Page 4 of 10 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 96

Thread: Series III SWB Soft Top Rear Seats - Advice Needed

  1. #31
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Adelaide
    Posts
    2,757
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Alistair View Post
    Thanks Mick

    ... Personally I can't think why you would specify a hard top without air-con in Australia but that is another question. Perhaps it wasn't the done thing if you could afford a Land Rover at the time....
    .
    I think that the security issue stops a lot of this. Lots of people who are purchasing ADF 109's are converting to hard top.

    I agree with you though, soft top will be way better.

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Irymple, Victoria, Australia
    Posts
    2,902
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Check with the Hohars on here as they have a Series 3 88" soft top registered in Qld.
    It may have rear seats.


    Cheers, Mick.
    1974 S3 88 Holden 186.
    1971 S2A 88
    1971 S2A 109 6 cyl. tray back.
    1964 S2A 88 "Starfire Four" engine!
    1972 S3 88 x 2
    1959 S2 88 ARN 111-014
    1959 S2 88 ARN 111-556
    1988 Perentie 110 FFR ARN 48-728 steering now KLR PAS!
    REMLR 88
    1969 BSA Bantam B175

  3. #33
    JDNSW's Avatar
    JDNSW is offline RoverLord Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    29,521
    Total Downloaded
    0
    As early as the 1960s Australians were buying lwb four wheel drives for almost all purposes. And these were, by then, tending to tray backs for utility use (probably as forklifts started to become generally available for loading at the rural store), unless security was necessary, when a hardtop was specified.

    If it was intended to carry passengers, either side seats in a lwb hardtop, as in the FJ45 troopie, or the 109 wagon (although by Series 3 time, it would mostly have been a Landcruiser if passengers were in mind).

    Soft tops, either long or short, lost favour in Australia in the 1960s, probably because of their relatively short life in Australian conditions, high cost of replacement, and lack of security, together with increasing disposable income meant that the cost difference was less important. Another factor may have been the noise when travelling at increasing highway speeds and dust ingress.

    The final refuge of the swb rag top was the farm runabout - without rear seats. And this function was largely replaced by the Suzuki 4x4 and then four wheel motorbikes.

    John
    John

    JDNSW
    1986 110 County 3.9 diesel
    1970 2a 109 2.25 petrol

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Irymple, Victoria, Australia
    Posts
    2,902
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Now that you have reminded me John. Suzuki soft tops were available with a rear seat. I recall a couple of friends who had Suzuki Sieras in the 1980's, and they were fitted with forward facing rear seats. So the series 3 soft top would been in the category. Cheers, Mick.
    1974 S3 88 Holden 186.
    1971 S2A 88
    1971 S2A 109 6 cyl. tray back.
    1964 S2A 88 "Starfire Four" engine!
    1972 S3 88 x 2
    1959 S2 88 ARN 111-014
    1959 S2 88 ARN 111-556
    1988 Perentie 110 FFR ARN 48-728 steering now KLR PAS!
    REMLR 88
    1969 BSA Bantam B175

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Western Victoria
    Posts
    14,101
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by mick88 View Post
    Now that you have reminded me John. Suzuki soft tops were available with a rear seat. I recall a couple of friends who had Suzuki Sieras in the 1980's, and they were fitted with forward facing rear seats. So the series 3 soft top would been in the category. Cheers, Mick.
    And Mokes

  6. #36
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Sorrento, Perth
    Posts
    113
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by mick88 View Post
    Now that you have reminded me John. Suzuki soft tops were available with a rear seat. I recall a couple of friends who had Suzuki Sieras in the 1980's, and they were fitted with forward facing rear seats. So the series 3 soft top would been in the category. Cheers, Mick.

    Quote Originally Posted by Mick_Marsh View Post
    And Mokes

    I had that conversation with the DoT chap and he acknowledged the point, both about the Suzuki and the Moke, but said that because they were built like that it was fine... but SWB Series IIIs were never supplied to the Australian market as soft tops with seats in the back, which means that I can't do it now.

    Which really brings me back to the crux of the issue which is that I need some sort of official record or document to demonstrate that the Series III was marketed by Land Rover as a soft top in Aus with inwards facing bench seats.

    I can do this for the 109, because the ADF had over 2000 of them. I can also do it for the Series IIa SWB because the ADF had lots of those as well. The problem is that the ADF didn't have any Series III 88s in this configuration so the best source of records doesn't apply. (Actually I believe that they may have had 6 SWB Series IIIs for trials purposes, but I can't find any official records about this, nor determine if they were fitted with rear seats).

    I may be able to blag it with the man from the DoT, show him the evidence from the ADF about the 109 and try to steer him towards the idea that it applied to 88s as well. That is certainly what I will try if I can't find a single example of soft top SWB in the records.

  7. #37
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Sorrento, Perth
    Posts
    113
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Mick_Marsh View Post
    And Mokes
    As a matter of interest, do you happen to know how Mokes are classed in Australia on the registration documents?

    Are they 'UTE' or something else?

  8. #38
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Western Victoria
    Posts
    14,101
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Alistair View Post
    As a matter of interest, do you happen to know how Mokes are classed in Australia on the registration documents?

    Are they 'UTE' or something else?
    My Victorian registered ones are Body Type: UTIL
    Even the four seater (which I no longer own).

    The other four seater I have is SA registered. Body Type is listed as: TOURER.

    PM me you email address.

  9. #39
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Bunbury, WA
    Posts
    2,507
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Alistair View Post
    As a matter of interest, do you happen to know how Mokes are classed in Australia on the registration documents?

    Are they 'UTE' or something else?
    My Moke is WA registered as a 2 seat UTE even though it has 4 seats using factory seats and seatbelt mountings. I possibly now regret not forcing this issue more vigorously when I registered it recently. Watching your progress with interest!!

  10. #40
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Irymple, Victoria, Australia
    Posts
    2,902
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Mick_Marsh View Post
    My Victorian registered ones are Body Type: UTIL
    Even the four seater (which I no longer own).

    The other four seater I have is SA registered. Body Type is listed as: TOURER.

    PM me you email address.

    "TOURER" is/was a soft top/convertible sedan with four doors and seating for four or more passengers.


    Cheers, Mick.
    1974 S3 88 Holden 186.
    1971 S2A 88
    1971 S2A 109 6 cyl. tray back.
    1964 S2A 88 "Starfire Four" engine!
    1972 S3 88 x 2
    1959 S2 88 ARN 111-014
    1959 S2 88 ARN 111-556
    1988 Perentie 110 FFR ARN 48-728 steering now KLR PAS!
    REMLR 88
    1969 BSA Bantam B175

Page 4 of 10 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!