Page 3 of 12 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 114

Thread: Land Rover doesn't understand Australia - no ute !

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Brisbane,some of the time.
    Posts
    13,886
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by DiscoMick View Post
    It appears I probably can't get 12 bags of goat poo in the back of a new Defender wagon, so I guess I'm not their target market and we'll have to soldier on with our old 110. Land Rover doesn't understand Australia - no ute !
    Nah,you will have to wait a couple of months longer for the 130 wagon,it should have heaps of room.

    You may get more than 12 bags in it

    Let us know how you go

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Brisbane,some of the time.
    Posts
    13,886
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Someone sent me this today....

    Yes i know its all rigged


  3. #23
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    The Hills.
    Posts
    19,163
    Total Downloaded
    152.79 MB
    Quote Originally Posted by DazzaTD5 View Post
    And yet LR sales are dismal when compared to Toyota, Kia, Hyundai etc etc that DO make vehicles people want.
    Compare sales in target markets, rather than just blanket ones. In the UK, and EU, LR beats those brands hands down when comparing competing vehicles. Toyota, foe example, can't sell anything bearing the LandCruiser badge in the UK, because the things are too big. The LC 200 isn't even offered in most EU countries. This info is easily available online, BTW. Where is LRs biggest market, do you think?

    Quote Originally Posted by DazzaTD5 View Post
    Land Rover back in the 50's built a vehicle people wanted, a series I Land Rover.
    I don't see "successful" anywhere, it certainly isn't build quality, reliability nor sales.
    Maybe you mean customer support, which isnt horrific when compared to VW, Merc, Holden.
    In the 50s, there were awful Chev and Ford trucks. They worked, but do you know what conditions were like in outback Australia, in the North, in the Wet? Of course Land Rovers were popular with farmers. You also need to know that, after WWII, US dollars could not be had in this country ( I know, because my father was sole distributor for Evinrude motors, and he could no longer obtain them, due to currency restrictions { this is a whole new topic, but people should at least study a "little" history, don't you think?}), so Jeeps were not available.

    Are you seriously going to mention the almost dead Holden and customer support in the same sentence? Land Rover is in a way better situation than Holden. GM filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy. The US Fed bailed them out. 2008 maybe? Tata is doing just fine.

    Quote Originally Posted by DazzaTD5 View Post
    OK - Being able to access repair manuals, data, info etc etc is second to none from where I sit (you pay for the amount of access and for how long).
    I get this point, but how much access do you have to Benz manuals, or Prius, or Lambo, or Ferrari, or Rolls Royce, or HSV, or Lotus, or Lexus, or Infiniti, or pretty much any brand you care to mention? Simple answer; you don't, unless you are an accredited repairer. Why single out LR? They are all trying to protect intellectual property.

    I still maintain that LR is commercially more successful than they have been for more than 40 years. I don't like the cars they make these days any more than you do, but the market does, and so do the shareholders, which is the bottom line.

    I'll stick with my D2 and my SIII until I can afford an OKA. There is no LR as I knew it anymore, but I can let it go.
    ​JayTee

    Nullus Anxietus

    Cancer is gender blind.

    2000 D2 TD5 Auto: Tins
    1994 D1 300TDi Manual: Dave
    1980 SIII Petrol Tray: Doris
    OKApotamus #74
    Nanocom, D2 TD5 only.

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Perth Western Australia
    Posts
    2,638
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by johntins View Post

    I get this point, but how much access do you have to Benz manuals, or Prius, or Lambo, or Ferrari, or Rolls Royce, or HSV, or Lotus, or Lexus, or Infiniti, or pretty much any brand you care to mention? Simple answer; you don't, unless you are an accredited repairer. Why single out LR? They are all trying to protect intellectual property.

    There is no LR as I knew it anymore, but I can let it go.
    *John, I'm saying its one of Land Rovers few saving graces, being able to access (at a reasonable cost, which is fair enough) all info, manuals etc which is something pretty well most manufacturers dont do. It's almost like they support independent repairers, which is pretty good.

    *Toyota/Lexus also offer, again at a cost access to their diagnostic software, equipment, everything you need, there prices are right up there though. But access none the less.

    ***** brands such as VW, Merc, holden, GM offer little to zero support when it comes to accessing manuals etc.

    *I dont subscribe to the protecting intellectual property thing as once you have purchased a product, such as a car or a computer, you actually have everything there. All the parts both electronic and mechanical can all be worked out, sure it can be a long draw out pain in the arse, but it can be done.
    Regards
    Daz


  5. #25
    SBD4's Avatar
    SBD4 is offline A Keeper of the TGO Gold Subscriber
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Bundeena
    Posts
    2,809
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by DazzaTD5 View Post
    *John, I'm saying its one of Land Rovers few saving graces, being able to access (at a reasonable cost, which is fair enough) all info, manuals etc which is something pretty well most manufacturers dont do. It's almost like they support independent repairers, which is pretty good.

    *Toyota/Lexus also offer, again at a cost access to their diagnostic software, equipment, everything you need, there prices are right up there though. But access none the less.

    ***** brands such as VW, Merc, holden, GM offer little to zero support when it comes to accessing manuals etc.

    *I dont subscribe to the protecting intellectual property thing as once you have purchased a product, such as a car or a computer, you actually have everything there. All the parts both electronic and mechanical can all be worked out, sure it can be a long draw out pain in the arse, but it can be done.
    Yep, "Right to repair" is an issue across many sectors - heavy machinery and consumer electronics being big ones. Huge case going on in the US at the moment with manufacturers fighting all the way. The way JR do it is good and fair. They get something for providing the information and they don't stop people from doing their own repairs (or through someone like yourself).
    Cheers,

    Sean

    “Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former.” - Albert Einstein

  6. #26
    DiscoMick Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by scarry View Post
    Nah,you will have to wait a couple of months longer for the 130 wagon,it should have heaps of room.

    You may get more than 12 bags in it

    Let us know how you go
    Okay, but it will be December before I get to collect more goat poo from the rellies.

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    18,616
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I think LR understand the Australian market perfectly - but they are a small company and we are a small market and they have to maximise their return for their investment and that means catering for their major markets. Any investment in a ute (and it would have to be a dual cab ute) for Australia would just not be cost effective and probably a failure in economic terms.

    Garry
    REMLR 243

    2007 Range Rover Sport TDV6
    1977 FC 101
    1976 Jaguar XJ12C
    1973 Haflinger AP700
    1971 Jaguar V12 E-Type Series 3 Roadster
    1957 Series 1 88"
    1957 Series 1 88" Station Wagon

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    St Helena,Melbourne
    Posts
    16,770
    Total Downloaded
    1.13 MB
    The monocoque design has pretty much killed any idea of a ute although still possible engineering wise , if they had retained a chassis it would be easy to tool up for one.
    MY08 TDV6 SE D3- permagrin ooh yeah
    2004 Jayco Freedom tin tent
    1998 Triumph Daytona T595
    1974 VW Kombi bus
    1958 Holden FC special sedan

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Whyalla, SA
    Posts
    7,545
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by W&KO View Post
    I don’t reckon a farmer will be able torun his quad into the back of a defender wagon

    Just finished a job which needed me to deliver a 20m roll of 4” dry delivery hose to a gold mine, would have been a bitch getting it in and out of a wagon...good thing we still have real commercial vehicles available to get the job done.
    Your “real” working commercial vehicle wouldn’t be allowed on my site.

    Those days are gone, now all heavier work is LTs with safety systems.

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Whyalla, SA
    Posts
    7,545
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by loanrangie View Post
    The monocoque design has pretty much killed any idea of a ute although still possible engineering wise , if they had retained a chassis it would be easy to tool up for one.
    Nah, they did it with Holdens and Fords, it’s not hard to do.

    Just the economics. Australia is NOT progressive, we are a backwards society, stuck on old ways and self indulgent arrogance.

    Ask any Aussie a while back, an Aussie family vehicle needed to be RWD, big, boofy etc - Not some FWD thing! Yet the Yanks were pumping them out.

    We all need a Ute- yet most Tradies O/S use Vans. Tradies buy a Ute fit a canopy, trailer etc. but it was the Aussie thing.

    Even if ALL the Primary producers placed an order for a Ute... it wouldn’t even total 0.05% of global sales.



    Let’s also take a look at the comments of others along the lines of “Kia etc sell vehicles people want”.
    And let’s phrase it correctly - “Kia etc well vehicle’s people see value in aligned to their budget”

    Many want the Premium Brands, it’s more a case they are not “brand fans” and will go features/value or economic drivers.

    Also, companies like Toyota sell shed loads of vehicles - Corolla, Camry etc making up the principal volumes - let’s leave them off the comparisons as they skew figures and not relevant to (I have this TLA) SUVs or offroad capable vehicles.

Page 3 of 12 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!