Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 31

Thread: RRS or D3??

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    831
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by garrycol View Post
    I would rather drive an esky than a fridge - at least it has wheels
    I'm sorry Gary - I should have pointed out that the photo was taken with my fridge in "access mode" so the wheels aren't readily obvious....
    heh heh heh.....

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    191
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Gee wiz Gary, I obviously spend too much time on the LR3 site!
    Regards
    Barryp

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    74
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by garrycol View Post
    ...but we should insist on calling our vehicles by their correct names - Discovery 3 or D3 not the American Landrover 3 or LR3.
    Garry
    Yeah, and stop the nonsense about us speaking english! I speak 'straylen!

    Don't get me started on "cul de sac" - they might have those in France, but here we have a "dead end street with a spot at the end to chuck a u-ey"

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Nanny state UK...
    Posts
    3,253
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Drive them both and see what you like.

    They're both based on the same chassis (the RRS is 6" shorter) but the main difference is the Disco has a massive trunk or can carry 7 people in comfort.

    M

  5. #25
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    On The Road
    Posts
    30,031
    Total Downloaded
    0
    this is a massive trunk--


    "How long since you've visited The Good Oil?"

    '93 V8 Rossi
    '97 to '07. sold.
    '01 V8 D2
    '06 to 10. written off.
    '03 4.6 V8 HSE D2a with Tornado ECM
    '10 to '21
    '16.5 RRS SDV8
    '21 to Infinity and Beyond!


    1988 Isuzu Bus. V10 15L NA Diesel
    Home is where you park it..

    [IMG][/IMG]

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    sydney
    Posts
    116
    Total Downloaded
    0
    After having driven both and owned two discos they are kinda chalk and cheese in my opinion. If you want a great looking, sporty handling landrover go the sport, if you want practicality and huge space and want to go 4wding every weekend, and you'll probably want to do what the rest of us have done and add the mods then the Disco is a no brainer, for all the reasons already mentioned.
    My perfect scenario, the D 4 I have now and a brand new RR sport with 20" rims
    Parked alongside it. Go the Monday night Lotto!!

  7. #27
    sheerluck Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Pedro_The_Swift View Post
    this is a massive trunk--


    I don't remember seeing that on the list of options Pedro! Though if you have one if them, there's going to be bugger all space left in the boot.

    Damned Americanisms creeping in everywhere.

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Brisbane West
    Posts
    7,372
    Total Downloaded
    0
    The new RRS looks the bees knees...the old one looked bloated and lardy next to a d4 (my personal opinion of course)

    Cheers

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    74
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by ozscott View Post
    The new RRS looks the bees knees...the old one looked bloated and lardy next to a d4 (my personal opinion of course)

    Cheers
    The selection of wheels on the new one seems to make the difference between it looking the ducks nuts, and looking dowdy. I've seen a couple that look really terrible, but then the ones with stonking great wheels look great.

    That said, I still think the New FF Range Rover looks like what the new RR Sport should have been - now that is a good looking car!

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    18,616
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by DanW View Post
    That said, I still think the New FF Range Rover looks like what the new RR Sport should have been - now that is a good looking car!
    Each to their own I guess - to me the new FFRR looks like a hi end Hyundai or Kia SUV and the new RRS looks like a 4wd and is far more balanced in its styling.

    Garry
    REMLR 243

    2007 Range Rover Sport TDV6
    1977 FC 101
    1976 Jaguar XJ12C
    1973 Haflinger AP700
    1971 Jaguar V12 E-Type Series 3 Roadster
    1957 Series 1 88"
    1957 Series 1 88" Station Wagon

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!