I have a table here that I got off the net through an email that deals with total cost,, "Dust to Dust".
This equates everything from the drawing board, processing, manufacture, to the tip/recycling end of things.
This came about to shut some people up about how good the Prius was supposed to be. 
In 2005-2006, some 322 cars were anylised, and the Range Rover Sport, and Discovery come in below the Prius,, 

 An FJ Cruiser is just below them in cost,, but the Land Cruiser is well above total cost, 
 
This reprt was telling of the fact that the Prius, although cheap to run, was far more expensive overall to even the Hummer. It pointed out facts like the substance used to make the special batteries was mined in the U.S. and then shipped (by boat) to Europe somewhere, processed, and then shipped back to the U.S..
One of the biggest problems is the 50sq miles around the processing site, which is now void of any life forms due to the acid rain, so much so, that it is used by NASA and the like, to train their guys for something,,(not sure what).
 
So, as has been said by Dullbird and V8Ian, the longer a car can run for, the cheaper it is in the longrun. This is one of the plights with the Prius,, "short life span"....
So all these things should be taken into account when discussing your topic,,
 
			
		
Bookmarks