Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 35

Thread: which P38 ?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Bundaberg Qld
    Posts
    7,036
    Total Downloaded
    0

    which P38 ?

    Just thinking out loud ATM but if one was to look at getting a P38, what year/model/drivelines should I be looking for ??

    I have had a couple of RRCs as my DD before and currently the wife and I both have D1s. Although Nan loves her V8 auto, I find mine (V8 manual) uncomfortable on trips and was contemplating going back to a Rangie.

    The RRC has always been my favourite but was thinking what about these P38s. You hear some horror stories but you get that with most cars/models .

    Any do's or (constructive) dont's are more than welcome.

    T.I.A.

    Paul

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Williamstown, Victoria
    Posts
    749
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I had an '89 classic for 7 years before moving on to my current 2001 HSE P38.
    It is a big move up from the classic with all the modern electronics, air suspension, nice interior and drive.
    Owning a classic is a great primer to owning a P38, it will make sense mechanically if you like to do your own maintenence.
    Of course with any complicated vehicle, there are more things to go wrong, fortunately most of those are small annoying problems, most of which can be fixed yourself with help from this forum and rangerovers.net
    Personally, I would be looking at the updated version that came in about mid 1999, it has the highly regarded thor engine management system, you can identify them with the clear front indicators.
    A faultmate is a must, that thing has been a huge help to me in diagnosing problems. Also the rave manual is a must have.
    You can read about P38's and thier faults as much as you like, but ultimately, when you get behind the wheel, you'll know why so many of us persist with them!
    The big thing with any Range Rover is maintenance. If you are able to maintain it yourself, that is the key to keeping costs reasonable.
    I have done virtually every job so far myself, which is nice to know it wasn't done by a first year apprentice in a mechanics shop somewhere.
    I have collected a nice array of quality tools now, which makes things much more bearable when you are underneath and covered in grease!
    Good luck with the P38 hunting.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Douglas Park, NSW
    Posts
    9,347
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by PeterH View Post
    updated version that came in about mid 1999, it has the highly regarded thor engine management system, you can identify them with the clear front indicators.
    Thor came out in the 1999MY with orange indicator lenses. They went white/clear in 2000MY.
    Scott

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Coogee, South of Fremantle, WA
    Posts
    1,550
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Peter is pretty bang on with his advice, Get a Thor if your budget can stretch, thats not to say the earlier cars are not worth considering. 4 wheel traction control,Stronger front diff, more torque, better KPL Bosch engine management is what you pay more for. 2000my cars have different lights front rear and fog. Maintenance is paramount, parts are relatively cheap but If you cant turn a spanner yourself then forget it. Cooling system must be 100% Air suspension can be challenging but fixable

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Townsville, QLD
    Posts
    2,581
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Yeah definitely happy with my '99 Bosch HSE. It's been faultless for me (excluding the alternator the day I bought it and crank position sensor a year later - things that could happen to any commodore or falcon, not specifically a P38).

    It's taken me over 40,000 lovely kilometers over 4yrs, through Cape York (where I towed 3t of classic Range Rover back through Lakefield to Cairns), through the goldfields and everywhere in between, it lives in touring mode and sees nothing but low range every time! Certainly is an adventure machine! Brings back better fuel consumption than the V8 Commodore it replaced!

    Wouldn't change it for quids! Luxury, performance, great towing ability, excellent 4wd capability - what more could you ask!

    Cheers
    Keithy

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Gosford, NSW, Australia
    Posts
    2,556
    Total Downloaded
    0
    HI

    Great advice here, my 1999 HSE 4.6 is a true luxury beast and I love it

    The only other thing I can suggest is get one with an LPG injection system fitted

    Good luck
    Steve

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Bundaberg Qld
    Posts
    7,036
    Total Downloaded
    0
    The general lean appears to be toward the 4.6. Is there any issues with the 4.0 other than that "there is no substitute for cubic inches"

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    On The Road
    Posts
    30,031
    Total Downloaded
    0
    if memory serves the last 4.6's were more powerful- wheres that wiki page--
    "
    The final version, used in the Range Rover, produced 222 hp (166 kW) at 4,750 rpm and 300 ft•lbf (407 Nm) at 2,600 rpm"


    oh,, and the 4L will drop a liner,,,
    "How long since you've visited The Good Oil?"

    '93 V8 Rossi
    '97 to '07. sold.
    '01 V8 D2
    '06 to 10. written off.
    '03 4.6 V8 HSE D2a with Tornado ECM
    '10 to '21
    '16.5 RRS SDV8
    '21 to Infinity and Beyond!


    1988 Isuzu Bus. V10 15L NA Diesel
    Home is where you park it..

    [IMG][/IMG]

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Victoria
    Posts
    1,777
    Total Downloaded
    0
    If contemplating a P38 then I think the only choice is the full disaster - a Vogue model. Might as well have all the luxuries the P38 can offer.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    3,234
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Pedro_The_Swift View Post
    if memory serves the last 4.6's were more powerful- wheres that wiki page--
    "
    The final version, used in the Range Rover, produced 222 hp (166 kW) at 4,750 rpm and 300 ft•lbf (407 Nm) at 2,600 rpm"


    oh,, and the 4L will drop a liner,,,
    Not sure the 166kw version of the 4.6 ever came here in the P38. May have been in the last of the D2s. IIRC all the 4.6 and 4.0 engines in the P38 models had the low compression version (8.37:1) which in the P38 was about 10-12 kw less than the high compression version.... an extra 10-12kw would be handy... especially on long ascending grades..
    MY99 RR P38 HSE 4.6 (Thor) gone (to Tasmania)
    2020 Subaru Impreza S ('SWMBO's Express' )
    2023 Ineos Grenadier Trialmaster (diesel)

Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!