Page 8 of 13 FirstFirst ... 678910 ... LastLast
Results 71 to 80 of 126

Thread: Is Bigger Really Better?

  1. #71
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    2780
    Posts
    8,257
    Total Downloaded
    0

  2. #72
    350RRC's Avatar
    350RRC is offline ForumSage Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Bellarine Peninsula, Brackistan
    Posts
    5,502
    Total Downloaded
    0
    The popcorn must be out if we're now at the movies.

    cheers, DL

  3. #73
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Tassie/Perth
    Posts
    1,454
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by 350RRC View Post
    Hi vnx,

    I suppose what I was trying to get across is that I have a pretty stock RRC with a 350 in it. Gets driven everywhere every day. Has done over 200,000 kms since I've had it and probably another 200,000 kms before that.

    Has not broken ANYTHING in the driveline. Pretty reliable I think, and cheaper to run on gas than even a 200 TDI at the moment.

    cheers, DL
    Until you start towing or playing in soft sand

  4. #74
    350RRC's Avatar
    350RRC is offline ForumSage Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Bellarine Peninsula, Brackistan
    Posts
    5,502
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Hi CE,

    You must be talking about $$$$ rather than breaking things. You're right if that is the case, comparing my POS with a 200TDI. Gas consumption rises pretty quickly when towing 4 tonnes, but nothing broke in the driveline. I don't tow a lot of stuff very often.

    Haven't noticed any big gas consumption probs driving in sand. Maybe there would be if you had a 350 up front and were running the stock razor blade tyres, I don't know.

    cheers, DL

  5. #75
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    SW of Geelong
    Posts
    2,383
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by vnx205 View Post
    I meant it in the very general sense of the balance between power and economy(Isuzu 4BD1/T), simplicity(Isuzu 4BD1/T)and complexity, comfort and ruggedness(County/Defender), performance and longevity(Isuzu 4BD1T), size and space(County/Defender), articulation and stability(Any coil sprung Landy).
    I own or have owned and driven, 3.5 V8 auto RRC, 4.2 V8 County and I recently bought a '99 Td5 Defender, but for me, my Isuzu 4BD1Turbo in the County out shines them all. The Rangie is comfortable, but simply guttless for the amount of fuel it uses. The 4.2 in the County was a fantastic motor, plenty of go on the road and excellent torque down low off road, but used too much fuel also. I've only had the Td5 a few weeks, and I must admit I am impressed with the on road power it has for a little 2.5 litre motor (even if you do have to rev the crap out of it) and the fuel economy, but it lacks torque.
    The 3.9 litre Isuzu Turbo (intercooled) would give my 4.2 V8 a run for it's money on the road and as good as the 4.2 was off road, the Isuzu is better.
    Compared to the Td5, and regardless of it's apparent reputation as a 'harsh' motor, the Isuzu is more relaxing to drive, and you don't have to ring it's neck having an abundance of torque along with great fuel economy. And with 500,000 kms + between rebuilds (and that's when they've pulled 7 tons GVM all day, every day) it's cubic inches and no electronic crap for me.
    '88 County Isuzu 4Bd1 Turbo Intercooled, '96 Defender 130 CC VNT
    '85 Isuzu 120 Trayback, '72 SIIA SWB Diesel Soft Top
    '56 SI Ute Cab


  6. #76
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Safety Bay
    Posts
    8,041
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Say whatever you like but a daily driver that has 500k on it is a donkey.Don't let the big miles that trucks run up fool you into thinking all of them do it easily and how many times have any of you done that many k's anyway,probably none and that motor will cost more than you will want to spend come rebuild time. Pat

  7. #77
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    NSW far north coast
    Posts
    17,285
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by PAT303 View Post
    <snip>
    and that motor will cost more than you will want to spend come rebuild time. Pat
    always been the big disadvantage with Japanese diesels.....

  8. #78
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    4,684
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by F4Phantom View Post
    I dont think LR ever really thought about balance. BMW care about balance and the application of their engines, in fact they differentiate and sell their cars mainly on engines. LR on the other hand had a good car but needed propulsion and used the quickest and cheapest way to get this. In the end most of LR's engines are substandard but they did come up with the odd class leaders when they tried. The 3.5L v8 was shoved in everything they made for 30 odd years unlike bmw who make a new engine for every new car (just about)

    .
    Land rover do balance the V8 when i went to the factory i watched them do this .
    95 300 Tdi Defender 90
    99 300 Tdi Defender 110
    92 Discovery 200tdi
    50 Series 1 80
    50 Series 1 80


    www.reads4x4.com

  9. #79
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    SW of Geelong
    Posts
    2,383
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by PAT303 View Post
    Say whatever you like but a daily driver that has 500k on it is a donkey.Don't let the big miles that trucks run up fool you into thinking all of them do it easily and how many times have any of you done that many k's anyway,probably none

    and that motor will cost more than you will want to spend come rebuild time. Pat
    Quote Originally Posted by rick130 View Post
    always been the big disadvantage with Japanese diesels.....


    These engines do go the distance. I've heard of more than a few that have 350,000 to 500,000 + on them and I've spoken to a couple of guys with more than 750,000 on the clock......all of them in Landys and all still going strong.

    As for rebuilding costs, I have the receipt for the FULL rebuild on my 4BD1T. $6202 including rebuilding the injector pump and retipping the injectors, even removing and refitting the engine to the vehicle. Look up the list price for a Td5 injector, 5 of them will cost you more than my full rebuild. I even know of an injector pump from a 2.25L Landy diesel that cost $1200+ to rebuild.

    Cheers, Murray
    '88 County Isuzu 4Bd1 Turbo Intercooled, '96 Defender 130 CC VNT
    '85 Isuzu 120 Trayback, '72 SIIA SWB Diesel Soft Top
    '56 SI Ute Cab


  10. #80
    Bearman's Avatar
    Bearman is offline TopicToaster Gold Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Hay Point
    Posts
    4,043
    Total Downloaded
    0

    Smile

    Quote Originally Posted by PAT303 View Post
    Say whatever you like but a daily driver that has 500k on it is a donkey.Don't let the big miles that trucks run up fool you into thinking all of them do it easily and how many times have any of you done that many k's anyway,probably none and that motor will cost more than you will want to spend come rebuild time. Pat
    I have gotta say that I am one who has done 750k on an aftermarket turboed Isuzu 4BD1 and it cost virtually nothing in maintenance - replaced a couple of seals and had the injectors cleaned twice - both times they didnt need it apparently. Eventually it lost compression due to worn out compression rings but was still running pretty good just lacking power on hill climbs and accelleration. When it came time to rebuild I looked around and found a complete genuine replacement motor for $3500. I would't say that was an arm an a leg. AAAND it gave excellent fuel economy......
    I have also had a S111 that I converted to 351 Ford cleveland V8 with C4 auto. Now that was a magnificient machine. I put the earlier series low range transfer gears in (lower gearing), rangie front axle (with leaf spring mods) and extensions on my rear Salisbury axle to match the RR front track (made by Mal Story) and 3.54 diffs. Surprised many a toyo/****in nissan driver. I had a maxi locker in the rear and offroad/in sand hardly ever had to get in 4WD. The auto did all the work with the big cubes effortlessly pushing it. Was a bit heavy on fuel around 15mpg but that was in the days when fuel was cheaper and it didnt matter that much. The transfer box axles chassis etc all handled the extra grunt without any problems. Got a couple of pics somewhere if anyone wants to look at it....Bearman

Page 8 of 13 FirstFirst ... 678910 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!