Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 29 of 29

Thread: Next tow vehicle after sdv6 D4

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    450
    Total Downloaded
    0
    A quick summary of these posts so far:
    The D4 provided most of what people wanted

    So, the question:
    Why did you change and do you regret it?

    I’m holding onto my D4 for dear life. Not complaining about maintenance, actively looking to stay ahead of anything that may break. Understanding that a few $k in maintenance (that I luckily can afford) is cheaper than the depreciation on a $140k new vehicle.

    I also appreciate that the above story has been replayed since the very first vehicle produced…but I’m interested in other’s opinions on the change.

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Melbourne, AU
    Posts
    839
    Total Downloaded
    0
    My 2c worth having gone from D4 to L663 recently

    Barn door is fine with me as reaching over the drop down D4 for load carrying was a pain
    Fitting out the D4 for touring - the 3rd row seats we never used and were a waste of space and weight
    L663 has useful space under the cargo floor for my battery and inverter
    Spare wheel under the car in the D4 compromised cargo space fitout for access to that horrible wind down thing - which failed and was only used twice in 5 years.
    L663 2nd row seats fold completely flat giving a huge, flat cargo space
    We tow a 5m boat which either vehicle hardly know it's on the back
    Not denying the D4 was a superb touring and offroad vehicle we are finding the Defender a notch better.
    _________________________
    1996 D1 V8 - gone
    2002 D2 Td5 ES- gone but still running elsewhere
    2013 D4 SDV6 HSE - gone
    2023 Defender 110SE D300

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    Baldivis WA
    Posts
    2,293
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by scarry View Post
    As for the rear door on the new Defender,many complain about it as well.
    An option for a split tailgate would have been a great idea,but no such luck,probably too difficult to do.
    Having the spare hanging off the rear,one would think a larger fuel tank would be the go,if not the 110, maybe the 130,anyway,as with the European trend,it is still smallish.
    Cant really complain on the rear door of L663, its well balanced, you can open or close it with a soft push, it stays where you leave it, and the soft close is also nice, no need to slam it at all. The reverse camera is well calibrated so you can reverse into a bay and using the first marker, still open the door if needed, if you need to back in more, the second marker on the screeen lets you know the minimum to avoid hitting thr tyre cover. Would a split door work? Horizontally split no, but a vertical split with the spare mounted off centre to the passenger side, with the option to fit a second on the other door, now theres an idea...

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    4,497
    Total Downloaded
    0
    You can sit on the fold out board no problem. I have many times. I reckon you could stand on it too but you'd have to be < 1m tall due to the tail gate.

    Quote Originally Posted by Eric SDV6SE View Post
    The D5 has a single lift up tailgate and a little fold up end board, that you cant sit or stand on..............

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    melbourne
    Posts
    506
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by SimmAus View Post
    A quick summary of these posts so far:
    The D4 provided most of what people wanted

    So, the question:
    Why did you change and do you regret it?

    I’m holding onto my D4 for dear life. Not complaining about maintenance, actively looking to stay ahead of anything that may break. Understanding that a few $k in maintenance (that I luckily can afford) is cheaper than the depreciation on a $140k new vehicle.

    I also appreciate that the above story has been replayed since the very first vehicle produced…but I’m interested in other’s opinions on the change.
    This is where I am at, trade the perfect D4 because its 10 years old, all be it well serviced and so far, touch wood, faultless , or keep and repair as requireds
    But the real question is trade to what?
    200 cruiser, to expensive, thirsty and in reality no more reliable than a good Disco
    300 cruiser, good power, good economy, would be good on road and excellent off road, the flex in them is exceptional but new and unproven so given Toyota's and new models, pass
    Grenadier, just to many issues and faults, no service manuals as promised and stuff all service / dealer network
    Defender, take a punt on another LR, possible nightmare, possibly the best car ever, guaranteed huge depreciation
    Range Rover V8 diesel, second hand not new, low load capacity, stuff all aftermarket gear like bar work, long range tanks etc
    Discovery 1 4.6, true trac front and rear, superior engineering arms,old tourer now bush toy
    Discovery 4 3.0 HSE MY13 ECB Bull bar, winch, spot lights, aux fuel tank, Kaymar rear bar, duel wheel carriers, 18 tuff ant wheels 265/65/18 BFG KO2's for play

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Brisbane,some of the time.
    Posts
    13,886
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by discomatt69 View Post
    This is where I am at, trade the perfect D4 because its 10 years old, all be it well serviced and so far, touch wood, faultless , or keep and repair as requireds
    But the real question is trade to what?
    200 cruiser, to expensive, thirsty and in reality no more reliable than a good Disco
    300 cruiser, good power, good economy, would be good on road and excellent off road, the flex in them is exceptional but new and unproven so given Toyota's and new models, pass
    Grenadier, just to many issues and faults, no service manuals as promised and stuff all service / dealer network
    Defender, take a punt on another LR, possible nightmare, possibly the best car ever, guaranteed huge depreciation
    Range Rover V8 diesel, second hand not new, low load capacity, stuff all aftermarket gear like bar work, long range tanks etc
    Had the D4(2.7L),for almost 10 yrs,and the LC200 for almost 4.
    Fuel economy for both is almost exactly the same,yet the 200 is faster,heavier,and has a heap more torque.Not that were are particularly fixated on fuel economy like some,but both vehicles were/are company owned so all fuel and mileage are logged.We don’t tow,but do often run fully loaded.The 3L and 8speed would be better on fuel as it is lighter and possibly quicker, at a guess.
    Reliability wise,the D4 had 11 issues during the warranty period,and issues continued out of warranty.
    The LC,not a single issue,and it has done almost 50% more Ks a year than the D4 did.
    And a heap of off road work.
    But agree,second hand prices are absolutely rediculous,I would rather pay more and get a 300,but I would miss the rear tailgate setup,it is so handy,particularly for touring,camping,etc.
    Looking at the forums,thev300 has very few issues,particularly if you look at the huge nunber being sold,compared to say Defender.
    Anyway,as I have said before each to their own,everyone has different needs.

  7. #27
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    On The Road
    Posts
    30,030
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I heard the 300's were having trouble making the service intervals.... yoyata's solution was "add oil"....
    "How long since you've visited The Good Oil?"

    '93 V8 Rossi
    '97 to '07. sold.
    '01 V8 D2
    '06 to 10. written off.
    '03 4.6 V8 HSE D2a with Tornado ECM
    '10 to '21
    '16.5 RRS SDV8
    '21 to Infinity and Beyond!


    1988 Isuzu Bus. V10 15L NA Diesel
    Home is where you park it..

    [IMG][/IMG]

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    melbourne
    Posts
    506
    Total Downloaded
    0
    claims fuel economy is the same or almost the same between the 200 and a D3 or 4 are open to perception and interpretation
    Our last big trip was with friends who own a 200 and exactly same van as ours, both cars have pretty much same mods except I run a bigger tire, he runs standard size
    over 16000km I averaged 14.7. he averaged low 18's and up to low 20's at times, ours never went above 18's

    yep small difference where perception and interpretation comes in, 2 , 3 or 4l per 100 isn't much, over a 16000km trip its a significant difference, over a years driving a big difference, over the life of the vehicle a huge difference

    Whilst discussing the last trip I will also mention we did a fair amount of rough dirt roads and a very small amount of 4wding, the Disco didn't have one issue or fault, the 200 sat in a caravan park in Geraldton for a week which included 2 days at the Toyota dealer for a ABS / TC fault which they couldn't fix in their available time frame, a independent and recommended auto elec found a broken cable in the front loom that runs between the wheel hub speed sensor and the main loom in half an hour
    Discovery 1 4.6, true trac front and rear, superior engineering arms,old tourer now bush toy
    Discovery 4 3.0 HSE MY13 ECB Bull bar, winch, spot lights, aux fuel tank, Kaymar rear bar, duel wheel carriers, 18 tuff ant wheels 265/65/18 BFG KO2's for play

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Brisbane,some of the time.
    Posts
    13,886
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by discomatt69 View Post
    claims fuel economy is the same or almost the same between the 200 and a D3 or 4 are open to perception and interpretation
    If you read my post I said not towing……..although it is a bit off topic to what the OP asked.

    It is a well known fact they use more than a D3/4 towing,but that all depends on vehicle accessories,speeds,weights,etc,etc,and some look at the dash read out and think that is accurate,so who knows the real facts.

    Your post is also open to perception,your vehicle averaged 14.7,what did the other vehicle actually average for the whole trip?
    There is a lot more to the full costs of an owning a vehicle,than just fuel,there is depreciation,repair costs and on it goes.

    Seems like the Tojo dealer wherever you were was no better than the majority of LR dealers.

    Edit,if you actually work out the figures for a trip of16,000km,and fuel at $2.20l,one vehicle at 14.7 L/100,one using around 3.5l/100 more,the difference is $1233.00.So not a major amount.Bugga all actually,in the whole scheme of things.If the trip was 12 months that would be $23/week.A six month trip $46/week.
    After the trip,back to no towing,fuel would be very similar,probably the same,depending on mods,driver style,etc.
    If both were bought new,for similar costs,at the end of the road,say 10 to 15yrs old,there is a good chance one will be worth close to double the other.
    As for repairs,that depends on lots of things as does maintenance.
    Then on a modern LR there is add blue as well,but probably a negligible cost.
    Last edited by scarry; 30th March 2024 at 01:54 PM. Reason: Added the edit at the bottom of post.

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!