I have been following both posts regarding the development of each bar, but what I can't seem to gauge is whats the best choice in peoples opinion who have used (and abused) the bars?
I have not used either before as I have not had the vehicle to suit.
All comments would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Royce
I second Craig's thoughts. ECB was first on the scene, but I have to admit it is the ugly duckling version. I've had ARBs on several cars and they've always been a quality build. I'm not sure but it sounds like the ECB might be a bit pricier.
Regards, Ron
PS: Hey Craig, towed a chocked-up 8x5 trailer the other day up the Hume - didn't even know it was attached!. Round trip (out - full, in - empty) I averaged 10.0 l/100 - MUCH better than I got with the Cruiser.
 Wizard
					
					
						Subscriber
					
					
						Wizard
					
					
						SubscriberI think you would be hard pushed to put the quality of construction of one over the other. It comes down to looks, and if you are not mounting a winch, alloy against steel for weight and corrosion resistance. If at all possible, it is a good idea to see the bars in real life, before making a decision.
D4 2.7litre
Hi LeaRoy,
The 4X4 Australia mag this month has a bull bar comparo in it, quite a good article, covers both the ECB and the ARB bars, plus a couple of industrial strength five post models that can take a roo a 500 klms / hr but have an approach angle only suitable for a speed bump, and also require a suspension upgrade, nuff said. Have a read.
| Search AULRO.com ONLY! | Search All the Web! | 
|---|
|  |  | 
Bookmarks