Page 1 of 6 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 54

Thread: Toyota Prius vs Jeep Patriot fuel consumption

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Wonthaggi, Vic.
    Posts
    670
    Total Downloaded
    0

    Toyota Prius vs Jeep Patriot fuel consumption

    Just found this on the fifth gear tv website. Toyota Prius vs Jeep Patriot: the great MPG test features - Fifth Gear

    In short, they ran a fuel consumption test between the two cars over 160 miles.


    So, we decided to conduct the ultimate test, pitting the Prius (easily the world's biggest-selling hybrid with just over 1 million sold to date) against the devil's own tool; an SUV. Our choice of SUV was simple. Jeep was recognised in 2007 for having the most improved fuel consumption across its model range, and has won a Green Award for the Patriot. The Patriot Diesel is one of the most economical 4x4's available on the market today (thanks to its VW engine) and boasts lower CO2 emissions than, say, a Renault Scenic 1.6.
    Had we relied on the onboard computers, the Prius would have won by a landslide, as by the end of the trip they read 57mpg and 42mpg for the Prius and Jeep respectively.
    However, to get the real figure, we calculated consumption based on how much fuel each car had used over the 160 miles. The result was astonishing: both cars had used nearly identical amounts of fuel. The Jeep had averaged 38.9 mpg - only 3.1 mpg less than its computer had recorded. However, the computer of the Prius appeared to be telling whoppers: it actually achieved just 39.9 mpg - a massive 17.1 mpg less than it had claimed.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Tumbi Umbi, Central Coast, NSW
    Posts
    5,768
    Total Downloaded
    0
    A recent episode of Top Gear compared the Prius and a BMW M3.

    It won't surprise anyone who is a TG fan that they managed to create a test where the M3 used less fuel than the Prius. They just drove the Prius flat out round the track.

    It was good entertainment, but did actually make a serious point at the end.


    If you ever wanted proof that Americans either have no sense of humour at all or else they just don't get British humour, have a look at this article.

    Why Top Gear got it ALL WRONG in 'Prius vs. BMW M3' : TreeHugger

    They complain that the test was unfair. Well duhh!

    1973 Series III LWB 1983 - 2006
    1998 300 Tdi Defender Trayback 2006 - often fitted with a Trayon slide-on camper.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Wonthaggi, Vic.
    Posts
    670
    Total Downloaded
    0
    yeah i saw that one too. I found this more interesting coz it's a "real world" situation, and the prius still came out second best.

  4. #4
    mike 90 RR Guest
    Components that have been added for fuel economy

    isn't it strange that with the progress of computer add-ons ... Extra engineering breakthrough technology ... plus the 40 years difference between a 1968 Mini and a Prius

    Now what was the fuel economy of a Mini???

  5. #5
    mcrover Guest
    So in other words, I would be better off going back to a 120Y than a Prius if it was fuel consumption I was concerned about.

    Consistant 45 to 50Mpg out of the 120y driving the wheels off the thing.










    As much as you can drive the wheels off a 120y


    The coupe wasnt as good, twin webbers and a cam in a 1400 meant that I could only achieve 40Mpg on a long trip and 30 odd driving it like hell

  6. #6
    mike 90 RR Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by mcrover View Post
    So in other words, I would be better off going back to a 120Y than a Prius if it was fuel consumption I was concerned about.

    Consistant 45 to 50Mpg out of the 120y driving the wheels off the thing.

    As much as you can drive the wheels off a 120y


    The coupe wasnt as good, twin webbers and a cam in a 1400 meant that I could only achieve 40Mpg on a long trip and 30 odd driving it like hell
    The Prius is ALL ABOUT FUEL ECONOMY and as you just mentioned the fuel numbers from 36 years ago
    You can now see how conned we all are in their "acheivements"

    The 120Y ... I remember them ... Sit in the front seat to drive and your head was looking out through the rear door window to see whats coming left & right

    Yep .. they were big on space but were great to carve up & slip in a chevy motor

    Hang on ... Have a look at how Datsun 120 should really go like
    YouTube - v8 datsun 120y burnout

    Now theres progress!!!

  7. #7
    mcrover Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by mike 90 RR View Post
    The Prius is ALL ABOUT FUEL ECONOMY and as you just mentioned the fuel numbers from 36 years ago
    You can now see how conned we all are in their "acheivements"

    The 120Y ... I remember them ... Sit in the front seat to drive and your head was looking out through the rear door window to see whats coming left & right

    Yep .. they were big on space but were great to carve up & slip in a chevy motor

    Hang on ... Have a look at how Datsun 120 should really go like
    YouTube - v8 datsun 120y burnout

    Now theres progress!!!
    My Coupe could pull a good burn out.....and it had a tiny little 1400cc engine......and weighed 700kgs


    The Prius would be much better if you could charge it up from the mains grid over night rather than relying on the engine to charge the battery bank.

    The problem I see with Hybrids is the "you dont get nothing for nothing" principle.

    You will always make less energy through driving a car and charging a battery bank than if you were driving the car alone.

    On top of that, the extra weight and load from the electronics, the engine is working relatively hard all the time.

  8. #8
    mike 90 RR Guest
    MCROVER

    I actually don't think that manufacturers / want to / are doing the right thing

    You've seen the Full electrics being made via Porsche (Arnold Schwarzenegger drives one) plus that documentary on "Who killed the electric car" where GMC tested about 150 on the public then crushed the lot

    I think that there real main issue is that they can't bear to remove the dependence of the internal combustion engine

    To do that: then this would be the demise of the entire Auto mechanical market
    Mechanics , service stations , Auto parts , manufacturers , Aftermarket companies etc would all be unemployed /// Global!!

    The only industry that would survive is the electronics industry and to be a Auto spark would be in a very commanding position

    If you noticed, GM is on the verge of bankruptcy due to there shortsightedness of the changing market

    THE technology IS there .... They just don't want the Electric company to be the energy source

    Enjoy the full force of the mighty V8 while you can

    My thought's anyway

  9. #9
    mcrover Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by mike 90 RR View Post
    MCROVER

    I actually don't think that manufacturers / want to / are doing the right thing

    You've seen the Full electrics being made via Porsche (Arnold Schwarzenegger drives one) plus that documentary on "Who killed the electric car" where GMC tested about 150 on the public then crushed the lot

    I think that there real main issue is that they can't bear to remove the dependence of the internal combustion engine

    To do that: then this would be the demise of the entire Auto mechanical market
    Mechanics , service stations , Auto parts , manufacturers , Aftermarket companies etc would all be unemployed /// Global!!
    The only industry that would survive is the electronics industry and to be a Auto spark would be in a very commanding position

    If you noticed, GM is on the verge of bankruptcy due to there shortsightedness of the changing market

    THE technology IS there .... They just don't want the Electric company to be the energy source


    My thought's anyway

    The rest I pretty much agree with but what I have highlighted in red wouldnt be true.

    Cars have a lot more parts on them than just engines and gearboxes and a car cant be a car without wheels brakes and suspention.

    Im a mechanic on a golf course, I have had electric greens mowers that can operate on heavy load for 5hrs before needing a recharge and golf carts that can drive stop start for 8hrs before a recharge so the technology has been around for a lot longer than people realise.

    Electric forklifts and other transport and maintenance machinery have been around for decades and the only real changes have been in the control systems have gone from relays and variable resistors then to solid state electronics to computer controled.

    The parts suppliers etc wont be halmed other than the oil companies as they wont sell as much fuel and engine oil but companies that make engines and engine parts may have to look at making something else.

    As far as mechainics go, it is just looking at it from a different way, you send the rewinding jobs to the Auto sparky and you replace brushes your self, you buy the testing tools and do a bit of learning.

    Even saying all this..........I hate electronics on 4wds so as far as Im concerned.......I will still have my Disco but for the second car, I would do an electric conversion on the carolla......If there was one available

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Kippa Ring
    Posts
    1,665
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by mcrover View Post
    The rest I pretty much agree with but what I have highlighted in red wouldnt be true.

    Cars have a lot more parts on them than just engines and gearboxes and a car cant be a car without wheels brakes and suspention.

    Im a mechanic on a golf course, I have had electric greens mowers that can operate on heavy load for 5hrs before needing a recharge and golf carts that can drive stop start for 8hrs before a recharge so the technology has been around for a lot longer than people realise.

    Electric forklifts and other transport and maintenance machinery have been around for decades and the only real changes have been in the control systems have gone from relays and variable resistors then to solid state electronics to computer controled.

    The parts suppliers etc wont be halmed other than the oil companies as they wont sell as much fuel and engine oil but companies that make engines and engine parts may have to look at making something else.

    As far as mechainics go, it is just looking at it from a different way, you send the rewinding jobs to the Auto sparky and you replace brushes your self, you buy the testing tools and do a bit of learning.

    Even saying all this..........I hate electronics on 4wds so as far as Im concerned.......I will still have my Disco but for the second car, I would do an electric conversion on the carolla......If there was one available
    There probably will be a conversion for the Corolla soon. There is already a company doing a conversion for the Hyandai Getz, you supply the car they do the conversion. Performance doesnt suffer but it only has a range of 100 km, but advances in battery technology will change that in time. The drawback is the cost, $32000 but Hyundai will still honour the 5 year warranty on all the original components on the car.

    All these people that are bagging hybrid/electric vehicles dont have their minds open to the fact that they are a work in progress.

    The car that we drive today has had 100+ years of development whereas the more environmentally friendly forms of transport are relatively new.

    Imagine what advances are going to take place in the next 100 years.

    Not much use being a dinosaur, didnt work for them.
    John

    Series 2 LWB - Gone
    Series 3 LWB - Gone
    Series 1 LWB - Gone
    81 RR 2 door - Gone
    95 Disco v8 - The Next Victim

Page 1 of 6 123 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!