Page 7 of 8 FirstFirst ... 5678 LastLast
Results 61 to 70 of 74

Thread: New Defender an immediate success

  1. #61
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Armstrong Creek, Qld
    Posts
    8,752
    Total Downloaded
    0
    The main thing I take away from all this is the futility of conjecture. I'm more than willing to wait for some learned AULRO member to comment AFTER they have put the vehicle through some work.
    How anyone can state that any vehicle is rubbish, just from some photos and vids, is not very logical to me.

  2. #62
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Adelaide Hills. South Australia
    Posts
    13,349
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Saitch View Post
    The main thing I take away from all this is the futility of conjecture. I'm more than willing to wait for some learned AULRO member to comment AFTER they have put the vehicle through some work.
    How anyone can state that any vehicle is rubbish, just from some photos and vids, is not very logical to me.

    WOT? Get it dirty? Yeah right.


    Just got to find someone who is prepared to do that with their million $ Baby.

  3. #63
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Armstrong Creek, Qld
    Posts
    8,752
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by 4bee View Post
    WOT? Get it dirty? Yeah right.


    Just got to find someone who is prepared to do that with their million $ Baby.
    If I had the money and liked the vehicle and purchased one, after an inspection and drive, I'd certainly be using for the same purpose as I've used all my Landies for.
    Also, this "Small fuel tank" syndrome that people mention surprises me. My D1 had an 89 litre tank and that gave adequate range for 99.9% of anywhere in Oz. On the Gibb, Gunbarrel and Simpson, I did carry a Jerry can as a just-in-caser.
    I would think the new 'fender would be a lot more economical than my D1, my D3 and my old Defenders so, what's the issue? The Canning? Take a Jerry or two. A lot cheaper than $1500-$2000 for an auxiliary.

  4. #64
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Brisbane West
    Posts
    7,372
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Saitch View Post
    If I had the money and liked the vehicle and purchased one, after an inspection and drive, I'd certainly be using for the same purpose as I've used all my Landies for.
    Also, this "Small fuel tank" syndrome that people mention surprises me. My D1 had an 89 litre tank and that gave adequate range for 99.9% of anywhere in Oz. On the Gibb, Gunbarrel and Simpson, I did carry a Jerry can as a just-in-caser.
    I would think the new 'fender would be a lot more economical than my D1, my D3 and my old Defenders so, what's the issue? The Canning? Take a Jerry or two. A lot cheaper than $1500-$2000 for an auxiliary.
    Yep for sure. I just purchased 2 x Scepter diesel 20l containers and a Flo'N'Go fuel pump (same brand) to draw diesel easily straight into the filler and they will go into the ute tub. 40 litres of added diesel yields a lot of kilometres even off-road. I can leave them out and not have added weight when not needed. I know modern low sulpher diesel is not as safe as the old type but in my view it's still quite safe to transport and decant if sensible about static spark risk. Much much cheaper and doesn't interfere with clearance and departure angles etc.

    Cheers

  5. #65
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    392
    Total Downloaded
    0
    There’s no obviously great place to carry extra diesel on the new Defender. The roof is sort of the only option, unless you throw the spare tyre up on top and re-purpose the tyre carrier for a couple of jerries.

  6. #66
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Brisbane West
    Posts
    7,372
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Roof would be OK. Can lie the cans on their spine or get the squat ones. Strictly speaking you are meant to take them off the roof to fuel up... risk management may see people doing different things. Whether the service station would allow it is a different story. Cheers

  7. #67
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Avoca Beach
    Posts
    14,150
    Total Downloaded
    0
    You could always fill the 6.5 litre pressurised water tank with diesel. Probably more useful.
    Regards PhilipA

  8. #68
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Armstrong Creek, Qld
    Posts
    8,752
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by TB View Post
    There’s no obviously great place to carry extra diesel on the new Defender.
    There's no obvious place for extra on any new vehicle unless it's a 'tilly or after market.

  9. #69
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    The Hills.
    Posts
    19,160
    Total Downloaded
    152.79 MB
    Quote Originally Posted by Saitch View Post
    what's the issue? The Canning? Take a Jerry or two. A lot cheaper than $1500-$2000 for an auxiliary.
    Agreed, unless I was having it built as an expedition car from new, when it could all be amortised over the lease or loan or whatever. Jerries can be a PITA when it comes to storage, and this Defender doesn't have the room of the old one. It'll be interesting to see what the accessory mobs come up with.

    One thing I do like about long range tanks is being able to do an entire trip on city price fuel. Of course, that can apply to jerries as well.
    ​JayTee

    Nullus Anxietus

    Cancer is gender blind.

    2000 D2 TD5 Auto: Tins
    1994 D1 300TDi Manual: Dave
    1980 SIII Petrol Tray: Doris
    OKApotamus #74
    Nanocom, D2 TD5 only.

  10. #70
    JDNSW's Avatar
    JDNSW is online now RoverLord Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    29,509
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I think that the thing that may be being missed in this "small fuel tank" discussion is that it is quite possible that this new Defender has significantly better fuel consumption than its predecessor. It has an entirely new engine that had low emissions as a primary design criterion, it weighs less, and has significantly lower drag, so if it does not have lower consumption, the design has failed. (of course, you can blow this by towing an unstreamlined 3.5tonne palace!)

    Let's see how range is in reality once there are some actually on Australian roads.
    John

    JDNSW
    1986 110 County 3.9 diesel
    1970 2a 109 2.25 petrol

Page 7 of 8 FirstFirst ... 5678 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!