Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234
Results 31 to 34 of 34

Thread: Tell me about Freelanders

  1. #31
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    18,617
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by 3toes View Post
    The early diesel was an old engine even then and not to be recommended.
    Not sure how old the basic diesel design was but it is good and solid and in Aust was the first in the landrover range to be electronically contolled. The engine was also the basis of the TD5 - a great engine.

    I would agree that the TD4 is a better engine but only because it produces 10kw more power and being commonrail is more high tech - not much else.

    So what is to be not recommended about the old L series - it is a good honest, exceptionally reliable engine that gives good fuel economy.

    Garry
    REMLR 243

    2007 Range Rover Sport TDV6
    1977 FC 101
    1976 Jaguar XJ12C
    1973 Haflinger AP700
    1971 Jaguar V12 E-Type Series 3 Roadster
    1957 Series 1 88"
    1957 Series 1 88" Station Wagon

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Knaresborough North Yorkshire UK
    Posts
    1,922
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Nothing actually wrong with the Rover L series diesel engine. Just that diesel engines went through a rapid improvement phase in the late nineties which is reflected in the TD4 engine.

    The L series was originally a Perkins small diesel engine which Rover picked up and re worked in the early nineties. The newer TD4 engine produces a vehicle with the driveability of a petrol car with a deicent fuel economy improvement. The older engine is a more traditional slow, noisey and rough diesel engine in comparison.

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Nanny state UK...
    Posts
    3,253
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by 3toes View Post
    Nothing actually wrong with the Rover L series diesel engine. Just that diesel engines went through a rapid improvement phase in the late nineties which is reflected in the TD4 engine.

    The L series was originally a Perkins small diesel engine which Rover picked up and re worked in the early nineties. The newer TD4 engine produces a vehicle with the driveability of a petrol car. The older engine is a more traditional slow, noisey and rough diesel engine in comparison.
    Absolutely... But that's not a reason to not recommend it!

    Sure the TD4 is a better engine but the older XEDi is still a very strong unit and relatively trouble free.

    I've had my XEDi for 8yrs. It's one of the originals, it has been flogged something rotten before I had it and it's still going strong. Frankly, it is one of the cheapest cars to run which I've ever owned.

    M

  4. #34
    Tracie82 Guest
    Hi I am looking at a 1998 Freelander, petrol...It has 190,000kms and had all servicing done too, very tidy and indeed fun to drive. Do you know much about these models? For what we are looking at getting it for a weekend away perhaps a few trips here and there nothing too extreme and city driving to and from work also.
    Any feedback is greatly appreciated.
    Cheers Tracie.

Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!