Page 10 of 13 FirstFirst ... 89101112 ... LastLast
Results 91 to 100 of 126

Thread: Would you Aussies put up with this?

  1. #91
    clean32 is offline AULRO Holiday Reward Points Winner!
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    SA, Newton
    Posts
    2,104
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Chucaro View Post
    With more than 45 years on the work force and living in 3 diferent countries I am very serious about it.

    If you do not like the unios go back and work more than 48 hour a week for a lousy wages, do not have more than 2 weeks holidays, kiss good bye to the safety on the work place, etc, etc.
    I was responding to your post about flicking the bosses and making collectives, nothing in your post or my post had any reference to Unions. But since you have decided to distort my post I will how ever comment. Unions have there place, Australia is certainly much better for having unions, but there must be balance. But the Fact remains. Unions are a business within themselves. So as you said “ flick the bosses” would also include flick the university educated 200K plus a year Union bosses, after all by implication they are just getting fat of your fees which is in essence just another Tax
    Quote Originally Posted by Chucaro View Post
    Perhaps would be better to to a crash course and wotk for a year in China in the places where the poor ex farmers work
    Crash course, In china you say, sure should I go back again for another 3 years?? Or was my previous 3 years not enough to satisfy you ? Or how about my 2 years in Russia, then there Laos, Thailand, Pakistan India etc, so as you are talking about Poor farmers I would have to say, I have seen a few.
    But by inclination of your statement you give the impression that China is full of poor farmers. Well there are a lot but as far as there population goes they are defiantly not in the majority. As you appear to be so concerned over the Chinese Poor farmers I would sagest that you only purchase Chinese manufactured goods, thus producing in your own way more demand. Inturn more factories until there are no more poor Chinese farmers but only Chinese factory workers. Then they can all learn to eat Australian Lamb and beef, even better why don’t we just Dam up the murry ( its stuffed anyway) and turn 1\2 of Queensland in to one big rice paddy. Then we could sell them all there rice as well, along with the 3 ships a day of compressed natural gas from WA and all the other natural recourses we can dig out of the ground. Sound like an economic plan to me ??

  2. #92
    clean32 is offline AULRO Holiday Reward Points Winner!
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    SA, Newton
    Posts
    2,104
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by shinz View Post
    I actually think this last paragraph probably says best what I was thought I was trying to say initially, maybe I'm being a bit alarmist, but with all thats going on in the world today, I'm wondering if the global community isn't looking a bit shakey & Brians musings even more relevant.
    Steve
    You have a Valid point in some respects, but current thinking is that any military action would be for a limited time period. There for Australian manufacturing or the protection of Australian manufacturing is also limited to a few select areas. Flip the coin over if every country was dependant on every othere country then the option for armed conflict would not exist.
    Having said that there have been some resent blunders. The first 2 that come to mind are. The Australian army getting its bullets from Indonesia. Not a smart move during the early days of ET. Or Indonesia buying some nice new fighters from the Yanks ( same time as Australia did) but they got a factory to build them as well, Australia got ficked off with a pile of second-hand rebuilt F111 that had spent the last few years sitting in a desert. But they were realy realy cheep.

    But even here the idea that a Holden factory can change over to making Tanks is really a joke. But to follow your real point and update it to today’s real requirements, is the retention in this country of Knowledge and a good level of education. These 2 in themselves would be our major advantage if we were looking at an invasion force running up some gold cost beach. Population is certainly not in our favour. We just don’t have the body’s to put under arms and into manufacturing and food production at the same time.

    As for the Global economy, its actually a bit stronger or more inter twined, dependent even. The Key to understanding the big picture is to understand the thinking’s and history of the best educated American President that the USA has ever had. Along with the passing out of the last of the ex military WW2 influences ( due to age) from American international politics. if you understand how the oil shocks of the 70s were managed, and how they came about and finally resolved. Apply that to today’s scenario abet with a few different players but the problems are the same, the solution is like the next phase. The hardest part for most Australians is to understand the current or recent global securities threat which has lead us all into this manufactured recession we have today.

  3. #93
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Nelson, New Zealand
    Posts
    93
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by clean32 View Post
    You have a Valid point in some respects, but current thinking is that any military action would be for a limited time period. There for Australian manufacturing or the protection of Australian manufacturing is also limited to a few select areas. Flip the coin over if every country was dependant on every othere country then the option for armed conflict would not exist.
    Having said that there have been some resent blunders. The first 2 that come to mind are. The Australian army getting its bullets from Indonesia. Not a smart move during the early days of ET. Or Indonesia buying some nice new fighters from the Yanks ( same time as Australia did) but they got a factory to build them as well, Australia got ficked off with a pile of second-hand rebuilt F111 that had spent the last few years sitting in a desert. But they were realy realy cheep.

    But even here the idea that a Holden factory can change over to making Tanks is really a joke. But to follow your real point and update it to today’s real requirements, is the retention in this country of Knowledge and a good level of education. These 2 in themselves would be our major advantage if we were looking at an invasion force running up some gold cost beach. Population is certainly not in our favour. We just don’t have the body’s to put under arms and into manufacturing and food production at the same time.

    As for the Global economy, its actually a bit stronger or more inter twined, dependent even. The Key to understanding the big picture is to understand the thinking’s and history of the best educated American President that the USA has ever had. Along with the passing out of the last of the ex military WW2 influences ( due to age) from American international politics. if you understand how the oil shocks of the 70s were managed, and how they came about and finally resolved. Apply that to today’s scenario abet with a few different players but the problems are the same, the solution is like the next phase. The hardest part for most Australians is to understand the current or recent global securities threat which has lead us all into this manufactured recession we have today.
    It wasn't so much the military aspect of the world I refered to, in todays conflicts, there is no place for citizen armies & make shift solutions, unless of course you a sunni or taliban extremeist. I was rather thinking of the lose of infrastructure if everything is parceled out overseas & the lack of opportunites to create & train into a skill base for our young, but mainly the need to retain a certain operating base within ones own country. Theres little point in having all your important functions & industries overseas in cheap labour third world contries if their systems could go "tips" up. I'm aware that in the pure model of globalisation we will eventually get to the situation where all nations are so codependent on each other that conflict, both commercial as well as military is virtually impossible but we're a generation or so away from that nirvana & I think it is wise for any nation to retain a basic strategic base of skills & industry. It fails to do this at its peril.
    Steve

  4. #94
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Brisbane, Inner East.
    Posts
    11,178
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by clean32 View Post
    But even here the idea that a Holden factory can change over to making Tanks is really a joke. .
    The manufacturing processes are exactly the same. Casting, forging, pressing, machining, welding, assembly. The skills required are the same and are in place as is most of the machinery. The jigs and fixtures will be new but the tool and die skills and machines exist. The factory areas would need much modification to accomodate bigger and heavier lumps, but not difficult. Abdul and Tran would still be standing on the line with their air tools just putting different bits on different vehicles. Look at what was achieved by industry in WWII in a relatively short period.
    URSUSMAJOR

  5. #95
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Preston Melbourne Vic
    Posts
    510
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by 303gunner View Post
    I remember in the 1980's when a pair of Levi's jeans was $80-90, when an American-made Apple IIe computer was $600, a Rank Arena 63cm TV was $1499 and a Black & Decker Drill was $159. Now we find Chinese made Jeans for $19, computers that are way faster than a IIe for $699, a 63cm LCD TV for $599 and a GMC drill for $14.99. And those prices are in 2009 dollars, not 1983 dollars. I don't know where you shop, but if you have not seen reduced prices or improved quality since the change from Tariff-protected "made in Australia" days to the current global economy, free trade days, then you've been missing something.
    I bet those $19 dollar jeans didn't have a Levis tag on them and if they did then they were pirate copies. How much does it cost for a pair of levis today? A lot more than $80-90 and they are most likely made in China I'm sure. As for all your other arguments you're comparing lemons and apples. eg. with computers, prices can drop dramatically due to the increased need and the ability then to mass produce. Try and buy a current apple laptop or desktop for $600 today. Most of their parts are probably built in china also but they don't cost less!

  6. #96
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Back down the hill.
    Posts
    29,779
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by XSiV View Post
    I bet those $19 dollar jeans didn't have a Levis tag on them and if they did then they were pirate copies. How much does it cost for a pair of levis today? A lot more than $80-90 and they are most likely made in China I'm sure. As for all your other arguments you're comparing lemons and apples. eg. with computers, prices can drop dramatically due to the increased need and the ability then to mass produce. Try and buy a current apple laptop or desktop for $600 today. Most of their parts are probably built in china also but they don't cost less!
    Last pair of Levis I owned were made in Fiji! Lasted less than 1 year, $19 specials now, just as good if not better.

  7. #97
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Preston Melbourne Vic
    Posts
    510
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by V8Ian View Post
    Last pair of Levis I owned were made in Fiji! Lasted less than 1 year, $19 specials now, just as good if not better.
    How much did you pay for the levis?

  8. #98
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Back down the hill.
    Posts
    29,779
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by XSiV View Post
    How much did you pay for the levis?
    I don't recall the exact price ($100 ish) but they were the same price as the real Levis. I didn't know they were made in Fiji untill I got home.

  9. #99
    clean32 is offline AULRO Holiday Reward Points Winner!
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    SA, Newton
    Posts
    2,104
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Brian Hjelm View Post
    The manufacturing processes are exactly the same. Casting, forging, pressing, machining, welding, assembly. The skills required are the same and are in place as is most of the machinery. The jigs and fixtures will be new but the tool and die skills and machines exist. The factory areas would need much modification to accomodate bigger and heavier lumps, but not difficult. Abdul and Tran would still be standing on the line with their air tools just putting different bits on different vehicles. Look at what was achieved by industry in WWII in a relatively short period.
    Rubbish, manufacturing a car now days is all about logistics. Open the box from china screw it on, open the next box and screw that on etc. The idea that casting or worse that Australia has the capabilities to cast ( Australia never has had) weapons grade material really is in fantasy land. I believe the biggest tundish in Australia is 60 ton, remove the slag etc I would take a guess and say the biggest casting we could produce would be about 10 ton and there would be no way that that could even get close to something usable as a Tank. Even the Navy has greatly diminished there passive defence ( armour ) and replaced it with active ( electronics). And before some one chips in, aussie frigates, most of what you can see on them are made in NZ.
    Knowledge and education as I said before is the Key.

  10. #100
    clean32 is offline AULRO Holiday Reward Points Winner!
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    SA, Newton
    Posts
    2,104
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by shinz View Post
    It wasn't so much the military aspect of the world I refered to, in todays conflicts, there is no place for citizen armies & make shift solutions, unless of course you a sunni or taliban extremeist. I was rather thinking of the lose of infrastructure if everything is parceled out overseas & the lack of opportunites to create & train into a skill base for our young, but mainly the need to retain a certain operating base within ones own country. Theres little point in having all your important functions & industries overseas in cheap labour third world contries if their systems could go "tips" up. I'm aware that in the pure model of globalisation we will eventually get to the situation where all nations are so codependent on each other that conflict, both commercial as well as military is virtually impossible but we're a generation or so away from that nirvana & I think it is wise for any nation to retain a basic strategic base of skills & industry. It fails to do this at its peril.
    Steve
    ok much more clear now, i agree. but what would you call a basic strategic base of industry. where i agree 100% on skills, but i think we would possably differ on what the skills would be

Page 10 of 13 FirstFirst ... 89101112 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!