I have mudflaps on my 2a, admittedly a lwb, and they certainly collect a lot of mud, so I guess they do something. But none of the swb Landrovers I have owned have had them, and as far as I know they were never fitted to Series Landrovers new in Australia except possibly the Game.
However, I think you will find that current ADRs REQUIRE mudflaps on all vehicles if the mudguards do not go low enough, the only question will be whether these are retrospective. In general, ADRs are not retrospective, so I think you will find that they are not required on Series Landrovers since they were not fitted originally. However, it will be a vehicle defect if removed from any vehicle fitted with them originally, and probably becomes a requirement if the vehicle is raised or otherwise modified to increase the clearance of the mudguards. Anyone who has direct knowledge of the legal position, please confirm or contradict this!
Again, only looking at the lwb, I have had no problems with the mudflaps on either the 110 or the 2a as they simply drag on the ground when you use the departure angle, but are far enough from the wheels not to get caught when backing in these circumstances - I think of the first time I backed offroad in my new company Landcruiser in 1965 - no more mudflaps! This is likely to be a problem with the swb.
John


Reply With Quote
I have been running around without them for the past few weeks. I think they do stop a lot of crud etc flying backwards and in my case up into the back corners of the car but they are a pain off road when you catch them between a rock the tyre as rip off far too easily even if fitted very securely. 




Bookmarks