Page 3 of 8 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 79

Thread: Disco 4 V Landcruiser 200

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Heathcote Junction
    Posts
    1,155
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I drove one recently as well.
    Must admit it drove well & this one did not have KDSS.
    The only thing I think it does better is sheer grunt.
    The owner made a point of me not having standard bluetooth although this has been addressed in the D4.

    Apart form being Landrover biased I would not have bought one as his 2 year old LC200 cost significantly more than my 09 demo D3.

    Regards

    Chuck

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Queensland
    Posts
    7,904
    Total Downloaded
    0
    It’s amazing the number of times I’ve heard women say the D4 is ugly but the instant they get behind the wheel, you need a crowbar to get them out again.

    My wife went from a then new Astra to a D3, she wanted the D3 because it was easier to drive and had far better vision all round, particularly when parking.

    She reckons the D4 is just that much better again.

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Mount Martha
    Posts
    1,399
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Hi all, just thought I would let you know the overall dimensions (as per owners manuals) of the LC 200 V the D4.
    Compared to the D4, the LC200 is: -
    112mm longer
    52mm narrower
    35mm shorter in the wheelbase
    15mm shorter in height
    Rear track - 22mm wider
    Front track - 35mm wider
    Weight - 137Kg heavier
    Goes to show that although the LC200 appears so much bigger than the Disco, in actual fact is is slightly longer and thats about it.

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Torres Straits
    Posts
    3,503
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Hmmm,
    just got back from a weekend camping fishing etc etc.

    750km total including about 450km of Cape Development Road, 150km of bitimen, 100km station tracks, 50km of soft sand (20psi all round).

    I drove the cruiser a bit - drives like a camry or a corolla - i hate that!
    but the point of my ramble...

    Defender 130 - 80ish litres.
    Cruiser 200 V8 diesel - 140ish litres. (Cruiser goes quicker but burns the dieso)

    S
    '95 130 dual cab fender (gone to a better universe)
    '10 130 dual cab fender (getting to know it's neurons)

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    The new Gold Coast, after ocean rises,Queensland
    Posts
    13,204
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I know a guy with a 200 v8, and he admits to getting average 26ltrs/100km, he tows a few boats regularly.....but he at least admits its fuel usage. he had a mitsubishi b4 that just couldnt do the job.

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    557
    Total Downloaded
    0

    Exclamation

    Quote Originally Posted by Disco4SE View Post
    Hi all, just thought I would let you know the overall dimensions (as per owners manuals) of the LC 200 V the D4.
    Compared to the D4, the LC200 is: -
    52mm narrower

    Goes to show that although the LC200 appears so much bigger than the Disco, in actual fact is is slightly longer and thats about it.
    I went to check this out. The LC200's exterior dimensions are 1970mm width. The width of the D4 (excluding mirrors) is 2022mm.

    Wow, the D4 is indeed wider than the LC200. When seated inside the vehicle, it just seemed narrower than the LC200.
    Last edited by tempestv8; 9th May 2010 at 09:48 PM. Reason: Clarification

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Mount Martha
    Posts
    1,399
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Hi tempestv8, the size thing is wierd isn't it. I read somewhere a while ago how Landrover had designed the Disco so that it looks smaller than it really is so that it appeals to a wider market.
    I think that they have made better use of the interior space as well.
    The rear of the wagon area is bigger than the LC100 yet seems smaller when looking from one to the other.
    BTW: The Northern Territory bought 60 D3's last year to replace the LC.

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    2,622
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by tempestv8 View Post
    I went to check this out. The LC200's exterior dimensions are 1970mm width. The width of the D4 (excluding mirrors) is 2022mm.

    Wow, the D4 is indeed wider than the LC200. When seated inside the vehicle, it just seemed narrower than the LC200.
    That is very deceiving !

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    557
    Total Downloaded
    0

    Post

    I am quite perplexed by how the D4's exterior width can be wider than the LC200 yet the interior width dimensions are less.

    From what I have found via manufacturers' website:

    Width:
    D4 exterior: 79.6 in
    D4 interior: 48.6 in (cargo area)

    LC200 exterior: 77.6 in
    LC200 interior: 59.8 in (seat width area)

    I couldn't find dimensions of the width of the seating area for the D4, only the cargo area, as noted above.

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Mount Martha
    Posts
    1,399
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Hi tempestV8, The internal maeasurement in between arm rests on a D4 is 1400mm. Your measurement of 48.6 inches equates to 1234mm.
    According to your calculations the LC is 1519mm. A difference in width of 119mm. I will check it out today as a mate has a LC200.
    I know that the LC100 was only 30mm wider.

Page 3 of 8 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!