Reply With QuoteAndy
Are you the King?
You can tell us, we can keep a secret.
Super Moderator
And I thought that there were intelligent people around here!Originally Posted by 100I
Why are all the people with the purported "evidence" always aircraftsman 18th class or living in trailer parks, or was told to them by their deceased relative/friend? What. No one in a bar ever made up stuff to make them look good!!!
Where are all the scientists dispelling the myth and as has been said before, why didn't the Soviets or subsequently the Russians advertise the myth? And Why is it mostly people born after 1969 who dispute the landings.
The truth is - that it was really expensive to go there and they had enough soil from the place for all the research they needed to do. With the US oil crises and the ongoing Vietnam War in the 1970's the US cut the moon out of it's budget. It's been done and they can get more value from orbital space stations than trips to the moon.
Next we are going to hear about the flat earth.
That WWII didn't happen and didn't have NAZI concentration/death camps.
and that the 11/09/2001 attacks on the US were a Bush/Cheney constructed event.
Diana
Last edited by Lotz-A-Landies; 17th February 2008 at 01:10 AM.
You won't find me on: faceplant; Scipe; Infragam; LumpedIn; ShapCnat or Twitting. I'm just not that interesting.
OldBushie
Andy
Are you the King?
You can tell us, we can keep a secret.
RoverLord
I have to agree with you. A conspiracy to fake the moon landing would have required the complicity of so many people (NASA had tens of thousands of employees at the time, not to mention contractors' employees) that it beggars belief that it could be kept secret from, for example, political enemies of the then government.And I thought that there were intelligent people around here!
Why are all the people with the purported "evidence" always aircraftsman 18th class or living in trailer parks, or was told to them by their deceased relative/friend? What. No one in a bar ever made up stuff to make them look good!!!
Where are all the scientists dispelling the myth and as has been said before, why didn't the Soviets or subsequently the Russians advertise the myth? And Why is it mostly people born after 1969 who dispute the landings.
The truth is - that it was really expensive to go there and they had enough soil from the place for all the research they needed to do. With the US oil crises and the ongoing Vietnam War in the 1970's the US cut the moon out of it's budget. It's been done and they can get more value from orbital space stations than trips to the moon.
Next we are going to hear about the flat earth.
That WWII didn't happen and didn't have NAZI concentration/death camps.
and that the 11/09/2001 attacks on the US were a Bush/Cheney constructed event.
Diana
See, for example, Wikipedia's "Apollo Moon Landing hoax theories" and have a look at the discussion as well.
John
John
JDNSW
1986 110 County 3.9 diesel
1970 2a 109 2.25 petrol
YarnMaster
Ksssssshhhhh aaahhh houston we have a problem Kssssshhhhh .
There are incidents like this one, that could be very difficult to explain as a hoax.
Over 200 students witness saucer-shape object, physical traces left behind (Westall Incident) - Westall, Australia - April 6, 1966 - UFO Evidence
<snip>
Academic throws light on 40-year-old UFO mystery
The Age
October 2, 2005
Just what did flash out of the sky and into the lives of hundreds that April day? Stephen Cauchi reports.
A CANBERRA academic is investigating one of Australia's most compelling UFO mysteries, a sighting by hundreds of people in the Melbourne suburb of Westall on April 6, 1966.
More than 200 students and staff from two schools watched as the object landed in a nearby paddock, lifted off and vanished.
Shane Ryan, an English lecturer at the University of Canberra, is interviewing dozens of witnesses for a book he hopes to publish on the 40th anniversary of the sighting.
Mr Ryan, 38, was alerted to the events in the 1980s by a housemate who was there. Unlike most UFO sightings, the Westall object had a large number of credible witnesses. It was viewed in daylight and attracted a forceful response from police and the RAAF.
<snip>
Keith Basterfield Archive
<snip>
31 Aug 1954 Goulburn NSW
Lt O'Farrell was flying a Sea Fury aircraft, and noticed a very bright light closing fast from the "1 o'clock" position. The light crossed ahead of him, and continued to a position on his port beam where it appeared to orbit. At the same time he noticed a second and similar light at "nine o'clock" which made a pass ahead of him and then turned in the position where the first light had been sighted. The pilot contacted Nowra radar who confirmed they had 3 echoes on screen. The two bright lights reformed at "nine o'clock" and disappeared on a north-easterly heading. (1. Australian National Archives file number MP926/1 Control Symbol 3079/101/1 titled “Unidentified Objects (Flying Saucers sighted by Navy Pilot over Goulburn.) 2. Chalker, W. (1982). APRO Bulletin 30(10):7.)
<snip>
ChatterBox
Dude, what is it the stars, the reflections??I'd say it's infantile to try to pass off some of those poorly doctored pics..
.
Tell me and I'll show you why the debunkers know absolutely nothing about the moon, space, reflection, gravity, or even simple photography!
Super Moderator
And do we know who and when the pics were doctored?
NASA in 1969 or conspiracy theorists using Adobe Photoshop some other time ?
Diana
BTW: There is real genuine documentary evidence that it happened, just watch "The Dish"
You won't find me on: faceplant; Scipe; Infragam; LumpedIn; ShapCnat or Twitting. I'm just not that interesting.
ForumSage
Aww Dam. Now I'm gonna have to find a new planet to hide out on. Hope the next race I visit has their version of the Landy.
Master
George Carlin (american comedian) brings up a valid point in his book "when will jesus bring the pork chops"
"To my way of thinking, there is every bit as much evidence for the
existence of UFOs as there is for the existence of God. Probably far
more. At least in the case of UFOs there have been countless taped
and filmed and, by the way, unexplained sightings from all over the
world, along with documented radar evidence seen by experienced
military and civilian radar operators."
Why is it that people who believe in UFO's (from any of the billions of planets out there) are seen as crackpots, when people who believe in an invisible all-powerful being are seen as reasonable people
Not saying I believe in either, but I know which one sounds more credible.
Yeah!Why is it that people who believe in UFO's (from any of the billions of planets out there) are seen as crackpots, when people who believe in an invisible all-powerful being are seen as reasonable people
Not saying I believe in either, but I know which one sounds more credible.
Funny that
You may remember all the hype about the "Roswell incident", well, after one of the witnesses died, this happened.
"But last week came an astonishing new twist to the Roswell mystery - which casts new light on the incident and raises the possibility that we have, indeed, been visited by aliens.
Lieutenant Walter Haut was the public relations officer at the base in 1947, and was the man who issued the original and subsequent press releases after the crash on the orders of the base commander, Colonel William Blanchard.
Haut died last year, but left a sworn affidavit to be opened only after his death.
Last week, the text was released and asserts that the weather balloon claim was a cover story, and that the real object had been recovered by the military and stored in a hangar. He described seeing not just the craft, but alien bodies.
He wasn't the first Roswell witness to talk about bodies. Local undertaker Glenn Dennis had long claimed that he was contacted by authorities at Roswell shortly after the crash and asked to provide a number of child-sized coffins.
When he arrived at the base, he was apparently told by a nurse (who later disappeared) that a UFO had crashed and that small humanoid extraterrestrials had been recovered. But Haut is the only one of the original participants to claim to have seen alien bodies.
Haut's affidavit talks about a high-level meeting he attended with base commander Col William Blanchard and the Commander of the Eighth Army Air Force, Gen Roger Ramey. Haut states that at this meeting, pieces of wreckage were handed around for participants to touch, with nobody able to identify the material.
He says the press release was issued because locals were already aware of the crash site, but in fact there had been a second crash site, where more debris from the craft had fallen. The plan was that an announcement acknowledging the first site, which had been discovered by a rancher, would divert attention from the second and more important location. "
From: Paranormal Hunter: Roswell officer's amazing deathbed admission raises possibility that aliens DID visit
For that man to go to all that trouble, he must have felt very strongly about the "Cover up".
Cheers,
Posting Permissions
| Search AULRO.com ONLY! |
Search All the Web! |
|---|
|
|
|
Bookmarks