Page 3 of 6 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 54

Thread: Do we need an Evoque section?

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Lake Macquarie. NSW.
    Posts
    7,996
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Lotz-A-Landies View Post
    My $0.02, we should have a "small platform" or "AWD" section and have three sub-forums: Freelander 1; Freelander 2; Evoque.

    On the RRS section, RRS was never top of the range, always marketed as a cheaper, smaller Range Rover model, not unlike the Disco 1 when released. Given that it shares the same platform as the D3 and D4 then IMHO it should stay where it is.

    On the Isuzu section, there has never been a Land Rover workshop manual for the Isuzu engined vehicles so there is a greater need for Isuzu owners to share information. They should keep their section.

    Diana
    I agree, the Evoque is aimed at the same market that would buy a Freelander, so the Freelander section of the Forum should be changed to "AWD Section" with the appropriate sub-forums and leave the RRS where it is!! My 1c worth!!

  2. #22
    sheerluck Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Ausfree View Post
    I agree, the Evoque is aimed at the same market that would buy a Freelander, so the Freelander section of the Forum should be changed to "AWD Section" with the appropriate sub-forums and leave the RRS where it is!! My 1c worth!!
    What about when the 2wd version of the Evoque is launched in July 2012? Should they be banished from the site altogether?

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    East-South-East Girt-By-Sea
    Posts
    17,662
    Total Downloaded
    1.20 MB

    Isuzu engines and small Land Rovers

    Quote Originally Posted by p38arover View Post
    If it is retained then only engine-related info should be there. Anything else should be in the other area.
    Agreed in part. The conversion of R380 boxes to suit the 4BD1 and the Isuzu gearbox conversions need to stay as does anything related to spring modifications to support the additonal weight of the 4BD1. All in all, which means the mods for the area need to be a bit consistent with retaining or moving threads.
    Quote Originally Posted by sheerluck View Post
    What about when the 2wd version of the Evoque is launched in July 2012? Should they be banished from the site altogether?
    That was the reason I suggested a "small platform" before the "AWD", although we could call it "AWD and 2WD Land Rover products"

    Diana

    You won't find me on: faceplant; Scipe; Infragam; LumpedIn; ShapCnat or Twitting. I'm just not that interesting.

  4. #24
    p38arover's Avatar
    p38arover is offline Major part of the heart and soul of AULRO.com
    Administrator
    I'm here to help you!
    Gold Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Western Sydney
    Posts
    30,704
    Total Downloaded
    1.63 MB
    Quote Originally Posted by Lotz-A-Landies View Post
    All in all, which means the mods for the area need to be a bit consistent with retaining or moving threads.
    Agreed.
    Ron B.
    VK2OTC

    2003 L322 Range Rover Vogue 4.4 V8 Auto
    2007 Yamaha XJR1300
    Previous: 1983, 1986 RRC; 1995, 1996 P38A; 1995 Disco1; 1984 V8 County 110; Series IIA



    RIP Bucko - Riding on Forever

  5. #25
    VladTepes's Avatar
    VladTepes is offline Major Part of the Heart and Soul of AULRO Subscriber
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Bracken Ridge, Qld
    Posts
    16,055
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Ausfree View Post
    I agree, the Evoque is aimed at the same market that would buy a Freelander, so the Freelander section of the Forum should be changed to "AWD Section" with the appropriate sub-forums and leave the RRS where it is!! My 1c worth!!
    I think something along these lines is a good idea.

    Just need to think up an ideal name for the forum that won't offend any owners (which rules out my idea of "useless vehicles with LR and RR badges").

    Whatever decision is taken for theevoque I don;t see any raesonit has to affect the RRS sub forum - just leave that where t is - for now anyway.
    It's not broken. It's "Carbon Neutral".


    gone


    1993 Defender 110 ute "Doris"
    1994 Range Rover Vogue LSE "The Luxo-Barge"
    1994 Defender 130 HCPU "Rolly"
    1996 Discovery 1

    current

    1995 Defender 130 HCPU and Suzuki GSX1400


  6. #26
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    2780
    Posts
    8,257
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I reckon that Isuzu section should become a sub-forum of Defender etc.

    Evoque should go in as a sub-forum of Range Rovers. All of the existing divisions are badge/model specific rather than being based in wheelbase/chassis type/etc.

    Just looking forward, if there's a D100 based on Discovery chassis would we put it into the Discovery section?

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Tumbi Umbi, Central Coast, NSW
    Posts
    5,768
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by VladTepes View Post
    I think something along these lines is a good idea.

    Just need to think up an ideal name for the forum that won't offend any owners (which rules out my idea of "useless vehicles with LR and RR badges").

    ... ... ...
    Do you think people might be offended by my suggestion that we only need two categories:
    • Real Land Rovers
    • All the others
    ?


    I don't envy the task of anyone trying to come up with a suitable division. I believe that it is common whenever such a task is attempted, that there will be anomalies and exceptions.

    1973 Series III LWB 1983 - 2006
    1998 300 Tdi Defender Trayback 2006 - often fitted with a Trayon slide-on camper.

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    East-South-East Girt-By-Sea
    Posts
    17,662
    Total Downloaded
    1.20 MB
    Quote Originally Posted by abaddonxi View Post
    ....<snip>
    Evoque should go in as a sub-forum of Range Rovers. All of the existing divisions are badge/model specific rather than being based in wheelbase/chassis type/etc.
    <snip...
    Even the 2WD variant. The only reason the Evoque is badged Range Rover is for marketing to tag onto the top of the range image, as we all know both Freelander 1 and Discovery have an image of very poor reliability in the US.

    You won't find me on: faceplant; Scipe; Infragam; LumpedIn; ShapCnat or Twitting. I'm just not that interesting.

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Sydney, West
    Posts
    1,241
    Total Downloaded
    0
    To back up the Isuzu section (I was a long term poster in there, now have a 130 td5), it isn't just the engine that gets talked about. Because the Isuzu chews up gearboxes there is a lot of discussion on mating different gearboxes to the lt230 and engine, then you have all the turbo talk. I feel there is enough talk and things going on to leave it as its own section.

    Just my thoughts though

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    2780
    Posts
    8,257
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Lotz-A-Landies View Post
    Even the 2WD variant. The only reason the Evoque is badged Range Rover is for marketing to tag onto the top of the range image, as we all know both Freelander 1 and Discovery have an image of very poor reliability in the US.
    The only 2wd Land Rover? I think it deserves its own section.

Page 3 of 6 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!