Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Series 3 engine in series 1 landrover

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2023
    Location
    Port Lincoln
    Posts
    2
    Total Downloaded
    0

    Series 3 engine in series 1 landrover

    I Was going to get rid of a series 3 traytop, but was wondering if it was worth stripping the engine and gearbox, using them in a series 1 that had the holden 138 engine.
    Does anyone think this is worth doing?
    Thanks Ben.

  2. #2
    JDNSW's Avatar
    JDNSW is offline RoverLord Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    29,509
    Total Downloaded
    0
    In my view it would be, although it will depend to some extent on the condition of the Series 3 engine.
    John

    JDNSW
    1986 110 County 3.9 diesel
    1970 2a 109 2.25 petrol

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2023
    Location
    Port Lincoln
    Posts
    2
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by JDNSW View Post
    In my view it would be, although it will depend to some extent on the condition of the Series 3 engine.

    Thanks John,
    Should have said, it's a petrol 2.25L 4. Needs a little work, starts instantly and runs smooth with more power than I expected. However it does blow some smoke and has a tappet rattle.

    I was going to sell it and put the money into the older vehicle but the landrover engine is tempting (not that they ever had that engine).
    Regards,
    Ben.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    The Hills.
    Posts
    19,161
    Total Downloaded
    152.79 MB
    Well, the 138 is only a slightly bigger capacity than the 2.25 ( 2.26 ), and IIRC would be heavier than the Rover. Who knows, if you advertise the 138 on a Torana forum you might get a bob or two.
    ​JayTee

    Nullus Anxietus

    Cancer is gender blind.

    2000 D2 TD5 Auto: Tins
    1994 D1 300TDi Manual: Dave
    1980 SIII Petrol Tray: Doris
    OKApotamus #74
    Nanocom, D2 TD5 only.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Back down the hill.
    Posts
    29,767
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Tins View Post
    Well, the 138 is only a slightly bigger capacity than the 2.25 ( 2.26 ), and IIRC would be heavier than the Rover. Who knows, if you advertise the 138 on a Torana forum you might get a bob or two.
    Might be a grey motor.
    If you don't like trucks, stop buying stuff.
    http://www.aulro.com/afvb/signaturepics/sigpic20865_1.gif

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    The Hills.
    Posts
    19,161
    Total Downloaded
    152.79 MB
    Quote Originally Posted by V8Ian View Post
    Might be a grey motor.
    Well, yes, I suppose it might....... Might be worth a bob or two more if so.... Although not on a Torana forum.....
    ​JayTee

    Nullus Anxietus

    Cancer is gender blind.

    2000 D2 TD5 Auto: Tins
    1994 D1 300TDi Manual: Dave
    1980 SIII Petrol Tray: Doris
    OKApotamus #74
    Nanocom, D2 TD5 only.

  7. #7
    JDNSW's Avatar
    JDNSW is offline RoverLord Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    29,509
    Total Downloaded
    0
    The principal advantage of the Rover engine compared to the GM engine is that the Rover engine suits the gearing of the Series 1 (same as the Series 3) better and if used as intended, is more tolerant of operation on inclines, and the lubrication system is designed for prolonged use at low speed, which the Holden one is not. And it fits the engine space better.

    One thing to be aware of though is that the Series 1 bell housing is different to the Series 3 4 cylinder engine - you need one from a 2/2a if using the Series 1 clutch linkage. (and the bell housings differ according to the date of the box as the layshaft was changed - I think!)
    John

    JDNSW
    1986 110 County 3.9 diesel
    1970 2a 109 2.25 petrol

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Cooroy, QLD
    Posts
    1,396
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I have a series 1 with a 2.25l from a IIA and it's definitely a good idea. The only hurdle really is the alternator mount - the engine sits lower in the chassis rails than on a IIA or III so the alternator has to sit higher. I just made an adaptor bracket to lift it up a bit and it works fine.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    65
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I had my S1 re-rovered from a 186 red motor. Absolutely worth it (s2 2.25 put it). Sold the red motor and its gearbox too.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Yarrawonga, Vic
    Posts
    6,568
    Total Downloaded
    0
    The Holden Grey is a period conversion , not many around percapita, I'd be inclined to leave it.

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!