Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 18

Thread: The $49,995 Range Rover

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    4,497
    Total Downloaded
    0

    The $49,995 Range Rover

    Range Rover Evoque costs less than $50k, emits less CO2 than Yaris

    This branding strategy of using "Range Rover" really annoys me. We're supposed to be be dumb enough to think there some commonality to the RR. When you think of the Prado, do you think its a cut down Land Cruiser just because "Land Cruiser" is splashed across the back door?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    where every one holidays, sunny coast
    Posts
    1,712
    Total Downloaded
    0
    it will work,, they will sell,, alltho,, the new freelander 3 is comming soon,, and MY GOD you should see it,, it actuly look brilent, and is going to be cheaper(aparently)

    alltho the new vogue,, just WOW,, all i have to say is wow,

    next month im going on the traning days for the evoque

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    South Yundreup,WA.
    Posts
    7,468
    Total Downloaded
    0
    May sell to the posers who only want status and not 4x4, which is what most new RR buyers are anyway.
    2011 Discovery 4 TDV6
    2009 DRZ400E Suzuki
    1956 & 1961 P4 Rover (project)
    1976 SS Torana (project - all cash donations or parts accepted)
    2003 WK Holden Statesman
    Departed
    2000 Defender Extreme: Shrek (but only to son)
    84 RR (Gone) 97 Tdi Disco (Gone)
    98 Ducati 900SS Gone & Missed

    Facta Non Verba

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    1,209
    Total Downloaded
    0
    It says the base version for 50k is a 2WD!

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Samford
    Posts
    704
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by WhiteD3 View Post
    Range Rover Evoque costs less than $50k, emits less CO2 than Yaris

    This branding strategy of using "Range Rover" really annoys me. We're supposed to be be dumb enough to think there some commonality to the RR. When you think of the Prado, do you think its a cut down Land Cruiser just because "Land Cruiser" is splashed across the back door?
    I agree. It degrades the branding. It looks like it could be a great vehicle (if you're into that sort of thing), but not worthy of being called a Range Rover.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Queensland
    Posts
    7,904
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by WhiteD3 View Post
    This branding strategy of using "Range Rover" really annoys me.
    Yes it is “Brand Strategy” but look carefully, this is not using the Range Rover image to sell a new CAR, this is an insight into where Land Rover is heading, out of the 4WD market and into upmarket luxury CARS.

    The current Range Rover is already a useless off roader and “IF” they make a D5, it will be in the same vain, a vehicle pretending to be an off roader.

    Furthermore, they are no longer interested in their base market, they are making far more money selling to the Chinese and they don’t give a stuff about off roading.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    18,616
    Total Downloaded
    0
    It is not really a $49,995 Range Rover as all prices by law now have to be onroad prices - so really about a $55,995 Range Rover (Freelander with different body)
    REMLR 243

    2007 Range Rover Sport TDV6
    1977 FC 101
    1976 Jaguar XJ12C
    1973 Haflinger AP700
    1971 Jaguar V12 E-Type Series 3 Roadster
    1957 Series 1 88"
    1957 Series 1 88" Station Wagon

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    where every one holidays, sunny coast
    Posts
    1,712
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by garrycol View Post
    so really about a $55,995 Range Rover (Freelander with different body)
    is it just ??? mmmm

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Rockhampton
    Posts
    128
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I am all for anything that boosts Landrover sales no matter which car it may be. If they dont adapt to the market and make sales then they will disappear altogether.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Queensland
    Posts
    7,904
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by rockyroad View Post
    I am all for anything that boosts Landrover sales no matter which car it may be.
    Totally agree, but why couldn’t they have made an option available where you could order a 3lt D4 with 17” wheels, or a Range Rover Vogue EXTREME that doesn’t have ****** racing brakes, so you could again put REAL off road wheels and tyres on them.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!