Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 33

Thread: Hi Octane fuel

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    3,451
    Total Downloaded
    0

    Hi Octane fuel

    Hi all,

    Noticed the III was running quite sluggish. By accident, I put in premium petrol, (only because the garage had run out of the cheap stuff.)

    Straight away, it seemed to run like the wind. The difference was quite remarkable. Is this just a coincidence, or goes the premium good stuff make such a difference.

    As a further experiment, I put in some Wynn Octane booster prior to filling her up today (which seems to make it run even better, if that's possible.)

    However, was then advised too high octane can blow the engine. Any thoughts?

    Thanks,

    Panda

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Foot of the Otways
    Posts
    3,030
    Total Downloaded
    0
    the higher the octane the more bang you get for your buck . I think normal ulp is 91, ethanol is 94 and premium is 98 . It does make a difference but for premium up pay through the nose for it and ethanol is normally 4 cents cheaper than ulp . Hope it helps

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Padstow NSW
    Posts
    4,501
    Total Downloaded
    0
    it could just be that your timing is out.

    cheers phil

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Avoca Beach
    Posts
    14,152
    Total Downloaded
    0
    the higher the octane the more bang you get for your buck
    I wish it were so!
    Generally Octane only refers to the ability of the fuel to resist "knock" on a test rig.
    The oil companies claim that their 98 octane fuels are more dense therefore give better mileage.
    This may be so, but I reckon would only be on an engine with closed loop feedback, which would lean off to 14.7 :1 or whatever is set, if the denser fuel showed a lower AF ratio at the sensors.

    Their claim of better performance only really applies to engines with knock sensors which retard if they hear knock. If they are fed high octane fuel, the computer advances to the maximum programmed extent if no knock is heard, thus giving better power and economy.
    An old engine is so crude that little of this would apply.
    In fact I found when I tried 98 in my 3.9 14CUX, that the engine stalled just before becoming fully warm, as high octane fuel is less volatile than low octane fuel.
    Regards Philip A

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Yinnar South, Vic
    Posts
    9,943
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by PhilipA View Post
    I wish it were so!
    Generally Octane only refers to the ability of the fuel to resist "knock" on a test rig.
    The oil companies claim that their 98 octane fuels are more dense therefore give better mileage.
    This may be so, but I reckon would only be on an engine with closed loop feedback, which would lean off to 14.7 :1 or whatever is set, if the denser fuel showed a lower AF ratio at the sensors.

    Their claim of better performance only really applies to engines with knock sensors which retard if they hear knock. If they are fed high octane fuel, the computer advances to the maximum programmed extent if no knock is heard, thus giving better power and economy.
    An old engine is so crude that little of this would apply.
    In fact I found when I tried 98 in my 3.9 14CUX, that the engine stalled just before becoming fully warm, as high octane fuel is less volatile than low octane fuel.
    Regards Philip A
    So you just manually advance the timing and make the most of the high octane fuel

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    3,451
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Thanks Phil,

    I have no idea what "closed loop feedback" is or "knock sensors", but I'm guessing none of this would apply to my basic 6 cylinder Landy?

    Thought it was too much of a coincidence, maybe it was just wishful thinking. I've also noticed it seems to run better in colder weather? Any substance to that do you think?

    Thanks for your input, much appreciated.


    Quote Originally Posted by PhilipA View Post
    I wish it were so!
    Generally Octane only refers to the ability of the fuel to resist "knock" on a test rig.
    The oil companies claim that their 98 octane fuels are more dense therefore give better mileage.
    This may be so, but I reckon would only be on an engine with closed loop feedback, which would lean off to 14.7 :1 or whatever is set, if the denser fuel showed a lower AF ratio at the sensors.

    Their claim of better performance only really applies to engines with knock sensors which retard if they hear knock. If they are fed high octane fuel, the computer advances to the maximum programmed extent if no knock is heard, thus giving better power and economy.
    An old engine is so crude that little of this would apply.
    In fact I found when I tried 98 in my 3.9 14CUX, that the engine stalled just before becoming fully warm, as high octane fuel is less volatile than low octane fuel.
    Regards Philip A

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    3,451
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I had the timing done a few weeks back, but will wait til Tony returns from the UK to do it again! I too thought it may have had something to do with the timing ...

    Thanks Phil

    Quote Originally Posted by discowhite View Post
    it could just be that your timing is out.

    cheers phil

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Yinnar South, Vic
    Posts
    9,943
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Panda View Post
    I had the timing done a few weeks back, but will wait til Tony returns from the UK to do it again! I too thought it may have had something to do with the timing ...

    Thanks Phil
    Advance it till it pings, then back it off a touch

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    3,451
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Hi Mick,

    I had a look at the manual which reckons the timing should be 2 ATDC with 90 octane, 6 ATDC 85 & 2 BTDC with 83. All very confusing. What's the difference with ethanol? I thought ethanol was the same as premium (yes, I know, showing my ignorance but hence I seek all your expert advice!)

    So what should the timing be set at for premium? Are different premium petrols (e.g. Caltex, Shell etc) all the same octane levels, or are some higher or lower?

    What does more "bang for your buck" mean? Does that mean it fires/ignites better?

    Thanks

    Quote Originally Posted by wannalandy View Post
    the higher the octane the more bang you get for your buck . I think normal ulp is 91, ethanol is 94 and premium is 98 . It does make a difference but for premium up pay through the nose for it and ethanol is normally 4 cents cheaper than ulp . Hope it helps

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Yinnar South, Vic
    Posts
    9,943
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Panda View Post
    Hi Mick,

    I had a look at the manual which reckons the timing should be 2 ATDC with 90 octane, 6 ATDC 85 & 2 BTDC with 83. All very confusing. What's the difference with ethanol? I thought ethanol was the same as premium (yes, I know, showing my ignorance but hence I seek all your expert advice!)

    So what should the timing be set at for premium? Are different premium petrols (e.g. Caltex, Shell etc) all the same octane levels, or are some higher or lower?

    What does more "bang for your buck" mean? Does that mean it fires/ignites better?

    Thanks
    Advance it till it pings then back it off, but inconsistancy's in fuel and swapping from premium to standard stuffs this up, the ultimate timing, is just before preignition, so whats in the book is a good "base" to start with, but not always the best

Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!