Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Fuel Consumption 2a Petrol

  1. #1
    JDNSW's Avatar
    JDNSW is offline RoverLord Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    29,510
    Total Downloaded
    0

    Fuel Consumption 2a Petrol

    I took advantage of the trip to the Expo to check the fuel consumption on the Series 2a 109 petrol.

    Driving both ways to Castle Hill, with the front hubs unlocked, keeping pretty close to the speed limit where possible, I avoided using the overdrive going to Castle Hill and used it where it seemed a good idea on the way back (mostly splitting the ratio between 3 and 4). Distance close to exactly 350km.

    Fuel consumption was 16l/100km on the way there, 17.8 on the way back. I think the main reason for the difference was the headwind.

    Before the trip I ensured all wheel bearings were correctly adjusted and that no brakes were dragging at all.

    John
    John

    JDNSW
    1986 110 County 3.9 diesel
    1970 2a 109 2.25 petrol

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Sydney SW
    Posts
    151
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Thanks John
    For that fuel usage information. As I was wondering what kms I may expect out of a 10 gallon tank from my 2a, as I am taking it on the Land Rover Outback Heritage Drive. Looks like I will need to carry some extra fuel.

    Mike

  3. #3
    JDNSW's Avatar
    JDNSW is offline RoverLord Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    29,510
    Total Downloaded
    0
    You could expect to get a bit better if you keep the speed down (much of the trip was at 100kph), and less aggressive tyres than mine would help, although these were at 35psi, well above book figures. Having an 8:1 head instead of my 7:1 would also help. And of course, the engine should be in tune (mine is).

    John
    John

    JDNSW
    1986 110 County 3.9 diesel
    1970 2a 109 2.25 petrol

  4. #4
    numpty's Avatar
    numpty is offline TopicToaster Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Nundle
    Posts
    4,077
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Interesting figures John. About the same as we used to get out of our V8 Stage 1. Our S11A (SW on the trip to Corowa achieved around 14l/100. As you say, speed alters the figures and most of our travelling was done at 70 to 80kph, as we find this to be the most comfortable.
    Numpty

    Thomas - 1955 Series 1 107" Truck Cab
    Leon - 1957 Series 1 88" Soft Top
    Lewis - 1963 Series 11A ex Mil Gunbuggy
    Teddy5 - 2001 Ex Telstra Big Cab Td5
    ​Betsy - 1963 Series 11A ex Mil GS
    REMLR No 143

  5. #5
    JDNSW's Avatar
    JDNSW is offline RoverLord Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    29,510
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by numpty View Post
    Interesting figures John. About the same as we used to get out of our V8 Stage 1. Our S11A (SW on the trip to Corowa achieved around 14l/100. As you say, speed alters the figures and most of our travelling was done at 70 to 80kph, as we find this to be the most comfortable.
    Yes, speed makes a big difference, and I expect the strong wind made quite a difference too - it was a crosswind for most of the trip to sydney and about half the trip back, requiring a good quarter turn of the wheel to go straight, and then pretty much a headwind for most of the rest of the trip home, with wind speeds mostly 60+kph.

    John
    John

    JDNSW
    1986 110 County 3.9 diesel
    1970 2a 109 2.25 petrol

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Queenscliff, Victoria
    Posts
    89
    Total Downloaded
    0

    Post

    I've calculated the fuel consumption for the last trip up to Cameron Corner (2000 miles) and an earlier one this year to Bourke/Darling River Run (1400 miles) and found in both cases I averaged out to 15L/100KM.

    On both of these trips, fueld consumption on the highways was a fair bit higher than when on unsealed roads. With around 25-30% better consumption off road. On both trips about 1/2 was on unsealed roads/tracks.

    With the roof top tent, Arthur has a pretty high profile and really struggles in a headwind, barely able to get to 70kph and happier to sit on 65kph in these types of conditions. In a headwind the overdrive is unusable, just not enough power. We're also loaded up with extra fuel, water and gear so not extactly light. Fair to say we don't overtake too many others on the road.

    Yet on unsealed tracks consumption was great. Speeds were typically below 60kph, and a reasonable amount of 3rd gear work too.

    I've reconditioned the carbie (and fuel pump), so I figure that might be a positive factor.

    When I remember, I also put in Morey's Upper Cylinder Lubricant. But that doesn't appear to factor much in consumption from what I can tell.

  7. #7
    DRM Guest

    Question carbie/fuel consumption

    G'day, I am building up a 2A 88" and am in delemma about which carbie to stick on. does anyone have any ideas on performance vs economy for various carbs? Dave

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Morpeth NSW
    Posts
    782
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Hey Dave,

    Will you be taking your car offroad much? If so, it would be hard to go past the Zenith...

  9. #9
    numpty's Avatar
    numpty is offline TopicToaster Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Nundle
    Posts
    4,077
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Although we have a Solex on ours, general consensus seems to favour the Zenith. This is a conundrum I face, as the Solex needs attention, but I also have a Zenith which I could rebuild.
    Numpty

    Thomas - 1955 Series 1 107" Truck Cab
    Leon - 1957 Series 1 88" Soft Top
    Lewis - 1963 Series 11A ex Mil Gunbuggy
    Teddy5 - 2001 Ex Telstra Big Cab Td5
    ​Betsy - 1963 Series 11A ex Mil GS
    REMLR No 143

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Cedar Grove SE QLD
    Posts
    776
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I would go a Zentih it has less parts so in theroy should less to go wrong, also there not as compliacted as a Solex.
    The Zentih also flows more CFM then a Solex as it has a better disign.

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!