
 Originally Posted by 
PhilipA
					
				 
				I wish it were so!
Generally Octane only refers to the ability of the fuel to resist "knock" on a test rig.
The oil companies claim that their 98 octane fuels are more dense therefore give better mileage.
This may be so, but I reckon would only be on an engine with closed loop feedback, which would lean off to 14.7 :1 or whatever is set, if the denser fuel showed a lower AF ratio at the sensors.
 
Their claim of better performance only really applies to engines with knock sensors which retard if they hear knock. If they are fed high octane fuel, the computer advances to the maximum programmed extent if no knock is heard, thus giving better power and economy.
An old engine is so crude that little of this would apply.
In fact I found when I tried 98 in my 3.9 14CUX, that the engine stalled just before becoming fully warm, as high octane fuel is less volatile than low octane fuel.
Regards Philip A
			
		 
	
Bookmarks