In the first pic the L/H fuel tank. Is the dipstick fuel guage a standard army part.? I have a 10 gallon L/R tank with one. Just wondering.......
[B][I]Andrew[/I][/B]
[COLOR="YellowGreen"][U]1958 Series II SWB - "Gus"[/U][/COLOR]
[COLOR="DarkGreen"][U]1965 Series IIA Ambulance 113-896 - "Ambrose"[/U][/COLOR]
[COLOR="#DAA520"][U]1981 Mercedes 300D[/U][/COLOR]
[U]1995 Defender 110[/U]
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
In the first pic the L/H fuel tank. Is the dipstick fuel guage a standard army part.? I have a 10 gallon L/R tank with one. Just wondering.......
 Fossicker
					
					
						Fossicker
					
					
                                        
					
					
						Hi all
thanks Mrs Ho Har for the registration form,
also, the fire truck my uncle bought for towing his boat, but needs wiring etc for the moment i beleive.
To groucho, yes i'm not sure, i thought that both tanks were meant to have dipsticks as my father's radio ex army 69 IIA has 2.
so you think both tanks came withouht dipsticks originally?
cheers
James
Army 2A's have duel tanks/dippers
 Fossicker
					
					
						Fossicker
					
					
                                        
					
					
						Hi all
I'm heading up to work on the car this weekend,
I was just wondering
where about would i look for all the relevant I.D. numbers on the car?
i.e.
Chassis no.
Engine no. (known)
Build no.
etc.
also i assume the military also had their own numbering system?
cheers
James
G'day Jameshuelin
Going by a quick look at the pics, It would probably be a GS,of about 68/9 and the military ID plate(Nomenclature Plate) will be between the wiper cover panel and the map light panel, and should read something like:
Truck utility 3/4ton Landrover 2a 109in WB,
Census:6028,
Chassis No253******and a letter "D" or onwards
Contract:C1******
Date ?/6?
The chassis Number will be stamped on the Left rear spring hanger mount just above the upper rear shackle pin--253****** should be the same as on the Nomenclature plate on the dash
I hope that is of some help,
P.S.I have a 1968 GS
 Fossicker
					
					
						Fossicker
					
					
                                        
					
					
						Hi Uncleho
that's very comprehensive, so i think i'll start from there and report back on sunday once i've gone up to see the car
thanks again
James
 Fossicker
					
					
						Fossicker
					
					
                                        
					
					
						Hi all (again)
I have just come across a 186 (holden) with engine mounts and adaptor plate to s3 gbox&transfer, it needs a fuel pump.
I was wondering,
-will it fit a IIA gbox
-is it a good 4x4 engine (i will use the car for trips, i.e. on road and dirt and sand, and fair 4x4ing)
-would the s3 gbox be better
-would it be a cheaper engine to run (parts and economy)
-are they a reliable engine
-i already have a 2.25L petrol in my landie in need of a rebuild, so would it be more sensible to find a fuel pump and transplant the engine to the landie? (as i have all the bits necessary)
cheers
James
 Fossicker
					
					
						Fossicker
					
					
                                        
					
					
						One more thing
If the engine fitted without panel modification into the s3 chassis, would it therefore fit into the sIIA chassis, also as the orig engine in the IIA is a 4cyl, the front xmember in the chassis will have to have a cutout fabricated in it? to fit the length of the new motor.
(also if i wasnt clear before the engine and adaptor plate also came with a s3 gbox and transfer case.
cheers (once again)
James
P.S. i also explained earlier i had farey O/D so i was also wondering along with the other pros/cons which engine was better for overdrive?
So basically overall which engine should i be using,haha
 YarnMaster
					
					
						YarnMaster
					
					
                                        
					
					
						Most people who have driven a Land Rover with a Rover engine and then another with a Holden engine, will never pick a Holden as a preferred engine I suspect.
In my case I found both the Holden conversions I drove: lacking in torque for off road use (especially sand); revved too high and always "felt stressed"; were not as easy or as pleasant to drive.
Other disadvantages:
1. Chassis needs modifying.
2. Increased fuel consumption (I suspect).
3. Starting handle cannot be used.
4. With the very cheap Rover spares available from the UK, no advantage in this dept.
5. Radiator will need modifying, etc.
6. Will most probably lower the appeal/value of the car at sale time.
In short the Rover engine is a superbly good one at the job it is designed to do; all of the parts for it are still available; is very strong and rugged and can tolerate all sorts of abuse such as over-heating.
My advice is to keep it, or purchase one,
Cheers Charlie
| Search AULRO.com ONLY! | Search All the Web! | 
|---|
|  |  | 
Bookmarks