Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst ... 2345 LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 50

Thread: Todays VIP Land Rover Defender Drive

  1. #31
    solmanic's Avatar
    solmanic is offline One Merc post away from being banned...
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Maleny, Queensland
    Posts
    2,912
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by juddy View Post

    Interesting, the windows on the hardtop are different to those on Land Rover's website, and it has alloy wheels too...


  2. #32
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Douglas Park, NSW
    Posts
    9,347
    Total Downloaded
    0
    There was a mention early on the the Hardtop windows might change in actual production.

    The alloys are part of the Boost pack. I think the white one in Sydney had the Heavy Duty pack which included the 130 style wheels.
    Scott

  3. #33
    solmanic's Avatar
    solmanic is offline One Merc post away from being banned...
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Maleny, Queensland
    Posts
    2,912
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I find it a bit odd that Land Rover would change the hard top windows to something different to the 110 rear windows. It doesn't seem very efficient from a manufacturing point of view.

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Down the road from Sydney
    Posts
    14,702
    Total Downloaded
    0
    ok so what's different? the pic of the actual car and the one underneath the windows look the same to me
    Our Land Rover does not leak oil! it just marks its territory.......




  5. #35
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Gold Coast
    Posts
    6,078
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Glass is slightly bigger in height on the brochure one

    Rgds
    Pete

  6. #36
    solmanic's Avatar
    solmanic is offline One Merc post away from being banned...
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Maleny, Queensland
    Posts
    2,912
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Yes, and the corners on the brochure one are a little less rounded. The brochure example windows look the same as the 110 rear & pick-up behind cab windows. They are also pushed a bit further to the rear leaving more metal in the B-pillar.

  7. #37
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Gold coast
    Posts
    3,130
    Total Downloaded
    0
    God, they looked the same to me....

  8. #38
    VladTepes's Avatar
    VladTepes is offline Major Part of the Heart and Soul of AULRO Subscriber
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Bracken Ridge, Qld
    Posts
    16,055
    Total Downloaded
    0
    The hardtop has a higher waist line in the rear I THINK as its essentially the "ute" tray while the wagon window line is lower for better windows for back seat passengers etc. Of course I;ve been wrong before. Twice.


    I want a 110 DC ute, in red please. Please. PLEASE !!!!!!
    It's not broken. It's "Carbon Neutral".


    gone


    1993 Defender 110 ute "Doris"
    1994 Range Rover Vogue LSE "The Luxo-Barge"
    1994 Defender 130 HCPU "Rolly"
    1996 Discovery 1

    current

    1995 Defender 130 HCPU and Suzuki GSX1400


  9. #39
    solmanic's Avatar
    solmanic is offline One Merc post away from being banned...
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Maleny, Queensland
    Posts
    2,912
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Nope, the waist line in all Defenders is the same...


    Remind me never to get any design advice from you guys, you've just got no eye for details...

  10. #40
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Loganlea Qld
    Posts
    1,652
    Total Downloaded
    0
    My understanding of the Brisbane test drive is that it wasn't actually carried out by Land Rover themselves but rather by a 'driver training' company who were under contract. This possibly explains some of the personalisation of the models actually on display as I would assume that for insurance purposes, they would have been privately owned by the said Training Co. and specified to their requirements.
    My impression of the drive was that the vehicle itself seems to be a very capable piece of gear but the whole course was set out to highlight the "anti stall" function and not much else. Apart from one or two reasonably sharp drops and climbs, a pleasant drive in an average paddock.
    The only difference I really noticed, besides the pretty obvious comfort and 'ergonomic' advances, was that it would go the same places that my S2a would go but with a lot less input from the driver! (Minimal input actually, steer and pick any gear, and that is about it).
    It would be nice to own though, a good tow vehicle, lopes along at 100Ks at 2000 Rpm in 6th so should be fairly economical on a highway run (which is what it will spend 90% of its life doing). I dare say it would or should spend most of its city life in 5th and lower, but even that should be pretty good with the gearing offered.
    An extremely light clutch was the thing that struck me most and I must admit I didn't really like the lack of 'feel' to it but I dare say that is something that would grow on one with use.
    I would probably swap Hyacinth for a 110 crew cab.
    Regards
    Glen

    1962 P5 3 Ltr Coupe (Gwennie)
    1963 2a gunbuggy 112-722 (Onslow) ex 6 RAR
    1964 2a 88" SWB 113 251 (Daisy) ex JTC

    REMLR 226

Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst ... 2345 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!