
Originally Posted by
SlowRide
Is there a reason why you don't see Commodore V6's slotted under Series rides at all? After a bit of thought it'd seem to be the perfect upgrade - plentiful, cheap, simple, reliable, powerful, light, small footprint...
What's the catch?
I suspect you will find that the shape of the torque curve is quite unsuitable for the gearing. Also probably a bit uncertain how they would stand up to off road use (angle of tilt, lack of cooling air).
The Series 2/2a (and 3) Landrover has the advantage that the engine is, as far as I am aware, the only engine that has ever been specifically designed from a clean sheet for a utility four wheel drive. In both petrol and diesel versions, it is tractable, durable, and for its vintage reliable, and stands up to abuse better than most. The vehicle does, however, require more maintenance than do modern vehicles, but on the other hand, is designed for owner maintenance and repair. (Unlike all modern vehicles!)
In my over fifty years experience of driving Series Landrovers, I see most, if not all, problems arise from either lack of maintenance or abuse (including overloading), and have not seen them as noticeably less reliable than, for example, Hiluxes.
However, the most recent 2a is at least forty years old, and the design is nearly sixty years old, so it is unreasonable to expect reliability unless you can restore them to something close to original condition - and you will need to keep in mind the design limitations and maintenance requirements.
John
John
JDNSW
1986 110 County 3.9 diesel
1970 2a 109 2.25 petrol
Bookmarks