Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 22 of 22

Thread: one view on the ROPS system

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Brisbane, Inner East.
    Posts
    11,178
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Interesting that a ROPS or FOPS structure on industrial plant like earthmoving equipment has to be tested and certified before it can be called such. Not economic or practical for one offs by small engineering works. This is the reason for the disappearance of the traditional (and operator preferred) scrub canopy from new bulldozers. A lawyer's picnic if an operator was injured beneath an uncertified canopy.
    URSUSMAJOR

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    East-South-East Girt-By-Sea
    Posts
    17,662
    Total Downloaded
    1.20 MB
    We all feel like avoiding the dialogue on forums at times, on the other hand if we don't have some experts around the place then all we may be left with is inexperienced, unqualified and know-it-alls.

    Not that qualifications are the be all and end all of knowledge, there are a lot of people around the place who recieved their qualificatons from the university of life, they know what works and what doesn't which is valuable, however some topics need better or more concise information that that.

    You won't find me on: faceplant; Scipe; Infragam; LumpedIn; ShapCnat or Twitting. I'm just not that interesting.

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!