Originally Posted by
PaulP38a
Not very kind Coasting, and I suspect you've taken Dave's remarks a bit out of context.
I think Dave was stating that his contacts mainly use the Windows Live/MSN Messenger IM products rather than the more general statement of Windows as an O/S platform. Sure there may be "better" IM products out there, but often corporates and even small businesses restrict the use of IM products to those they are willing to support, if they permit external-facing IM at all.
Skype is a great product I agree (and I use it too sometimes) but as far as I know it does not permit interoperability with other IM products such as Windows Live IM (which I also use sometimes).
Skype has its fair share of vulnerabilities too... do a Google search and you'll see what I mean. :eek:
Free IM products that offer value-add services (chat, VOIP, games and adverts) are inherently insecure. It is up to the end user to practice "safe software" by restricting incoming network ports, application level filtering, intrusion detection and anti-virus/malware scanning.:confused:
BTW: not wanting to start a religious war but LINUX and Mac are not invulnerable either... they are less common and therefore less targeted than Windows, that's all. Not better, not worse, just different with a much smaller installed base. Don't flame me - I run them all, it's part of what I do for a living. I don't care what you run, but don't assume it is better than the others... and if you do decide to flame anyway, keep these words in mind...
"to be absolutely certain of something, you must know absolutely everything about it, or absolutely nothing"... (I like to keep that one on hand when other 4WD'ers pay out on Landies and Rangies) ;)
Aussie - I've added you to my IM contacts.
Cheers, Paul.