View Poll Results: 200Tdi/300Tdi or V8??????????

Voters
134. You may not vote on this poll
  • 200Tdi

    19 14.18%
  • 300Tdi

    73 54.48%
  • V8

    42 31.34%
Page 6 of 8 FirstFirst ... 45678 LastLast
Results 51 to 60 of 78

Thread: What's Better 200Tdi/300Tdi Or the Almighty V8?

  1. #51
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    NSW , Pennant Hills
    Posts
    3,477
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Haha Murray

    I only see one problem with your chart

    16.67 % + 56.41 % + 26.92 % = 100% of the people who voted .

  2. #52
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Kingston, Tassie, OZ.
    Posts
    13,728
    Total Downloaded
    0
    [QUOTE=Bush65;1140511]I'm with JC.

    I've had a few 3.5 litre and 1 4.6 litre V8, but change to diesel was inevitable.

    I've had 2 300Tdi, and still have 1 in a disco.

    I have a 4BD1T and it beats all the others - lay down misere.

    I have spent a small fortune (for me, and I expect for others here) on turbo and inter cooler upgrades to try and get acceptable (for me) towing performance from the 300Tdi's.

    I have spent a fraction of that on a turbo and inter cooler upgrade for the 4BD1T. Since the turbo cost me less than $1k (when exchange rate of A$ was much less than now) including shipping, I would expect for similar $$$ compared to chip and inter cooler upgrade for a TD5, my 4BD1T would give better performance.

    IMHO, on the road, the 4BD1T is not much noisier than a 300Tdi - not enough to concern me.[/QUOTE]

    Right on there John, I drive heaps of Tdi's, in both Defenders and Discos, and even a few we've converted into RRC's, and My 4BD1 turbo in my RRC is just as quiet on the highway, in fact i have very little soundproofing at all, a 3" exhaust and mudders and at 100Km/h it isn't any louder than when the 4.6 V8 was in there. It has more torque and uses half the fuel now

    Sorry about the hijack too Simon, but you DID leave the Isuzu out of the options

    JC
    The Isuzu 110. Solid and as dependable as a rock, coming soon with auto box😊
    The Range Rover L322 4.4.TTDV8 ....probably won't bother with the remap..😈

  3. #53
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Safety Bay
    Posts
    8,041
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Well I suppose we could get picky and say mass produced standard fitment engines,the Isuzu wasn't factory fitted except for the ones made here when the Perenties were built,they are no different than the South African BMW models,they are locally built CKD vehicles with a locally supplied engine.The Poll really is about original fitment LR engines. Pat

  4. #54
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Yinnar South, Vic
    Posts
    9,943
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by PAT303 View Post
    Well I suppose we could get picky and say mass produced standard fitment engines,the Isuzu wasn't factory fitted except for the ones made here when the Perenties were built,they are no different than the South African BMW models,they are locally built CKD vehicles with a locally supplied engine.The Poll really is about original fitment LR engines. Pat
    But we don't live in seff Effrica

  5. #55
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    VIC
    Posts
    3,536
    Total Downloaded
    0
    You can't compare them on the merits of both being four cyl diesel engines. One has almost two times the displacement! Of course its going to put more down.

    I'm interest in what others think of Isuzu vehicles. Good experiences with an old TF have made me consider a Jackaroo if ever the need arose.

  6. #56
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    'The Creek' Captain Creek, QLD
    Posts
    3,724
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Disco_owner View Post
    Haha Murray

    I only see one problem with your chart

    16.67 % + 56.41 % + 26.92 % = 100% of the people who voted .
    Semantics present no obstacle for those blessed with a 4BD1T Isuzu.

  7. #57
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Safety Bay
    Posts
    8,041
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by B92 8NW View Post
    You can't compare them on the merits of both being four cyl diesel engines. One has almost two times the displacement! Of course its going to put more down.

    I'm interest in what others think of Isuzu vehicles. Good experiences with an old TF have made me consider a Jackaroo if ever the need arose.
    The company I used to work for had Isuzu trucks and they are without doubt the worst riding POS I've ever driven in,not only that they used fuel like there's no tomorrow as they are redlining at 115 K's/Hr so thier too undergeared and the bodies were falling to bits no doubt because of the harsh ride.I also had a 3.0TD Rodeo and to say it's slow is an understatement,how isuzu can get so little performance out of an engine is quite an achievement,you need a run up to overtake a kid on a BMX bike and it had constant MAF issues that drove me and the others that used it up the wall so it was ditched for a Hilux,that then got recalled twice!!!!. Pat

  8. #58
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Close enough to their Shire to smell the dirty Hobbit feet
    Posts
    8,059
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Bush65 View Post
    Semantics present no obstacle for those blessed with a 4BD1T Isuzu.

    This does represent my driving style

  9. #59
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    WA
    Posts
    13,786
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by PAT303 View Post
    Well I suppose we could get picky and say mass produced standard fitment engines,the Isuzu wasn't factory fitted except for the ones made here when the Perenties were built,they are no different than the South African BMW models,they are locally built CKD vehicles with a locally supplied engine.The Poll really is about original fitment LR engines. Pat
    Define "mass produced" and "standard fitment"

    Land Rovers with the ISUZU engine were "mass produced" by Jaguar Rover Australia from 1982-1990. The ISUZU engine was "standard fitment" to land rovers during this period.

    Note the engine was fitted a few years before the perenties came on the scene.

    The above excludes the perenties - of which about 3000 were produced between 1985 and 1995.

  10. #60
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    St Helena,Melbourne
    Posts
    16,777
    Total Downloaded
    1.13 MB
    Quote Originally Posted by Vern View Post
    426 hemi?
    No, Ford 427 SOHC or boss 429.
    MY08 TDV6 SE D3- permagrin ooh yeah
    2004 Jayco Freedom tin tent
    1998 Triumph Daytona T595
    1974 VW Kombi bus
    1958 Holden FC special sedan

Page 6 of 8 FirstFirst ... 45678 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!