Good point except the little petrol (like the one in the video above) have been in use in other LR and Jag platforms for several years. Also LR carry on more than anyone else with the PR machine bull**** about their extensive product torture testing and yet the consumer is still the real product tester.
Cheers
Getting off topic slightly,and not the vehicle that you were referring to,
I wouldn't call the latest D5 a new model release.
I looked at it extensively to replace the D4.
Three years down the track,there are still silly stupid issues,one after another.You don't have too look far on UK forums to find out all about it.
Admittedly,this wasn't the only reason we didn't purchase one.
Maybe the link in these two vehicles is them being built in Slovakia?
Its a shame really as LR do produce some well designed and engineered vehicles.
I think it may be more to do with modern demands on vehicle OS.
Sometimes it just seems to go wrong
Remember Toyota smashed the 100 series across the globe, and then had thousands of engine and suspension problems - often catastrophic failures.
For a company that size, full of spin on being unbreakable, that’s some horrendous outcomes.
The most improved player in the game has been Mitsubishi in recent years. And they’re multitudes of funding better off than LR
 ChatterBox
					
					
						Subscriber
					
					
						ChatterBox
					
					
						SubscriberLol, pretty much every part I have to replace on these, inc RRs and D3, Defender Puma etc, that have very early failures are stamped FoMoCo.
About 20 years ago the Ford agent workshop in Broome I worked at was swamped with warranty failures .
Ford has never been renowned for quality, this is well known in the trade.
 Wizard
					
					
						Wizard
					
					
                                        
					
					
						That is not apples to apples. Most other brands build vehicles that are reliable and do not fail even with new models. I've never had a new vehicle with a failure during warranty, ever. 100% of people I know that have purchased a new Land Rover in the last 10 years have had multiple warranty claims. The average being four per year.
Some seem to forget,there was a test by LR of the new D3,in its day,in East Africa.This was to show the world what a great vehicle it was.
After one shallow creek crossing they all had issues,some broke down completely .There were also numerous other problems.
I know someone that was invited to the release,he still can’t believe what actually happened and the issues they had.
He was invited by the local LR dealer,as he ran a fleet of LR’s at the time.His family ran a game park.
Now he runs a fleet of another brand,apart from an old Seires 2,which spends most of its time in the shed.
So it’s not what someone’s daughter,uncle or brother said,this actually happened.
To LR’s credit,they did do numerous improvements to the model,over the next few years.And then the D4 came along and was a further improvement.
You’re a lucky man.
I’ve had new Fords, Holden’s, Toyota’s, Mazda, Nissan’s and all have had something sorted during warranty.
Only vehicle that didn’t have any claims during warranty was the Isuzu - back then it was so basic there wasn’t anything to produce a claim!
The D4 has been the best of anything, only claims being a dash squeak and a seat bolster (and I was a big guy so likely my fault).
In all fairness, none have left me sitting on the side of the road during warranty.
The only warranty issue I had with the D2 from new was I got the cup holder stuck open. Thankfully it didn’t get stuck closed else that would have been a show stopper.
| Search AULRO.com ONLY! | Search All the Web! | 
|---|
|  |  | 
Bookmarks