Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 28

Thread: 200TDi Build

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Torquay Victoria
    Posts
    376
    Total Downloaded
    0

    200TDi Build


    Well there are some 200 Tdi builds on here so not sure how this one will fair, mine a series 3 shorty, which will get a stage 1 front axel and as for the rear one not sure yet. I do have the stage one rear salisbury and also a Rang Rover differential. while the Salsibury is bomb proof I would like to avoid engineering certification complexities and alterations. I have been informed that the 3.54 differentials having thicker teeth do stand up better than their finer lobed 4.11 cousins. This being espeacially so in a SWB variant which is lighter and thus placing less load on the teeth. Thoughts appreciated I am not going to thrash it hard but i will be driving it.

    I have a Torro overdrive and rebuilt gearbox or the choice of a high speed transfer case also with a rebuilt gearbox. It seems you end up with much the same ratio in top gear it seems and as for longevity the Torro overdrive are fare better than than a Fairly it seems. Which one should I use am not sure so hoping some people could assist with advise on the pros and cons of putting in one or the other. Will run 10.5 x 15 Game rims I just like the look of them on shortys, it gives them a bit of bull doggy squatness.

    Added to this mix is this
    a VNT Garrett turbo, this is the same one as fitted to the 2.8 Brazian engines so I expect it to add a bit more to the low to mid range torque.
    I have pondered the Stage 1 3" brakes but wondered if the 11" rears on the LWB fitted both front and rear would suffice. My concern with fitting the 3" drums up front is the in a SWB the wheels are just to close and the SWB so light (c.f LWthat the front will lock up consistantly. Thoughts on this would be go, I do like to stop safely.

    As for the suspension I have got a set of parabolics which I had on a previous car these in a shorty are great, makes the ride so much more comfortable. As for the body not sure likely to end up with anything as I have a station wagion body, ute body, ute rag top and a full hoop set for a convertabl. But first thought it best to get the mechanicals down.
    So that about it for now that I can think of, any thoughts greatly appreciated any oversights thankfully excepted to making it a good daily driver. here one last photo of how it sits in the chassis.
    Last edited by Lotz-A-Landies; 30th March 2011 at 02:34 PM. Reason: Fix redundant image codes.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Birmingham England
    Posts
    237
    Total Downloaded
    0
    i've fitted the 200tdi in my 88" bitsa with the standard turbo/manifold set up, modified the radiator panel to carry the discovery radiator and intercooler, fitted disco 3.54 diffs and a fairey overdrive along with 7.50x16 Super All Grips (potential for 90mph with this gearing)....

    i'm still running the standard 10" single line non servo'd brakes at present but i do have a dual line servo set up sat on the shelf ready for when i hunt down a rear 109" axle to rob the backplates and drums off ....

    i'll be leaving the standard rear drums and slave cylinders on my rear axle as i feel there's enough braking power there due to the rear being so light and just fitting the 109" parts to my front axle (11" single leading shoes) which with the servo assistance i feel should give more than enough braking power ....

    the reason(s) i'm going this way is that my 88" won't have increased in weight by much if any so shouldn't really need a brake upgrade if driven as a landy was originally designed to be driven (i've been driving on the 10" fitment for about 15months now)...

    the second reason for not upgrading any higher is that the final limitation to your stopping power is the traction your tyres will have on the surface (no matter how good your brakes are, if the tyres don't grip you won't stop any faster) ....

    the only downside (?) with having a more powerful engine is you can maintain a higher travelling speed which will increase your braking distance which means you need to maintain a greater braking distance between yourself and anything in front (always look and think ahead)....

    i've no idea about Ashcroft high ratio transfer gears as i've not used them, the only thing i've heard is that they are the better option rather than fitting 3.54 diffs due to keeping your low ratio gearing nice and low for offroad exercises....

    my Bitsa is my first landrover and i've only owned it about 20 months so i'm no expert, this is just my thoughts and present day experiences (my disclaimer because i'm no expert )

    my next build i'm starting is my '65 109" van bodied 2a, going to be getting a 200tdi with 300tdi manifolds/turbo, 4.3:1 diffs (lower ratio for towing) and overdrive, just finished repairing the replacement bulkhead so it'll be a while before i'm driving that one

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Torquay Victoria
    Posts
    376
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by NiteMare View Post
    i've fitted the 200tdi in my 88" bitsa with the standard turbo/manifold set up, modified the radiator panel to carry the discovery radiator and intercooler, fitted disco 3.54 diffs and a fairey overdrive along with 7.50x16 Super All Grips (potential for 90mph with this gearing)....

    i'm still running the standard 10" single line non servo'd brakes at present but i do have a dual line servo set up sat on the shelf ready for when i hunt down a rear 109" axle to rob the backplates and drums off ....

    i'll be leaving the standard rear drums and slave cylinders on my rear axle as i feel there's enough braking power there due to the rear being so light and just fitting the 109" parts to my front axle (11" single leading shoes) which with the servo assistance i feel should give more than enough braking power ....


    the reason(s) i'm going this way is that my 88" won't have increased in weight by much if any so shouldn't really need a brake upgrade if driven as a landy was originally designed to be driven (i've been driving on the 10" fitment for about 15months now)...

    the second reason for not upgrading any higher is that the final limitation to your stopping power is the traction your tyres will have on the surface (no matter how good your brakes are, if the tyres don't grip you won't stop any faster) ....

    the only downside (?) with having a more powerful engine is you can maintain a higher travelling speed which will increase your braking distance which means you need to maintain a greater braking distance between yourself and anything in front (always look and think ahead)....
    Read your post good points made regarding the braking, I have the option of quiet a few different setups, so will see what people thoughts are I think boosted for sure but as for the configuration not so sure.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Hervey Bay
    Posts
    62
    Total Downloaded
    0
    So how has the conversion gone so far as in the motor sitting in the mounts etc and how is the room going to be around the turbo???

    I may be interested in what ever is left after you decide wich gearing road you will take too.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Narrogin WA
    Posts
    3,092
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by NiteMare View Post
    ...my next build i'm starting is my '65 109" van bodied 2a, going to be getting a 200tdi with 300tdi manifolds/turbo, ...
    Tell me more about the 300tdi manifold NiteMare.

    I have heard that it fits the 200tdi head - does it also solve the clearance with the chassis problem?

    I have a 200 tdi engine for my S3, so it would be nice to know all of the options,

    Cheers Charlie

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Torquay Victoria
    Posts
    376
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Muckinhell View Post
    So how has the conversion gone so far as in the motor sitting in the mounts etc and how is the room going to be around the turbo???

    I may be interested in what ever is left after you decide wich gearing road you will take too.
    As far as the motor sitting in the chassis it is fine there are two locating points for the engine mount. Use the front ones,

    just remember to bolt the brackets and mounts on the injector side to the block first or you will not get the mount on easily.

    Or at least I had great issues otherwise the engine sits like it is suppose to be there.

    Had to remove a locating plug and 1 stud also on the fly wheel housing, then drill and tap treads for four new studs. I did have to put 4 High Tensile bolts on the bottom of the flywheel housing and these were internal hex head ones which were counter sunk into the Flywheel housing. Best to fit up the gearbox and motor then drill the tapped holes as you are more likely to get better holes to tap. All up about 2-3 hours labour including and she was ready to bolt up.
    Last edited by Lotz-A-Landies; 30th March 2011 at 02:32 PM. Reason: Fix redundant image codes

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Torquay Victoria
    Posts
    376
    Total Downloaded
    0
    As for the turbo at first attempt I was cussing the turbo setup as the exhaust was going to have to do a 180 degree turn the exit down the side of the chassis. The outlet was facing toward the quarter panel and just to top it off the air inlet was two thirds covered by the PS foot well. After a cuppa and a bit of contemplation the light came on, pivot it around and see what can be achieved. Luckily these turbo are a three bolt exhaust flange with the holes spaced equally apart, so it was that I pivoted it one third a turn and then spun the air intake around till it looked right.


    So this is the rough in of the turbo fitment exhuast points down wards, the air outlet points to front and the air inlet up and towards the firewall.
    Last edited by Lotz-A-Landies; 30th March 2011 at 02:28 PM. Reason: fix redundant image codes

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Birmingham England
    Posts
    237
    Total Downloaded
    0
    this is both of the 300 manifolds bolted to my 200Tdi engine, make sure you get the oil lines and adaptors as you need to mix and match the connections..
    you also need the longer studs that the 300 uses as the mounting faces are thicker...
    get the 300 dipstick and tube in case it will fit your engine block, i had to reuse the 200 dipstick and tube and carefully rebend the tube to fit round the turbo...
    i've also got the 300 intercooler which has the one port in a different place and apparently eases fitment...
    this mix of parts has been done quite a few times in this country to get the engine into the 109 chassis without cutting a scoop into it, my engine is still sat on the floor as i've only just finished repairing my spare bulkhead which now needs media blasting and painting before i pull Big Ears apart

    anyway here's the poor quality picture


    another thing to beware of in the 88" chassis is the front crank pulley can strike the axle tube on heavy landings and chip chunks out of it if you have the cast iron pulley, which i expect would eventually damage the crank


    i put 3.5 mm thick spacers/washers above and below the engine mounting rubbers after i found that damage giving a 7mm lift to the engine, i also put my pulley in the lathe and completely removed the rear Vee, i also turned a couple of MM off the front belt lip, since these modifications i've had no evidence of striking



    you can also fit the standard Series alternator mount straight to the 200 engine block which with a 32mm thick spacer between the block and mount will allow you to fit a 200tdi alternator, it still doesn't line up with the engine pulley at that so i fitted a double pulley on the alternator and "bob's your mothers brother", this gave me the required space for induction and cooling pipes at the top of the engine in my 88", i will be attempting to fit the alt' on the stock aluminium casting in my 109 in the hope that i won't be dunking it quite so often when "greenlaning" (unsurfaced roads) or in "pay and play" pits, i killed 3 alt's in about 12 months thru dirt and water getting in them

    anyway ask away and i'll help if i can

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Torquay Victoria
    Posts
    376
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by NiteMare View Post
    i put 3.5 mm thick spacers/washers above and below the engine mounting rubbers after i found that damage giving a 7mm lift to the engine, i also put my pulley in the lathe and completely removed the rear Vee, i also turned a couple of MM off the front belt lip
    ask away and i'll help if i can
    UMM that one I had not considered do you think extended shackles would do the the job if using parabolics they generally add about 50mm.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Birmingham England
    Posts
    237
    Total Downloaded
    0
    i doubt i would use "extended shackles" as that may alter the diff angle too much and destroy UJ's on a regular basis, if anything the most i would go is standard 109 shackles as they are only 1/2" longer (by memory) extended shackles were designed to go with the extended dumb irons on 1 ton and military "combat" chassis...

    the thing to possibly consider is that parabolics "may" flex further upwards (i dunno) than standard leaves so i'd still keep an eye open for clashing

    to be honest it still wouldn't hurt to put the pulley in a lathe for insurance against damage, it was only a short time turning it, just wear a mask as it comes off almost as dust being cast iron

    by the way, don't take anything i say as the only way and 100% accurate, i've only had Land Rovers about 20 months so i'm only learning myself, i have experimented quite a bit and also done quite a bit of research when doing my conversion, i'm a reasonably competent spannerman but i'm not formally trained (built almost everything from mopeds to HGV's in the past tho), most of my skills are self taught as and when i've had the desire or need to learn them

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!