I would go for the mildest, ie 3.5 low comp.
Many recommend the 3.9 injection but in your case I believe low rev torque would be the priority, as the 3.9 injection give smore top end therefore less bottom end.
Regards Philip A
I've found a good deal on an ebay camshaft/lifter/timing chain/gasket package from the UK ($180 AUD plus postage). Can post a link if anyone's interested.
There is a choice of 4 cams:
1. 3.9 EFI
2. 3.5 EFI
3. 3.5 carb low compression (listed for early RR classic)
4. 3.5 carb high compression.
No specs for the cams are listed, presumably they are stock profiles.
The engine is in a 110 and is(was) a carbed 3.5 which has been stroked and bored to 4.3 litres. Twin SU HIF's and lpg. I dont know what the compression ratio is but it would have to be higher than a low compression 3.5...... I'm looking for max torque,smoothness and driveablility, between idle and 4000 rpm. If its relevant, with the current gearing/tyres its doing 2600 rpm at 100 km/h in top. I may go to 33's down the track which would drop the cruising revs by a couple of hundred rpm.
Which of the above is likely to be the best for my application?
I would go for the mildest, ie 3.5 low comp.
Many recommend the 3.9 injection but in your case I believe low rev torque would be the priority, as the 3.9 injection give smore top end therefore less bottom end.
Regards Philip A
How often do you run petrol? If you only run lpg then id go for the efi cam - but get rid of the carb manifold and fit a late model efi / throttle body setup.
"What are the characteristics of the efi cam which make it better with lpg?"
Now I would be extremely interested in that answer !!! Im amazed that you can "pick a cam" without knowing its specification . By simply advancing or retarding the cam I can totally change the Characteristics . By the way the trick with LPG is VE%
G'day Mark2,
I recently installed a pre-pollution camshaft from an early Range Rover into my 3.5L County that runs on LPG, and i reckon it is a fantastic cam that provides lots of low down torque yet still performs very well on the highway. I talked a bit about it in this thread:
V8 Camshaft
On a side note, how do you find the power and torque of your bored and stroked V8 compared to when it was originally a 3.5L?
Edward![]()
The thing is with the efi cam - its tuned for the efi manifold. I'm not sure that it would be any better with lpg for any other reason. But LPG is a lot more forgiving with these things like weird cams, massive carbs or throttle bodies as the lpg won't drop out of the flow like little petrol droplets will.
AFAIK - the holden efi 202 cam was very similar specs to the xu1 cam - but worked a lot lower down in the rev range. The efi 202 was probably the torquiest low down holden six. Purley because of the cam and tuned length manifold working together.
Sounds like another vote for the low compression carb cam!
I had no experience of this particular engine before it was modified however it is noticeably better torquewise than other 3.5's I have owned. The stroke was increased from 71 to 85mm.
I run Range Rover transfer gears in the LT95 with 31's and the gearing feels just right. It will go down to walking pace in high 3rd without pig-rooting and pull away to 100km/h cleanly.
It runs out of breath at about 4000 rpm (100 in 3rd) but that is probably largely to do with my restrictive intake setup (lpg mixers and complicated air cleaner plumbing)
Main reason for replacing this one is lifter noise and a suspicion the current cam is a little 'warm', the potential of which I'm not realising due to the restrictive intake - I think there is even more torque potential with a very mild cam.
| Search AULRO.com ONLY! |
Search All the Web! |
|---|
|
|
|
Bookmarks