Oh dear this forum is starting to get like the silly old farts forum that is ExploreOz
Yes LR thought the brakes were not up to it and put restrictors in to cut back engine performance. Since then we have all found out the brakes are fine and removing the restrictors is not an issue - improving performance and fuel consumption a little - not a lot.
Remember the 101 has the same brakes and drivetrain and its engine was not restricted.
Also the OP is very familiar with Stage 1s as he has another with a stroked engine and standard brakes and full well knows these vehicles.
Garry
REMLR 243
2007 Range Rover Sport TDV6
1977 FC 101
1976 Jaguar XJ12C
1973 Haflinger AP700
1971 Jaguar V12 E-Type Series 3 Roadster
1957 Series 1 88"
1957 Series 1 88" Station Wagon
And wheel size and tfr case ratio.
REMLR 243
2007 Range Rover Sport TDV6
1977 FC 101
1976 Jaguar XJ12C
1973 Haflinger AP700
1971 Jaguar V12 E-Type Series 3 Roadster
1957 Series 1 88"
1957 Series 1 88" Station Wagon
Last edited by wpalmo; 4th September 2018 at 07:11 AM. Reason: spelling mistake
"Any intelligent fool can make things bigger and more complex....It takes a touch of genius and a lot of courage to move in the opposite direction."
Albert Einstein.
That is a work of art!! Thanks for the post, Im looking for power and plenty of it, how does yours go with the 3.9? Ive got another stage one thats been taken out to 4.2 and it leaves this latest one for dead, but the new one is running 750/16s and Range Rover high range ratios so not sure if it hasn't got the `punch` for this reason? ..Yes Garry Im surprised that the Narks have found this forum..If I want to drive a V8 ute, I want it to go like one and sound like one..no ones else business really!!
I'd like to compare wpalmo's 3.9 to the 4.4l in my stage 1. I'm certainly happy with how mine moves along and the noise..... 🤪
Standard carbs with a 3.9 block and standard gearing.
YouTube
| Search AULRO.com ONLY! |
Search All the Web! |
|---|
|
|
|
Bookmarks