
 Originally Posted by 
Tombie2
					
				 
				Ponder this one.....
 
Whats worse? (In your opinion)
 
170km/h in a 100km/h Zone?
or
95km/h in a 60km/h zone?
or
50km/h in a ROAD WORKS zone?
 
I sit back to see this with interest... This is not a trick question, rather a perception question....
Now back to the 170km/h one...
What is it about speed that everyone goes Ooh... No.. About?
Is 170km/h fast? Or is our driver training inadequate for those speeds?
Are our roads capable of it? Is a modern car safe at those speeds?
Whats worse? Fatigue over 4 hours at 110km/h or fatigue over 3.25 hours at 130km/h
You can imagine this goes around and around.....
 
Me, personally, although I havent done it for a long time...
I dont consider 200+ km/h fast - On the right surface, with good visibility all around (particularly oncoming) in the right automobile (a Landy doesnt meet this, Well a RRS might).
 
Many a time I crossed the Hay Plain at over $2.20 & I've
Done Perth --> Adelaide in 26 straight hours SOLO (you do the math) - No drugs were used either...
 
Better roads, better driver eduction, and lets remind all the morons out there.. A Drivers Licence is a Priveledge not a RIGHT... If you can't meet the requirement - You dont get a licence.....
 
 
 
Can you tell I'm bored at work tonight ?????
			
		 
	
Bookmarks