Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234
Results 31 to 38 of 38

Thread: 2010 discovery vs 2010 Range Rover sport

  1. #31
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Kalgoorlie WA
    Posts
    5,546
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by RobMichelle View Post
    Thanks, pretty good feedback much appreciated for sure.
    Is that a tough boy rear wheel carrier( I might have brand wrong) no issues with it BMKal ?
    With the d2 it was for room, as we had a pop top and more stuff went in back of car, now we have a full van less will be in back of car, but I still need to fit uhf and HF radio so unsure of room in dash area of RRS, I am only going on pics from car sales as none for sale up this way.
    The v8 motor could be a factor just cos.
    Thanks again for comments been great reading.
    Rob
    Wheel carrier and long range tank on mine are both "Outback Accessories" - made in Perth, WA. Only issue with wheel carrier is that the wheel sits a little further to the right than some others, requiring an additional tail light to be fitted as you block vision of the OEM right hand side lights. I don't find this a problem though, and I believe that it gives you better rear vision through the central rear vision mirror. The additional "tail light" that comes with the carrier is a pretty crappy square trailer light with bayonet mount globes - I replaced this with the LED unit on it now for better reliability and to keep the appearance more in line with the OEM lights.

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Location
    Horsham Victoria
    Posts
    724
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Great feedback from all, thankyou very much 2010 discovery vs 2010 Range Rover sport
    As AFT mentioned the RRS seems cheaper with lower kms than a d4 that I have seen, with sellers claiming perfect servicing as per Carsales adds. So I’m still undecided but great reading and very appreciative of everyone’s time.
    Rob

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    18,616
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by RobMichelle View Post
    As AFT mentioned the RRS seems cheaper with lower kms than a d4 that I have seen,
    Rob
    When you compare apples with apples you will find the RRS is still more expensive than the equivalent Disco. Remembering that from 2013 you will be comparing the D4 with the L494 RRS not the L320 RRS.
    REMLR 243

    2007 Range Rover Sport TDV6
    1977 FC 101
    1976 Jaguar XJ12C
    1973 Haflinger AP700
    1971 Jaguar V12 E-Type Series 3 Roadster
    1957 Series 1 88"
    1957 Series 1 88" Station Wagon

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    NSW SW Slopes
    Posts
    12,033
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by rar110 View Post
    Thanks Graeme, so looks like the larger callipers rule out the Compo rims?
    Yes, the callipers have the same part number as the 6-pots as on my L322 and people have demonstrated that the Compos don't fit a 4.4 TDV8 L322.
    MY21.5 L405 D350 Vogue SE with 19s. Produce LLAMS for LR/RR, Jeep GC/Dodge Ram
    VK2HFG and APRS W1 digi, RTK base station using LoRa

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    NSW SW Slopes
    Posts
    12,033
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by 101RRS View Post
    When you compare apples with apples you will find the RRS is still more expensive than the equivalent Disco. Remembering that from 2013 you will be comparing the D4 with the L494 RRS not the L320 RRS.
    L494 started with MY2014, late in 2013. Only the L405 started with MY2013.
    MY21.5 L405 D350 Vogue SE with 19s. Produce LLAMS for LR/RR, Jeep GC/Dodge Ram
    VK2HFG and APRS W1 digi, RTK base station using LoRa

  6. #36
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    18,616
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Graeme View Post
    L494 started with MY2014, late in 2013. Only the L405 started with MY2013.
    So as I said the L494 started in 2013 - I didn't say anything about MY13.
    REMLR 243

    2007 Range Rover Sport TDV6
    1977 FC 101
    1976 Jaguar XJ12C
    1973 Haflinger AP700
    1971 Jaguar V12 E-Type Series 3 Roadster
    1957 Series 1 88"
    1957 Series 1 88" Station Wagon

  7. #37
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    92
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by 101RRS View Post
    So as I said the L494 started in 2013 - I didn't say anything about MY13.
    I remember at the time the runout 2013 L320s were being advertised at 80k d.a. The base L320 is still well equipped.

    And have a MY 13.5 L320. Plenty around with some extra kit (the only additions of substance were the steering wheel paddles and perforated leather)

  8. #38
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    1,201
    Total Downloaded
    0

    Cons and not so many pros

    Hi I've had 2010 D4 with the 2.7 diesel, 2010 RRS TDV8, and currently 2010 D4 3.0 diesel (HSE for what it's worth) - and given them all a decent amount of offroad curry including camper trailer in the Flinders Ranges etc. I think the fact of the matter is that the RRS started life as a Disco, and was compromised rather than improved on, for offroad applications.

    The TDV8 is exquisite to drive, torque for days whether it's on the road or blasting out of a creek bed. In the Vic high country I never found a spur steep or rocky enough that it wouldn't just walk up at 1200 rpm. Which is just as well, because yes, 19 and 20 inch rims are your only options (unless you want to stick to pre-2010 update, which is a suite of other changes to be aware of). And the special snow chains required for the front on 20s, that avoid the tiny gap between the rubber and strut, cost over $700. The TDV8 is also over 100kg heavier, which comes out of your payload (down to 530kg for the RRS, from something like 860kg in the D4 2.7). The TDV8 is also thirstier. I averaged 25l/km over four days in the Vic High Country. Also worth noting for the TDV8 is that certain things like the front lower control arms are heavier duty, therefore cost a heap more when it inevitably comes time to replace the bushes/arms. The rear tailgate isn't split fold and I missed it every time I opned the back - you really need to check how it'll clear whatever your tow set up is. But all that said, you're talking touring with a van more than offroading, and it can work. You just need to be really clear about whether it's a logical or emotional decision. The D4 feels like every car you'll ever need (remember the ad?!), while the RRS is the car you just love despite all it's compromises.

    In short, I'd always wanted a V8 Rangie, and absolutely loved the RRS, best car I ever had the privelege of tipping money into. I'll never buy another one!
    Now 2016 D4 HSE 'Leo' and Steve the Triumph Speed Twin
    Then 2010 D4 3.0 HSE 'James'
    Then 2010 RRS TDV8 'Roger' w traxide DBS, UHF, Cooper Zeons, Superchips remap
    Then 2010 D4 TDV6 'Jumbo' w traxide DBS
    First love 2002 D2 TD5 'Disco Stu'

Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!