Just to put the situation in perspective -
1. Most states now have legislation to prevent insurers from evading payment of claims where the insured's transgression has nothing to do with the claim - and unless the claim is related to the modification (e.g. gas leak resulted in fire), and even then they would have nothing to stand on if they had been notified of the fitting. Although they might try to recover from the fitter's insurer. It is difficult to see how a failure to comply with emissions standards could result in a claim, and most gas system suppliers claim improved emissions results anyway.
2. The number of gas fumigation vehicles which may be technically non-compliant would be miniscule compared to the number that have had the fuelling modified without the new chip being submitted for compliance testing. And in most of these cases emissions would have been increased - but any insurance implications would certainly not come from the fact that the new fuelling scheme has not been submitted for compliance testing.
Certainly in most if not all states and territories the days of insurers rejecting claims for irrelevant reasons are long gone - occasionally they will try it, but it is pure bluff.
John
				
			 
			
		 
			
				
			
			
				John
JDNSW
1986 110 County 3.9 diesel
1970 2a 109 2.25 petrol
			
			
		 
	
Bookmarks