have found something a bit bigger. It puts the Defender squarely at the bottom of the heap as far as power and torque figures on paper, which I agree are not everything but usually the first thing people will look at.
    I expect virtually the first thing they will look at is fuel economy. Especially in Europe and the third world. If the Landy is streets ahead in economy while performance is good enough that will attract buyers. I'm convinced the TD5's economy has been a major selling feature of Disco IIs.

    From what I've read the 2.4 is a modified Transit engine. When I drove crew cab and LWB van versions of the current Transit a year or so ago I was pleasantly surprised by the on-road performance. Here's hoping the Defender model revision delivers too.

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!