Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 25

Thread: Strongest Rover front axle combo for SIII.

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    NW Tassie
    Posts
    263
    Total Downloaded
    0

    Strongest Rover front axle combo for SIII.

    If I had access to any/all LR parts, what would the strongest bolt-in parts be for the front axle and diff center in my SWB?


    Cheers,
    Daryl.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    18,616
    Total Downloaded
    0
    A front salsbury out of a one tonne series 3 or a 101.

    Garry
    REMLR 243

    2007 Range Rover Sport TDV6
    1977 FC 101
    1976 Jaguar XJ12C
    1973 Haflinger AP700
    1971 Jaguar V12 E-Type Series 3 Roadster
    1957 Series 1 88"
    1957 Series 1 88" Station Wagon

  3. #3
    JDNSW's Avatar
    JDNSW is offline RoverLord Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    29,517
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by garrycol View Post
    A front salsbury out of a one tonne series 3 or a 101.

    Garry
    The 101 would not be bolt in, but I agree about the axle from the One Ton (not one tonne), preferably the Salisbury not the ENV. Pity they were never sold in Australia and are scarce as hen's teeth anywhere!

    Unless you are doing something pretty outrageous I have not known front axles to be a particular weakness since they started putting reinforcing on the housings on 109s about the start of 2a production.

    John
    John

    JDNSW
    1986 110 County 3.9 diesel
    1970 2a 109 2.25 petrol

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    East-South-East Girt-By-Sea
    Posts
    17,662
    Total Downloaded
    1.20 MB
    The strongest standard (easily available) parts are the SIII 109 front axles with the 24 spline drive flanges. the 101 while strong, are 4" too wide for a standard SIII.

    Have you been breaking front axles on your 88"? It's quite an unusual occurrence if you do.

    You won't find me on: faceplant; Scipe; Infragam; LumpedIn; ShapCnat or Twitting. I'm just not that interesting.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    WA
    Posts
    13,786
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Strongest bolt-in that replaces current axle housing - SIII one-ton front salisbury.

    Strongest bolt-in that retains existing axle housing:
    30-spline axles from here: Extreme duty axles
    A hypoid diff centre from here: Jack McNamara - Differential Specialists


    Quote Originally Posted by Lotz-A-Landies View Post
    the 101 while strong, are 4" too wide for a standard SIII.
    I think you mean 10"

    From memory:
    Series 2/3 Axles are ~55" WMS-WMS
    Coiler Axles are ~61" WMS-WMS
    FC101 Axles are ~65" WMS-WMS

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    East-South-East Girt-By-Sea
    Posts
    17,662
    Total Downloaded
    1.20 MB
    Quote Originally Posted by isuzurover View Post
    Strongest bolt-in that replaces current axle housing - SIII one-ton front salisbury.
    <snip>
    I think you mean 10"

    From memory:
    Series 2/3 Axles are ~55" WMS-WMS
    Coiler Axles are ~61" WMS-WMS
    FC101 Axles are ~65" WMS-WMS
    As I said easiest available - only about 1/2 of the SIII 1 Ton production had Salisbury front axles - the remainder had standard SIII 109 axle assemblies. So acquiring an original 1 ton front Salisbury in Oz would be a feat in itself.

    I was not aware that the 101 track was 65" I always believed the 101 to have about 60" track (only slightly wider than the 59" of the SIIB - teven the 101 Ambulance body is only 69" wide and the wheels look more than 2" inset from the body on those.)



    The Perentie 6X6 have a track somewhere around 65"

    You won't find me on: faceplant; Scipe; Infragam; LumpedIn; ShapCnat or Twitting. I'm just not that interesting.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    NW Tassie
    Posts
    263
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Well, you ppl have just bowled me over. I wouldn't have even imagined the amount I Don't know about Landies after those replies. I have a Lot to learn, but the journey is terrific.
    Will the Salisbury shorten the front prop shaft length? Would I just swap to the one ton prop shaft if it does need to be shorter?
    This will kill the proverbial two birds, as I want to upgrade the front brakes as well.

    Quote Lotz-A-Landies .... "Have you been breaking front axles on your 88"? It's quite an unusual occurrence if you do."
    No, Diana. It hasn't turned a wheel in anger yet. Just that I have access to the parts and at the same time, want to upgrade the brakes.



    Cheers,
    Daryl.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    WA
    Posts
    13,786
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by circlework View Post
    Well, you ppl have just bowled me over. I wouldn't have even imagined the amount I Don't know about Landies after those replies. I have a Lot to learn, but the journey is terrific.
    Will the Salisbury shorten the front prop shaft length? Would I just swap to the one ton prop shaft if it does need to be shorter?
    This will kill the proverbial two birds, as I want to upgrade the front brakes as well.

    Quote Lotz-A-Landies .... "Have you been breaking front axles on your 88"? It's quite an unusual occurrence if you do."
    No, Diana. It hasn't turned a wheel in anger yet. Just that I have access to the parts and at the same time, want to upgrade the brakes.



    Cheers,
    Daryl.
    Daryl, I am curious. As there are (officially) no One-Ton's in AU, how can you have "access to the parts"???

    However - yes - the propshaft is about 3-4" shorter. Not sure if the helical T-case in the one-ton has the output in the same position - so not sure if the one-ton prop will fit.

    It is fairly easy to turn a rear sals into a front one if you know a competent welder/machinist. You will notice the grader blade effect of a front sals offroad if you are running anything smaller than a 9.00x16 (36")


    Quote Originally Posted by Lotz-A-Landies View Post
    I was not aware that the 101 track was 65" I always believed the 101 to have about 60" track(only slightly wider than the 59" of the SIIB - teven the 101 Ambulance body is only 69" wide and the wheels look more than 2" inset from the body on those.)
    I am talking WMS-WMS measurements (Wheel Mounting Surface). These are not the same as track with as track depends on the rims. Plenty of vehicles have negative offset so the track width is less than the WMS measurement.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    NW Tassie
    Posts
    263
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Lotz-A-Landies View Post
    As is said easiest available - only about 1/2 of the SIII 1 Ton production had Salisbury front axles - the remainder had standard SIII 109 axle assemblies. So acquiring an original 1 ton front Salisbury in Oz would be a feat in itself.
    OH, then how about the stage one with the cv joints or are the cv's the weak link?



    Cheers,
    Daryl.


    ps. You folks can type too fast!

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    NW Tassie
    Posts
    263
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by isuzurover View Post
    Daryl, I am curious. As there are (officially) no One-Ton's in AU, how can you have "access to the parts"???

    Sorry isuzurover, my bad. I'll go back to the original post ... ie; 'if I had access to'



    Thanks

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!