Page 6 of 12 FirstFirst ... 45678 ... LastLast
Results 51 to 60 of 112

Thread: 55t press

  1. #51
    slug_burner is offline TopicToaster Gold Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    4,024
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Now that the 100x16 wont see the full 55t (413kn) It should bring it back to 303kn/1600mm2 = 189.375mpa. Is this looking better? I guess I can make more boltable cross ties to help with buckling of the 100x16 flat bar (again not wanting to weld them togther.)
    I can't see your 100 x 16 FB uprights buckling as they are in tension when your press actuator is expanding (pressing donw onto the table) Only time that buckling would be an issue would be if you placed the FB into compression.

    The only thing the bolts holding the 75x12 FB to the 100x16 FB will be doing is preventing buckling of the 100x16 FB uprights (wobbling or going trapezoidal) under the weight of the table and head beams and hydraulic actuator.

    Not my specialty so wait for one of the mechies to give their view before you act on the above.

  2. #52
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Gold Coast
    Posts
    5,101
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I can visualise the flat bar being in tention between the head beam and table when pressing. But I would have thought that with the downward pressure on the table that below table height the FB to be under compression?

    Some Bolt info: John was saying that M20 is about the biggest you will commonly see in structural steel conections due to the fact that the guys installing it only have Podge and impact wrench to torque up. Going past M20 requires more torque and more equipment.

    M6 fine and coarse. I tried 2 local fastener suppliers, both saying that in M6 there is only one pitch. That being M6 x 1.0 metric coarse. Not that M6 metric fine does not exist, but that you can only buy bolts in M6 x 1.0...very few applications for M6 fine. Seems that there is a bigger range in UNC/UNF stuff than metric....

  3. #53
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Burnie, Tasmania
    Posts
    155
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I was trying to explain why the load is only kept up the top in words, but I figured a diagram is easier. I hope this helps, if it doesn't make sense, I can probably explain it a bit easier...

    Basically though, the force from the press stays in the top section of the frame, between the table and the head. The only forces which act below this point should be self weight. There are diagrams and equations attached if it helps to make more sense. You are correct that below the table will be in compression, but it's negligible, as far as I can tell.

    Hopefully the attachment works too!

    -Martin
    Attached Files Attached Files

  4. #54
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Burnie, Tasmania
    Posts
    155
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Whoops, I just realised I drew L1 and L2 backwards. Think of the arrows being pointed in the opposite directions, so there's tensile rather than compressive forces happening in the top section of the frame... The same logic still applies though.

    -Martin

  5. #55
    slug_burner is offline TopicToaster Gold Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    4,024
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by uninformed View Post
    I can visualise the flat bar being in tention between the head beam and table when pressing. But I would have thought that with the downward pressure on the table that below table height the FB to be under compression?

    Some Bolt info: John was saying that M20 is about the biggest you will commonly see in structural steel conections due to the fact that the guys installing it only have Podge and impact wrench to torque up. Going past M20 requires more torque and more equipment.

    M6 fine and coarse. I tried 2 local fastener suppliers, both saying that in M6 there is only one pitch. That being M6 x 1.0 metric coarse. Not that M6 metric fine does not exist, but that you can only buy bolts in M6 x 1.0...very few applications for M6 fine. Seems that there is a bigger range in UNC/UNF stuff than metric....
    Think of it this way, the weight of the press is pushing down on the floor, no matter how much pressure you put into the hydraulic actuator the press is not going to weigh any more. (ignoring the minor mass of additional fluid pumped into the actuator) Therefore there is no additional force transferred from below the table beam onto the uprights.

  6. #56
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Kiwiland
    Posts
    7,246
    Total Downloaded
    0
    It's just the opposite of trying to lift yourself by your shoe-laces. No matter how much you might strain your back, your weight on the ground doesn't change.

  7. #57
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Gold Coast
    Posts
    5,101
    Total Downloaded
    0
    ok, so there is an equalling out of the load on head beam and table? Weight thus far is approx:

    Ram 30kg
    ram plate 48kg
    4 x 250PFC 148kg
    4 x 100x16 Flat 104kg

    so already at 330 kg. While holes will reduce some weight, there will be more added...

  8. #58
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Brisbane, Inner East.
    Posts
    11,178
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by uninformed View Post
    I can visualise the flat bar being in tention between the head beam and table when pressing. But I would have thought that with the downward pressure on the table that below table height the FB to be under compression?

    Some Bolt info: John was saying that M20 is about the biggest you will commonly see in structural steel conections due to the fact that the guys installing it only have Podge and impact wrench to torque up. Going past M20 requires more torque and more equipment.

    M6 fine and coarse. I tried 2 local fastener suppliers, both saying that in M6 there is only one pitch. That being M6 x 1.0 metric coarse. Not that M6 metric fine does not exist, but that you can only buy bolts in M6 x 1.0...very few applications for M6 fine. Seems that there is a bigger range in UNC/UNF stuff than metric....
    Find a better bolt shop. Most suppliers only stock standard sizes. Just like taps and dies. They will tell you that such a size and pitch doesn't exist because it is not on the standard charts. I stock M6 x 0.75 and M6 x1.0. taps and dies. In some metric sizes there are as many as five pitches in use but the buggers don't stock the fasteners. Try some of the M7 & M9 commonly used in Japanese automotive applications. "Don't exist" you will be told. "No, then how come my Kawhonotasan is full of them." The unified national system is far better than metric in my opinion. Get some 3/4" or thicker Grade 5 or Grade 8 to replace that M20 construction rubbish.
    URSUSMAJOR

  9. #59
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Kiwiland
    Posts
    7,246
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I see no advantage in going finer than the standard M6x1mm. Don't make it harder for yourself.

  10. #60
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Brisbane, Inner East.
    Posts
    11,178
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I just checked the catalogue from my principal USA tool supplier. These are HSS taps and dies, not fasteners. They list three pitches in 6.0, five in 20, four each in 22, 24, 25. In UN they list six pitches in 1/4", eleven in 3/4", ten in 7/8", fourteen in 1".
    URSUSMAJOR

Page 6 of 12 FirstFirst ... 45678 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!