Compare sales in target markets, rather than just blanket ones. In the UK, and EU, LR beats those brands hands down when comparing competing vehicles. Toyota, foe example, can't sell anything bearing the LandCruiser badge in the UK, because the things are too big. The LC 200 isn't even offered in most EU countries. This info is easily available online, BTW. Where is LRs biggest market, do you think?
In the 50s, there were awful Chev and Ford trucks. They worked, but do you know what conditions were like in outback Australia, in the North, in the Wet? Of course Land Rovers were popular with farmers. You also need to know that, after WWII, US dollars could not be had in this country ( I know, because my father was sole distributor for Evinrude motors, and he could no longer obtain them, due to currency restrictions { this is a whole new topic, but people should at least study a "little" history, don't you think?}), so Jeeps were not available.
Are you seriously going to mention the almost dead Holden and customer support in the same sentence? Land Rover is in a way better situation than Holden. GM filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy. The US Fed bailed them out. 2008 maybe? Tata is doing just fine.
I get this point, but how much access do you have to Benz manuals, or Prius, or Lambo, or Ferrari, or Rolls Royce, or HSV, or Lotus, or Lexus, or Infiniti, or pretty much any brand you care to mention? Simple answer; you don't, unless you are an accredited repairer. Why single out LR? They are all trying to protect intellectual property.
I still maintain that LR is commercially more successful than they have been for more than 40 years. I don't like the cars they make these days any more than you do, but the market does, and so do the shareholders, which is the bottom line.
I'll stick with my D2 and my SIII until I can afford an OKA. There is no LR as I knew it anymore, but I can let it go.
JayTee
Nullus Anxietus
Cancer is gender blind.
2000 D2 TD5 Auto: Tins
1994 D1 300TDi Manual: Dave
1980 SIII Petrol Tray: Doris
OKApotamus #74
Nanocom, D2 TD5 only.
*John, I'm saying its one of Land Rovers few saving graces, being able to access (at a reasonable cost, which is fair enough) all info, manuals etc which is something pretty well most manufacturers dont do. It's almost like they support independent repairers, which is pretty good.
*Toyota/Lexus also offer, again at a cost access to their diagnostic software, equipment, everything you need, there prices are right up there though. But access none the less.
***** brands such as VW, Merc, holden, GM offer little to zero support when it comes to accessing manuals etc.
*I dont subscribe to the protecting intellectual property thing as once you have purchased a product, such as a car or a computer, you actually have everything there. All the parts both electronic and mechanical can all be worked out, sure it can be a long draw out pain in the arse, but it can be done.
Regards
Daz
Yep, "Right to repair" is an issue across many sectors - heavy machinery and consumer electronics being big ones. Huge case going on in the US at the moment with manufacturers fighting all the way. The way JR do it is good and fair. They get something for providing the information and they don't stop people from doing their own repairs (or through someone like yourself).
Cheers,
Sean
“Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former.” - Albert Einstein
I think LR understand the Australian market perfectly - but they are a small company and we are a small market and they have to maximise their return for their investment and that means catering for their major markets. Any investment in a ute (and it would have to be a dual cab ute) for Australia would just not be cost effective and probably a failure in economic terms.
Garry
REMLR 243
2007 Range Rover Sport TDV6
1977 FC 101
1976 Jaguar XJ12C
1973 Haflinger AP700
1971 Jaguar V12 E-Type Series 3 Roadster
1957 Series 1 88"
1957 Series 1 88" Station Wagon
The monocoque design has pretty much killed any idea of a ute although still possible engineering wise , if they had retained a chassis it would be easy to tool up for one.
MY08 TDV6 SE D3- permagrin ooh yeah
2004 Jayco Freedom tin tent
1998 Triumph Daytona T595
1974 VW Kombi bus
1958 Holden FC special sedan
Nah, they did it with Holdens and Fords, it’s not hard to do.
Just the economics. Australia is NOT progressive, we are a backwards society, stuck on old ways and self indulgent arrogance.
Ask any Aussie a while back, an Aussie family vehicle needed to be RWD, big, boofy etc - Not some FWD thing! Yet the Yanks were pumping them out.
We all need a Ute- yet most Tradies O/S use Vans. Tradies buy a Ute fit a canopy, trailer etc. but it was the Aussie thing.
Even if ALL the Primary producers placed an order for a Ute... it wouldn’t even total 0.05% of global sales.
Let’s also take a look at the comments of others along the lines of “Kia etc sell vehicles people want”.
And let’s phrase it correctly - “Kia etc well vehicle’s people see value in aligned to their budget”
Many want the Premium Brands, it’s more a case they are not “brand fans” and will go features/value or economic drivers.
Also, companies like Toyota sell shed loads of vehicles - Corolla, Camry etc making up the principal volumes - let’s leave them off the comparisons as they skew figures and not relevant to (I have this TLA) SUVs or offroad capable vehicles.
| Search AULRO.com ONLY! | Search All the Web! | 
|---|
|  |  | 
Bookmarks