 Master
					
					
						Master
					
					
                                        
					
					
						 AT REST
					
					
						AT REST
					
					
                                        
					
					
						Irrespective of the writings of some Land Rover experts who maintain that these firewalls were produced when the "Rover" factory press broke down in 1949 (and the press may have broken down possibly on a couple of occasions) it is remarkable that:
1. There is no run of exclusively Aluminium / Steel fabricated firewalls when one would expect there to be a run (if the press broke down and production was continued). After all, up to hundreds of vehicles were assembled every week by the end of 80" production in 1953.
2. When an Aluminium / Steel fabricated firewall does turn up there are usually other vehicles in existence with vehicle numbers quite close that have standard pressed firewalls. Further, the few vehicles that have Aluminium / Steel fabricated firewalls span all the 1949/50/51/52/53 years of production - from a total of many tens of thousands of vehicles. So was the press breaking down all the time?
3. When the press may have broken down for the first time (1949) only a few months had elapsed from when ALL firewalls had been totally fabricated in steel sheet and some thicker sections (hinges, tops of A-posts, etc) for the first 1500 1948 models - Vehicle nos 860001 - 861500. So why on earth make a completely new design out of angle iron and other components? They already had a good design for a stopgap firewall. Even the bonnet hinges are bolted to the top edge of the firewall on the fabricated version.
4. These firewall have turned up all over the world in vehicles and also new old stock (NOS) ones have also surfaced here in Australia, Papua New Guinea and in British Military Stores disposals.
5. So - What is the explanation when there are effectively two versions of the Aluminium / Steel fabricated firewall - with and without sidelight position holes?
Pretty obviously they were/are a replacement part made AFTER the production of 80" vehicles ceased - most likely during the 1960s when any stock of original pressed firewalls was exhausted and 80" vehicles were needing firewalls owing to the cracking around the pressed area, accident damage or collision repair..........and rust!
Bob
Last edited by bobslandies; 14th August 2010 at 10:08 PM. Reason: forgot rust in the top boxed section and A-posts
According to John Smith's book, the die used in the press broke on four occasions, and each time alloy bulkheads were fabricated until it was repaired. The four occasions would perhaps explain the differences.
John
John
JDNSW
1986 110 County 3.9 diesel
1970 2a 109 2.25 petrol
 AT REST
					
					
						AT REST
					
					
                                        
					
					
						John,
I am not disputing the fact that the press may have broken down. John Smith's book is a marvellous contribution and like all books may stand corrected in some minor ways.
As I was careful to say there was already a fabricated firewall fitted to the first 1500 1948 models and there would have been tradesmen quite conversant with its production.
So the press breaks down and they make a more complex firewall that required lots of rivetting as opposed to simple folds and tack welding (the first 1500 firewalls have lots of tack welds rather than full runs). Anyway there would likely have been stockpiles of firewalls. There was also outsourcing even in those days - many parts for Land Rovers were made by other manufacturers.
However, to produce more than 15,000 vehicles in a year from the 1950 model (over 60 per day/5 day week) I would expect to see runs of the Aluminium / Steel fabricated firewalls for each alleged breadown.
The fact that there are many MORE vehicles with standard pressed firewalls around each of the few that have turned up - and some with close or consecutive numbers - points more to the later replacement part.
Also the NOS ones that exist - not many NOS pressed ones.
This area is now being researched as Charlie has said and the Series One Club and correspondents around the world are contributing a great deal of information that is calling into question some other "myths" about early Land Rovers.
Bob
You won't find me on: faceplant; Scipe; Infragam; LumpedIn; ShapCnat or Twitting. I'm just not that interesting.
what would be good would be a template to make the alloy firewall
(looks like lot of rivets!)
it would get a lot more landys rolling!!
cant wait to hear how the rest of this thread goes
(REMLR 235/MVCA 9) 80" -'49.(RUST), -'50 & '52. (53-parts) 88" -57 s1, -'63 -s2a -GS x 2-"Horrie"-112-769, "Vet"-112-429(-Vietnam-PRE 1ATF '65) ('66, s2a-as UN CIVPOL), Hans '73- s3 109" '56 s1 x2 77- s3 van (gone)& '12- 110
 YarnMaster
					
					
						YarnMaster
					
					
                                        
					
					
						Bob presents some compelling points and I must say the "broken press" story doesn't make any sense to me.
Where I work as a maintenance fitter the press also breaks down at regular intervals and as it is the only press, production comes to a complete halt. In our case it is all hands on deck until the blasted thing is repaired.
Rover of course would have had the same policy and lying in the heart of industrial England there would have been hundreds of businesses and tradesmen to call upon to fix the press. I find it hard to imagine that something so catastrophic happened to the press (on 4 occasions!) that it was deemed economically sound to start a slow and laborious hand-fabricated replacement programme.;or that the breakdown took so long to repair, given the skills and resources which abounded in those days!
Presses and dies, as we know, are immensely strong structures, so likely fail points can be limited to: electrics; hydraulics; or at the worst a wide-scale disaster such as fire, which would probably have destroyed more than the press and be well-known. The other two faults are relatively easy and quick to fix.
What is far more likely is that long after the 80" ceased to be produced, the dies were removed from the factory and destroyed/recycled; replacements then needed to be fabricated and as Bob points out they could have been made by any small fabrication shop in Britain as emergency replacement parts.
The press - being a very expensive piece of capital equipment and slow to wear - probably soldiered-on making new panels such as roofs for S1 and S2's ,
Cheers Charlie
The actual breakage is said to have been the die.
John
John
JDNSW
1986 110 County 3.9 diesel
1970 2a 109 2.25 petrol
 YarnMaster
					
					
						YarnMaster
					
					
                                        
					
					
						I did wonder about the die breaking, or being damaged but in light of Bob's points, it still doesn't make sense that there is no obvious run of aluminium bulkheads on consecutively numbered cars; or as Bob points out that a totally new design of bulkhead was fabricated, instead of reverting to the early version.
A broken die is a serious problem but even so I can imagine that within one week of hard-yakka it could be cobbled together to keep working, whilst the die makers made a new one if necessary.
Thanks for posting John,
Cheers Charlie
| Search AULRO.com ONLY! | Search All the Web! | 
|---|
|  |  | 
Bookmarks