Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 15 of 15

Thread: My engine fitting issue

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Narre Warren South
    Posts
    6,796
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Some conversions either removed, replaced or just cut away part of the front crossmember.
    Maybe the motor & gearbox were raised (at an angle) to fit the Holden motor without cutting the front crossmember.
    Still begs the question why raise the crossmember you had the problem with.......unless, as mentioned, it was to improve ground clearance.


    Colin
    '56 Series 1 with homemade welder
    '65 Series IIa Dormobile
    '70 SIIa GS
    '76 SIII 88" (Isuzu C240)
    '81 SIII FFR
    '95 Defender Tanami
    Motorcycles :-
    Vincent Rapide, Panther M100, Norton BIG4, Electra & Navigator, Matchless G80C, Suzuki SV650

  2. #12
    schuy1 Guest
    May be some 1 fabricated a new crossmember or bought a new 1 and thought it would be a good idea to raise it to help avoid the damage but failed to do the calculations? Was a motor and gearbox fitted when you acquired the car? Those cross members are easy to fab up, the old man did quite a few over the years for property owners around here.
    Cheers Scott

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    481
    Total Downloaded
    0
    The gearbox in pic no. 5 is not bolted in for the picture for doing the welding, it sits closer to the R.H side of the tunnel as you stated.

    The holden engine was already fitted when i got the car. no modification was done to the front cross member either, I thoguht I had got it in time before anything was changed.

    I would assume the old cross member was either rusted or damaged and they replaced it prior to fitting the holden engine, subsequently the holden engine was fitted to suit the raised cross member...I assume it would have made some funky knocking noises on either the cross member or tunnel under jerking operation!

    As i was removing the holden engine i remember thinking, "boy they didnt leave much wiggle room"

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Irymple, Victoria, Australia
    Posts
    2,902
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I would imagine wiggle room would have been very limited.
    Usually just the fact that a Holden motor is raised at the front to level the carburettor, means that the bell housing on the gearbox is very close to the transmission tunnel.


    Cheers, Mick.
    1974 S3 88 Holden 186.
    1971 S2A 88
    1971 S2A 109 6 cyl. tray back.
    1964 S2A 88 "Starfire Four" engine!
    1972 S3 88 x 2
    1959 S2 88 ARN 111-014
    1959 S2 88 ARN 111-556
    1988 Perentie 110 FFR ARN 48-728 steering now KLR PAS!
    REMLR 88
    1969 BSA Bantam B175

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    481
    Total Downloaded
    0
    If thats the case, then im sure the cross member would have been replaced after the engine was put in

    Quote Originally Posted by mick88 View Post
    I would imagine wiggle room would have been very limited.
    Usually just the fact that a Holden motor is raised at the front to level the carburettor, means that the bell housing on the gearbox is very close to the transmission tunnel.


    Cheers, Mick.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!