Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 16 of 16

Thread: D4 3.0 motor options.

  1. #11
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    4,842
    Total Downloaded
    0

    Thumbs up

    Quote Originally Posted by Epic pooh View Post
    This is all very complicated Andy

    They have an engine people like me can understand:

    V8 - 5.0 - 276kw, 510nm

    No timing belts, turbos or other witchcraft !
    Not many of these around though!
    I asked our Landrover saleslady about them, and she said, & I quote, "The V8 Discovery goes like the clappers"!.....Nothing like a V8 IMHO..(No substitute for cubic inches, or as they say these days, no replacement for displacement?) I realize these statements normally relate to "normal" cars ( I've had LOTS of V8s, the last being an AMG C63), so how do you like your "V8"?
    Pickles.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Wollongong
    Posts
    773
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I have a D3 V8, so have to make do with a mere 225Kw and a paltry 430nm or so of torques ... it's an awesome motor and (to me) it really suits the car ... typical modern multicam/multivalve V8 motor, does what you want it to do in a lazy way until you give it the boot ... then it goes like stink (well, for a 2.7T vehicle ... ) ... I am a V8 whore from way back ... no plans to part with it !

    Sorry for the thread hijack Andy

  3. #13
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Brisbane, QLD, Australia
    Posts
    2,252
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Pickles2 View Post
    Not many of these around though!
    I asked our Landrover saleslady about them, and she said, & I quote, "The V8 Discovery goes like the clappers"!.....Nothing like a V8 IMHO..(No substitute for cubic inches, or as they say these days, no replacement for displacement?) I realize these statements normally relate to "normal" cars ( I've had LOTS of V8s, the last being an AMG C63), so how do you like your "V8"?
    Pickles.
    That sounds like past tense, did you get rid of the AMG ... how did those Conti's go?

    Cheers,

    Kev.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Bangor, NSW
    Posts
    1,508
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Celtoid View Post
    ...did you get rid of the AMG ... .

    He had to - it was terrible off-road!

  5. #15
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    4,842
    Total Downloaded
    0

    Thumbs up

    Quote Originally Posted by Celtoid View Post
    That sounds like past tense, did you get rid of the AMG ... how did those Conti's go?

    Cheers,

    Kev.
    Yes, we don't have the C63 any more, the Contis were pretty good, .....at least as good as the Yokohamas that were on it previously.
    Pickles.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Brisbane, QLD, Australia
    Posts
    2,252
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Pickles2 View Post
    Yes, we don't have the C63 any more, the Contis were pretty good, .....at least as good as the Yokohamas that were on it previously.
    Pickles.
    I ended up putting Kumho KU39s on my wife's Merc. I knew nothing about these tyres so was a bit dubious but they had good reviews. I'm very impressed and they are considerably cheaper than the Conti Sports.

    Admittedly the C250 CDI has nowhere near the grunt of a G63 but with 510 torques, it's pretty hard on rear tyres. I found them as quiet as the Contis (if not better) and a better, more direct/stable drive. They don't appear to have any grip issues in the wet or dry either.

    But the main thing, they are not wearing anywhere near as quickly as the Contis. I recently even got Mercedes to admit that some AMG owners are lucky to get 10K out of their tyres.

    Kev.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!