You mean the Large Hadron Collider?
I am not sure if I agree with your first point. To me the cartoon just demonstrates the difference between the scientific method and the method used by creation "science".
A scientist looks for the most likely possibility based on available data. A creation "scientist" will not suddenly turn around and say "on the balance of all evidence it appears our hypothesis was wrong and Charles Darwin was correct"
I am not saying that theistic beliefs and science are diametrically opposed, just that the former is usually based on belief rather than evidence, and the latter the best available data.
Scientists would be unhappy if we knew and understood everything. I waqs taught long ago that the first conclusion of any research should be: more research is required
This is all getting a bit boring...
Albert Einstein: "If we knew what it is that we were doing, it would not be called research"
Ben Franklin: "Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy" (I am assuming he meant the all great and powerful FSM here)



Reply With Quote


Thank you for that consideration your supreme majestic wonderfullness.
Bookmarks