Just providing an update on all of those following this thread.
Got the new inlet valves and have installed them in the head. Had my machine shop confirm that the deck of the head was flat and was in spec. Had new valve guides pressed in and was able to get 6 of the guides that have the o-ring recess in the guide itself. As a reminder, the inlet guides in my head had liners pressed into them so no place for o-rings. So the head is back together and ready to be installed.
Cylinder #6 has been honed to remove any glazing although I didn't see any glazing when I used my borescope to inspect. I had a set of rings that Cox & Turner provided that have a better fit not only between the cylinder wall and piston but also a better fit (more snug) in the gap. New piston rings (two new compression rings) have been installed. I was advised by Cox & Turner to use the existing oil scraper rings that I have been using on all the cylinders. As a reminder, the piston rings that I originally installed after the rebuild were allowing lots of oil to pass through the rings gaps and get into the cylinder. Also, the gaps were perfectly aligned when I removed the head and cylinder for further inspection. This is normal for the pistons to move around when the engine is running, but it's not all that common, according to the engine builders I've discussed this with, for all the ring gaps to align and stick there.
Upon further inspecting of the exhaust valves, I found that the #6 exhaust valve was damaged. It was very hard to see, but once I cleaned all the burned on oil and fuel muck off (see pics) I could see, although not visibly obvious, that the #6 exhaust valve was not round. I'm not sure if in the past the valve had come in contact with the piston, or a damaged valve was used as a replacement as a bush fix...not sure, but it was not round. When I shined a light up through the exhaust port I could see light between the valve and the seat. This is probably where most of my issues were coming from. Certainly the compression issues. I'm surprised by this as these were inspected during my disassembly process when I was rebuilding the engine and by my machine shop when I took them the block and engine parts for inspections. Since the engine was completely disassembled, I'm surprised this wasn't found by them. Either way, I'm responsible and I missed it too. This makes sense now and is very consistent with the original leak down test and compression tests results I did when I first got the truck and #6 was by far the lowest.
I am waiting on new exhaust valves and hopefully they will be here prior to Christmas.
In the mean time, I have prepped the engine, removed the radiator, and timing cover and fabricated a tool to extract the exhaust valve rocker shaft in order to get to the #6 valve spring so that I can remove the exhaust valve. It doesn't appear that the #6 valve seat has been damaged as it appears smooth to the touch and all images from my borescope look good.
Shout out to 1950Landy for the drawings of the extractor tool. Made one this afternoon using a piece of 3/8 inch all thread and a #4 Easy Out Stud extractor.
After all of the inspection and testing (compression, smoke and leak down) I feel like I have found all the issues. And it appears, even though the #6 cylinder was firing, the compression was so low that it was not providing much power at all. Can't wait to see how this engine runs with 6 well performing cylinders.
More to come, but have included a few pics of the mucked up #6 valve and the tool for extracting the exhaust valve rocker shaft.
IMG_0018.jpgIMG_0022.jpgIMG_0026.jpgIMG_6307.jpgIMG_6308.jpgIMG_6309.jpg



Reply With Quote

I'm sure once they added on all the kit, especially the brush bars mine came with, and tools (the jerry can bases bolted to the back must weigh 40 lbs each) and extra wheels, etc. I bet they were quite sluggish. But stripped of all that and they're not that bad!!!

Bookmarks