Page 7 of 11 FirstFirst ... 56789 ... LastLast
Results 61 to 70 of 106

Thread: D-gas versus Dieselgas

  1. #61
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Wheelers Hill, Melbourne
    Posts
    4,085
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Have a look at the AAFRB website- Automotive Alternative Fuels Registration Board (AAFR
    Click on Industry news & more at the bottom of the page
    Look at the latest newsletter Winter 2008

    This newsletter says none of the fumigation systems - that they are aware of- have been submitted for emission compliance to the Aust Standard and the fitting of them may render a vehicle unroadworthy and therefore uninsurable.
    Sorry to point that one out.

  2. #62
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    591
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I found it highly unlikely that the government would pay us to fit something illegal. After 5 seconds of research I came up with this


    See below.

    "The emission standards were introduced via two new series of ADRs, which apply to vehicles depending on their gross vehicle mass (GVM):

    * ADR79/00, ADR79/01, and ADR79/02 for light-duty vehicles at or below 3.5 t GVM (replacing ADR37/01)
    * ADR80/00, ADR80/01, ADR80/02, and ADR80/03 for heavy-duty vehicles above 3.5 t GVM (replacing ADR70/00)

    The new ADRs apply to new vehicles fueled with petrol, diesel, as well as with LPG or natural gas, with an implementation schedule from 2002/3 to 2010/11. The requirements are summarized in Table 1 (the requirements and dates for heavy LPG and NG vehicles are the same as for diesel).

    The two year date combinations shown in the table refer to the dates applicable to new model vehicles and all model vehicles, respectively. For example, in the case of 02/03, this means that from 1 January 2002 any new model first produced with a date of manufacture after 1 January 2002 must comply with the ADR, and from 1 January 2003 all new vehicles (regardless of the first production date for that particular model) must comply."



    SO it only applied from 2003 vehicles onwards.

  3. #63
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Wheelers Hill, Melbourne
    Posts
    4,085
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Iain_B View Post
    I found it highly unlikely that the government would pay us to fit something illegal. After 5 seconds of research I came up with this


    See below.

    "The emission standards were introduced via two new series of ADRs, which apply to vehicles depending on their gross vehicle mass (GVM):

    * ADR79/00, ADR79/01, and ADR79/02 for light-duty vehicles at or below 3.5 t GVM (replacing ADR37/01)
    * ADR80/00, ADR80/01, ADR80/02, and ADR80/03 for heavy-duty vehicles above 3.5 t GVM (replacing ADR70/00)

    The new ADRs apply to new vehicles fueled with petrol, diesel, as well as with LPG or natural gas, with an implementation schedule from 2002/3 to 2010/11. The requirements are summarized in Table 1 (the requirements and dates for heavy LPG and NG vehicles are the same as for diesel).

    The two year date combinations shown in the table refer to the dates applicable to new model vehicles and all model vehicles, respectively. For example, in the case of 02/03, this means that from 1 January 2002 any new model first produced with a date of manufacture after 1 January 2002 must comply with the ADR, and from 1 January 2003 all new vehicles (regardless of the first production date for that particular model) must comply."



    SO it only applied from 2003 vehicles onwards.
    Yes, that extract applies to new vehicles.

    Anything there about offering a commercial conversion that will alter emissions?
    It does'nt surprise me that one Gov't dept has no idea what another does.

  4. #64
    JDNSW's Avatar
    JDNSW is online now RoverLord Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    29,511
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Just to put the situation in perspective -

    1. Most states now have legislation to prevent insurers from evading payment of claims where the insured's transgression has nothing to do with the claim - and unless the claim is related to the modification (e.g. gas leak resulted in fire), and even then they would have nothing to stand on if they had been notified of the fitting. Although they might try to recover from the fitter's insurer. It is difficult to see how a failure to comply with emissions standards could result in a claim, and most gas system suppliers claim improved emissions results anyway.

    2. The number of gas fumigation vehicles which may be technically non-compliant would be miniscule compared to the number that have had the fuelling modified without the new chip being submitted for compliance testing. And in most of these cases emissions would have been increased - but any insurance implications would certainly not come from the fact that the new fuelling scheme has not been submitted for compliance testing.

    Certainly in most if not all states and territories the days of insurers rejecting claims for irrelevant reasons are long gone - occasionally they will try it, but it is pure bluff.

    John
    John

    JDNSW
    1986 110 County 3.9 diesel
    1970 2a 109 2.25 petrol

  5. #65
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Safety Bay
    Posts
    8,041
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Just a quick heads up,My defender has been driven hard,I'm trying to get it to knock or have a drama but it hasn't even looked like having a problem with a 40thou gas jet,anyway I has returned after 1600k's 135ltrs of diesel and 40 ltrs gas in a mix of town,open road driving.That amount includes playing with the set-up and test driving etc and me giving it a hard time.The engine pulls stronger from any gear,very noticeable in third and fourth,in fourth it is limited by the gearing and I past a three trailer road train on friday in fifth from 80 up to 120 and it pulled past no drama's.It is early days and a tune is happening in a week or two but I'm likeing the gas more and more.I'll post up the dyno sheet and give it a few more tanks and post up the results. Pat

  6. #66
    harryw Guest
    You would have to be happy with return 8.4 litres per 100k, although the LPG @29% is a bit on the high side according to the installer I used.

  7. #67
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Safety Bay
    Posts
    8,041
    Total Downloaded
    0
    It's early days.It has spent a fair time at idle which would help the diesel side but it will get a tune on both shortly. Pat

  8. #68
    Wilbur Guest
    Hi Pat,

    Have you had the dyno bit done yet? Very interested to learn of your results.

    Cheers,

    Paul

  9. #69
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Safety Bay
    Posts
    8,041
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Mate done already.See my thread Dyno results D/gas. Pat

  10. #70
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Kiwiland
    Posts
    7,246
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by PAT303 View Post
    Mate done already.See my thread Dyno results D/gas. Pat
    Any hints on where that might be?

Page 7 of 11 FirstFirst ... 56789 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!