Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 50

Thread: disco 3 vs RR vs RRS reliability

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    near Kilmore central Vic but work in Melb every day :(
    Posts
    359
    Total Downloaded
    0

    disco 3 vs RR vs RRS reliability

    ok
    the time has come to buy the wife a car (it's been coming for a while)
    Her B'day is coming up and I may as well get the brownie points & the new car (and save buying another presant)
    Rather than stall her another month, make her grumpy and have to buy a presant as well as a car (well it makes sence to me)
    So going to go all out and spend big bucks so this one has to last for a few years = 200,000kms without killing me on repair bills
    I've been looking around for the last month and for about the same money ($60-70k) I can get a 4 year old RR or a 2 year old disco 3
    (a RRS is more $ due to newer age and the higher new cost so probably wont happen although it's her fave)
    I know what I prefer (the big Rangie ) and I know pros / cons of the different models re features, functions, size ect
    but for purely relaibility, doing high kms anyone (esp those who work at stealers) have any feedback good or bad
    note they would be second hand (current shape) and DIESEL varients

    feedback appreciated
    thanks
    Jase

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Fairfield VIC
    Posts
    669
    Total Downloaded
    0
    no tech input (so probably not much help), but i'd go the RRS

    RRS = max browny points

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Douglas Park, NSW
    Posts
    9,347
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I don't really know too many high Km Disco3's. I think the highest I know is around the 80k mark & he's had no serious issues (TDV6). Suspension ball joints are getting to be an early wear issue on some cars.

    The LM RR's do have the front diff issue (which there is a fix for) & some auto's don't like high mileage. Other than that, the RR, esp Td6, has been pretty good.

    The plastic trims in both D3 & RR are a bit on the low quality side but I'm sure that's liveable.

    My pick would be the Td6 RR.
    Scott

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    near Kilmore central Vic but work in Melb every day :(
    Posts
    359
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Thanks Scosue

    [quote=Scouse;520361]I don't really know too many high Km Disco3's. I think the highest I know is around the 80k mark & he's had no serious issues (TDV6). was worried casue I didn't know any over that either at least i've seen a couple of RR at 150k (although not sure of how many dramas they've had to get there) Suspension ball joints are getting to be an early wear issue on some cars. hmm, hadn't heard that one before, are they expensive to fix? if just a normal ball joint at normal cost (not a LR special ) then no big deal

    The LM RR's do have the front diff issue (which there is a fix for)aware of the diff issue and a bit uneasy re cost to fix and fix reliability & long term ?? this for me is the biggest drawback of the RR & some auto's don't like high mileage. hadn't heard this one what do they do and how $$ to fix?
    Other than that, the RR, esp Td6, has been pretty good.
    thought the BMtrubbleU engine is pretty good
    The plastic trims in both D3 & RR are a bit on the low quality side but I'm sure that's liveable. noticed that on the few I've looked at but no real options, anway live with ok

    My pick would be the Td6 RR.this is my pick also the only real D3 advantage is the & seat option, current disco is 7 seater and while we only have 2 kids we use a 6th / 7th seat approx once a week so without it means 2 cars,
    I have heard of aftermarket 7 seat for new RR anyone know where / who ??
    thanks
    J

    [/quote]

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Adelaide Hills - SA
    Posts
    12,486
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Just been through a similar decision process. Ended up with a relatively high KM 2003 Range Rover Vogue HSE Diesel (100,000Km so not ridiculously high) for which I paid $58K. Actually my company paid for it....

    It is still under new car warranty which I used in the first week I had it to fix up a few minor things like the computer display with broken pixels and crazed paint on the door handles from too much sun. It is also still covered by Land Rover assist for another 18 months.

    It is truly a fabulous vehicle for cruising and going out and about. Pretty heavy around corners so it's no sports car, but gets up and goes very nicely. We went away in it for Easter. HUGE boot and back seats for all the gear. Highway cruising returned 8.9L/100 (over 400Km of mixed driving) and some dirt track driving returned 9.2L/100 which is brilliant.

    They are magic on dirt roads and pretty good in sand considering how heavy they are.

    Any more questions, just ask.
    Cheers
    David
    Last edited by spudboy; 12th April 2007 at 12:45 PM.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Adelaide Hills - SA
    Posts
    12,486
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Also - I forgot to say what a sweet engine the 3.0L straight six is. Heaps of grunt (for a diesel anyway) and miles better than my TD5. The gearbox is smooth as anything and being able to drive it like a "manual" with the tip-tronic is a bonus.

    Also also - I was very impressed with the level of service from Land Rover on the warranty issues. They didn't haggle and they even fixed something which I thought would have been a wear and tear item. Can't speak highly enough of of the good service they provided, especially after the general level of bad reports dealers usually get on this forum.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Douglas Park, NSW
    Posts
    9,347
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Ball joints - not overly expensive from what I've seen but wearing at 30-40k is a somewhat unusual problem that we see a bit of.

    Auto transmission - the biggest issue seems to be that they're "filled for life". A few around the 100000km mark have overheated the transmission badly. I'm sure that 40000km oil/filter changes would go a long way to help.

    Front diff - you've seen the fix (aftermarket, not Land Rover) ?
    Scott

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    near Kilmore central Vic but work in Melb every day :(
    Posts
    359
    Total Downloaded
    0
    below
    Quote Originally Posted by Scouse View Post
    Ball joints - not overly expensive from what I've seen but wearing at 30-40k is a somewhat unusual problem that we see a bit of. tht's ok I'm used to high maint I've owned LR's for the last 10 yrs

    Auto transmission - the biggest issue seems to be that they're "filled for life". A few around the 100000km mark have overheated the transmission badly. I'm sure that 40000km oil/filter changes would go a long way to help. not a bog fan of sealed for life autos (should be called sealed for "much reduced" life

    Front diff - you've seen the fix (aftermarket, not Land Rover) ?
    LR fix is just an alignment "tweek" isn't it?
    I've seen the US? aftermarket one with a second uni in the front,
    don't know anyone who has done 100,000kms on one but
    J

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Adelaide Hills - SA
    Posts
    12,486
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Yeah - mines done over 100,000 on the original front diff.

    I was a bit surprised seeing as it's such a big issue over in the states and I know someone else in Adelaide who's had a new diff at 40,000Km.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Douglas Park, NSW
    Posts
    9,347
    Total Downloaded
    0
    The alignment & greasing is good for a while, then the same problem rears it's head.
    They're up to version 8 of the bulletin .
    Scott

Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!