Page 5 of 10 FirstFirst ... 34567 ... LastLast
Results 41 to 50 of 100

Thread: The Discovery 4 is a second rate tow vehicle

  1. #41
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Alstonville NSW
    Posts
    469
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by brad72 View Post
    Would i be wrong in saying that a WDH mearly (used as a loose term) bandaids wrong suspension type, badly loaded car or incorrect tongue weight that is outside the vehicle manufacturers specs?

    But is saying that not many of us have access to a nose weight indicator to ensure everthing is loaded correctly every time we change something to ensure correct driving charateristics.
    Yep I think you are wrong.

    Not sure what all the concern is here as a D4 is a whole lot different to a Prado on coils with supplementary coilrite in spring air bags. I doubt too may in the caravan post know anything of D4 suspensions and would not be having their discussion with a D4 suspension in mind. That prado should have a WDH with anything other than a very light van but a D4 (with 4 post electronic air bags) should not, end of story. True the D4 can not lever weight onto the front but it will be good enough so long as the driver understands the limitations of the rig. And before anyone gets sensitive about the use of the word "limitations" in a D4 post, all rigs have limitations. It just happens that a limitation of a D4 suspension is that it does not suit a WDH.

  2. #42
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Safety Bay
    Posts
    8,041
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Maybe what we really need is for a D4 owner to sit his front wheels on a wieght bridge and hitch/unhitch a van and see for sure without guess work what the load is on the front wheels. Pat

  3. #43
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Gladstone
    Posts
    1,086
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by PAT303 View Post
    Maybe what we really need is for a D4 owner to sit his front wheels on a wieght bridge and hitch/unhitch a van and see for sure without guess work what the load is on the front wheels. Pat
    When I get a chance I will do this.

    I need to see what our van weighs now that it is setup in full trip mode.

  4. #44
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Gold Coast
    Posts
    3,775
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by John W View Post
    Yep I think you are wrong.

    Not sure what all the concern is here as a D4 is a whole lot different to a Prado on coils with supplementary coilrite in spring air bags. I doubt too may in the caravan post know anything of D4 suspensions and would not be having their discussion with a D4 suspension in mind.

    That prado should have a WDH with anything other than a very light van but a D4 (with 4 post electronic air bags) should not, end of story. True the D4 can not lever weight onto the front but it will be good enough so long as the driver understands the limitations of the rig. And before anyone gets sensitive about the use of the word "limitations" in a D4 post, all rigs have limitations. It just happens that a limitation of a D4 suspension is that it does not suit a WDH.
    In actual fact these people on the other sites are spending quite a bit of time bagging D3/4's suspension as being rubbish and badly designed because it doesn't use a WDH. But they are also comparing D3/4's as being 'lightweight tow vehicles' unlike Patrols and Crusiers which they consider as heavyweight tow vehicles. The big joke is most diesel Patrols are auto's so can only tow legally 2.5 ton, yet they often decide to ignore this fact.

    Is it a limitation for D3/4 not to have a WDH? I would say it was if the suspension isn't designed properly and the vehicle operated better with one, but there is nothing to show that this is the case. So if that is the case then it is not a limitation.

    cheers,
    Terry
    Cheers,
    Terry

    D1 V8 (Gone)
    D2a HSE V8 (Gone)
    D3 HSE TDV6 (Unfortunately Gone)
    D4 V8

  5. #45
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Caloundra, QLD
    Posts
    59
    Total Downloaded
    0

    D4 Weight and Balance!

    Pat303 asked for some figures, and I just happen to have some available. Hope they suffice?
    New D4, with full fuel, and driver weight at 80Kgs, I put the vehicle on our local Weighbridge. Axle figures were:-
    Front_ _ _1.320.
    Rear_ _ _ 1.340.
    This gives a Kerb Weight of 2.660, which is 77 kgs over the book of 2.583, don't know why this was so?
    We are presently approaching the end of our first trip, and with a heavy Caravan hitched up. and at the beginning, I put the whole rig, all loaded up, on the Weighbridge again. These are the figures, but now the car has the addition of, ARB steel Bull Bar, LR Cargo Barrier, Floor mats, 3" S/Steel side tubes, 18" Rims.

    GCM 6.10. ie; GVM + ATM.
    GTM 2.90 this is discounting the Ball Weight.
    ATM 3.20 this is total mass, including Ball Weight.
    Ball Weight .30.
    D4 GVM, unhitched, 2.90.
    D4 hitched, including ball weight 3.20.
    Front Axle 1.26.
    Rear Axle 1.94.
    Although the D4 was 40 kgs below limit, hitched up, the rear axle was over the top by 85 kgs, so I had to make a few changes to loading before proceeding further.
    All in all, these figures have given me 'Food for Thought' regarding safe, and legal loading of the 'Combination'. Maybe I should not carry the 60 Lts of Diesel on the drawbar. This would reduce Ball Weight, which would take a bit off the vehicle, and also the Caravan.
    Interesting to note that, although the Bull Bar is supposed to add 35 kgs to front axle and with my 60 kgs wife, plus cargo on the rear seats, adding a slight bit to front loading, that the 300 kgs Ball Weight lifts 60 kgs off the front loading.
    Pick through these figures Guys, somebody else's slant would be appreciated.
    Don.

  6. #46
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Alstonville NSW
    Posts
    469
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by TerryO View Post
    In actual fact these people on the other sites are spending quite a bit of time bagging D3/4's suspension as being rubbish and badly designed because it doesn't use a WDH. But they are also comparing D3/4's as being 'lightweight tow vehicles' unlike Patrols and Crusiers which they consider as heavyweight tow vehicles. The big joke is most diesel Patrols are auto's so can only tow legally 2.5 ton, yet they often decide to ignore this fact.

    Is it a limitation for D3/4 not to have a WDH? I would say it was if the suspension isn't designed properly and the vehicle operated better with one, but there is nothing to show that this is the case. So if that is the case then it is not a limitation.

    cheers,
    Terry
    Thanks Terry I admit that I did not read more than the first couple of pages of the posts. If they are bagging the D4 then they are fools. I would still argue though that if the electronic controlled D4 suspension could handle a WDH then it would be an added advantage but that does not take anything away from the fact that a D4 is more than adequate with a big van.

  7. #47
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Brisbane West
    Posts
    7,372
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Thanks Don. Excellent post mate.

    So it's settled then that auto controlled bags still allow substantial weight to come off the front wheels (with negative effects on braking in particular) and only a wDh (if it could be used in this case) would be able to lever the weight back onto the front?

    Perhaps the caravan forum blokes when talking about the cruiser being a heavyweight tower were talking of them cruisers weight - more the merrier. The kerb weight on any of these big wagons is not an issue at lower levels but at over 3k say every bit of extra kg of the tow vehicle is a good thing.



    Cheers

  8. #48
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Ellendale Tasmania.
    Posts
    12,986
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by ozscott View Post
    Thanks Don. Excellent post mate.

    So it's settled then that auto controlled bags still allow substantial weight to come off the front wheels (with negative effects on braking in particular) and only a wDh (if it could be used in this case) would be able to lever the weight back onto the front?

    Perhaps the caravan forum blokes when talking about the cruiser being a heavyweight tower were talking of them cruisers weight - more the merrier. The kerb weight on any of these big wagons is not an issue at lower levels but at over 3k say every bit of extra kg of the tow vehicle is a good thing.





    Cheers
    Personnally I'm not convinced a WDH will put weight back onto the front axle as much as they are reported too, There is still all that weight over the back axle..

    Would be interested to see (as an excample only) a WDH attached to the D4 above and the same test preformed again, that would convince me once and for all.

    Or a comparitive test using a different vehicle.

    Anyone got a WDH they can lend

    Baz.
    Cheers Baz.

    2011 Discovery 4 SE 2.7L
    1990 Perentie FFR EX Aust Army
    1967 Series IIa 109 (Farm Truck)
    2007 BMW R1200GS
    1979 BMW R80/7
    1983 BMW R100TIC Ex ACT Police
    1994 Yamaha XT225 Serow

  9. #49
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Safety Bay
    Posts
    8,041
    Total Downloaded
    0
    That would give a definitive answer as to wether a WDH did lever weight forward,if it did it'll be a know brainer as to why they rip towbars off. Pat

  10. #50
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    NSW SW Slopes
    Posts
    12,033
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Redback View Post
    Would be interested to see (as an excample only) a WDH attached to the D4 above and the same test preformed again, that would convince me once and for all.
    A 4WD mag some time ago did a tow test with several vehicles. They fitted a WDH to each vehicle including a D3, although they had to play around with the D3's adjustment to get the setup to ride properly and not compete with the air suspension. I suspect the WDH provided only a small transfer from the rear wheels because of conflicts with the air suspension's levelling if too much weight was tried to be lifted off the rear. The tow test was not repeated without a WDH because the assumption was that it was best to have a WDH fitted.

    A WDH on the D4 could interfere with trailer stability assist's ability to detect and correct sway, along with the usual disadvantage when travelling over ruts and affecting ride height thus could compete with the supension's desire to self-level. The minimal weight transfer from the front even with the maximum ball weight is a small enough percentage of the D3/4's front axle weight that I'd expect it to be inconsequental. The air suspension will keep the vehicle at its normal ride height all round and the suspension geometry will therefore be normal, unlike vehicles with steel springs.
    MY21.5 L405 D350 Vogue SE with 19s. Produce LLAMS for LR/RR, Jeep GC/Dodge Ram
    VK2HFG and APRS W1 digi, RTK base station using LoRa

Page 5 of 10 FirstFirst ... 34567 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!