Depends on age also. They changed the Alloy to a stronger one at some point.
 TopicToaster
					
					
						Subscriber
					
					
						TopicToaster
					
					
						SubscriberAnd how many have been produced?
Any wheel would have likely suffered the same fate I’m sure given the same circumstances of impact. Compomotive are world renowned for their performance. There may be an argument that they have had to compromise strength through lower material thickness to get them to fit around the brakes in an 18” format, which might be a reason that there have been some damaged.
2010 TDV6 3.0L Discovery 4 HSE
2007 Audi RS4 (B7)
Depends on age also. They changed the Alloy to a stronger one at some point.
I was surprised and disappointed that my Compomotive buckled the way it did. Whether or not another alloy wheel would of done the same is purely conjecture.
The impact from hitting the washaway was negligible - to the point that i wasnt even sure i fully hit it. That maybe says more for the impressiveness of the D4 suspension than anything else. In fact, if it hadn't of been for the severe grinding as my flattened wheel scrapped over the caliper, i would of thought nothing of it...
 YarnMaster
					
					
						YarnMaster
					
					
                                        
					
					
						I did think about buying a set of Compomotives but decided against. The total expence of tyres plus rims and the losses selling the original tyres and rims just didn't add up to me. For what we do I think a good set of Maxxis or other 19" tyre will suffice.
Saying that I may look at the 18" steel rims some have said about in a few months after reading any feedback from others.
AlanH.
 TopicToaster
					
					
						Subscriber
					
					
						TopicToaster
					
					
						SubscriberMy only concern with the steel wheels is the weight. I've got a set of Compomotives and now Tuff Ants also. Even on the much lighter Compomotives - running my STT (275/65/18) there was a noticeable increase in unsprung weight. This was evident in just everyday driving. When I eventually mount the STT's to the steels, this will result in a much heavier wheel, and I suspect even more of a noticeable difference. I also think there will be a much higher chance of driveline failure (ie CV's) because of the shock loading of a heavier spinning wheel suddenly stopping. Having said that, everythings a compromise and for me i couldn't justify the expense of 2 sets of Compomotives.
What is your baseline for sensing more weight? Tyre type and diameter has a greater affect than the wheel.
For example, I noticed this swapping between Compo/KO2 265/60/18 and OEM LR/GY 255/55/19
The Tuffant weighs 5kg more than the Compomotive or LR rim but that weight is distributed between the disc and rim sections of the wheel. The further away from centre the more effect extra weight will have on rotational inertia and so I don't agree that some proportion of the 5kg will increase shock loading failure risk much. There's a greater risk factor in the larger diameter & heavier tyre which puts that extra weight significantly further from rotational centre, especially with a 275/65/18
Scott
D4 TDV6 MY14 with Llams, Tuffant Wheels, Traxide DBS, APT sliders & protection plates, Prospeed Winch Mount w/ Carbon 12K, Mitch Hitch & Drifta Drawers
Link to my D4 Build Thread
D3 2005 V8 Petrol
Ex '77 RRC 2 door. Long gone but not forgotten.
Baseline is seat of the pants swapping between tyres. Sure, size plays a part but we are not talking large increases in size. I'm going from a 265/60 to a 275/65 so there is always going to be a noticeable difference in performance, but my reference also comes from other members who after fitting the TuffAnts and running similar tyres to beforehand also notice the reduced performance. Given tyre sizes remained similar, I (maybe incorrectly) put this down to increased weight from both the wheel, and to a lesser extent the tyre.
| Search AULRO.com ONLY! | Search All the Web! | 
|---|
|  |  | 
Bookmarks