The subject raised by the last couple of posters prompts me to ask a question which I believe is also related to the concerns expressed by the original poster.
How many people can honestly say that as a general rule they start at the beginning of a thread and work their way though before adding a post at the end?
I have the feeling sometimes that some people are guilty of just joining in when a thread has become fairly popular. They read the last couple of posts and then post a comment, oblivious to what has gone before.
Sometimes that leaves them looking like a dill.
If we could be fairly sure that people generally took the trouble to read all the posts in a thread, wouldn't that sometimes reduce the need for such lengthy quotes, including photos?
However, I am conscious of the fact that it is possible for someone to selectively quote a previous post to make it appear that someone has said something quite different from what they actually meant. I don't know what the answer is to that.
I am also aware of the fact that I might be misjudging people. It might already be the case that the vast majority of people take the trouble to read all of a thread before contributing.
I was becoming worried that this thread was beginning to be dominated by very short posts which might give a casual reader the impression that we aren't able to come up with ideas of our own and tend to just agree with what has already been said. I thought we needed a long-winded post to balance things.
I think the balance has now been somewhat restored.

Bookmarks