remember, most toyota people think the 100 series was a better car than the 200 series.
d4 is better than both.
Printable View
remember, most toyota people think the 100 series was a better car than the 200 series.
d4 is better than both.
but why a petrol?
diesel as good as if not better.
Yes, D4 3.0l with Compomotives, factor this into the price from the beginning to avoid the whinging later.Quote:
Originally Posted by Eevo
I'd say petrol v8, but with the twin inductions, you'd have to work out a way to plumb a safari snorkel in by re-routing one which I'm not sure has been achieved yet?
Less accessories available for the v8 i think. Depends, if it's going to be a tourer or not???
I do find it amusing how many people whinge about having to spend extra money on Compomotives when 70 series Land Cruiser owners are taking a brand new 4x4 and spending $6000+ to fix the tracking issue that Toyota was too lazy to fix.
All I can add is a post I made a few years ago after a run in Terry O's V8,,
something about not doing "as much" after 160kph,,, [bigwhistle]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eevo
My D4 is definitely better than my 100 series was.
and the thing with a d4 is, you take it for a test drive, says 30min, it feels the same as a 200 series. but yon dont discovery the real features that separate the to for a several weeks.
And then there is stuff like this that turns me off.
Motor replacement D4
happens with all car manufactures, including toyota.Quote:
Originally Posted by Vern
And its not the V8.Quote:
Originally Posted by Vern
I thought that the 200 was TDV8 and not a petrol ?