Page 8 of 15 FirstFirst ... 678910 ... LastLast
Results 71 to 80 of 150

Thread: 3.9 to 5.0 litre

  1. #71
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    14,147
    Total Downloaded
    99.87 MB
    Quote Originally Posted by RoverP6B View Post
    PhilipA wrote,..

    Hello Philip,

    Did not the 3.9 have more problems than the 4.6? I seem to recall it did. The 4.0 was by far the worst in terms of cracking, but it all boiled down to radiator hoses bursting and engines overheating. I dare say any engine allowed to experience such will come off second best.

    Once the Rover block be it a 3.9, 4.0 or 4.6 is top hatted, then the problems are over. The Tempest engines from 1994 till 1999 or so were more prone to experiencing liner problems than the later Thor engines, so it is my understanding.

    Ron.
    The casting methods used by Rover were fine for 3.5's but not accurate enough for the motors with bigger bores. The bores that were produced and measured with the most thickness went to the 4.6 and the thinner ones went to the 4.0. This is as I understand it why the 4.0 is more prone to cracking, but all of them are in the same boat.
    Cheers
    Slunnie


    ~ Discovery II Td5 ~ Discovery 3dr V8 ~ Series IIa 6cyl ute ~ Series II V8 ute ~

  2. #72
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    259
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Slunnie wrote,..
    The casting methods used by Rover were fine for 3.5's but not accurate enough for the motors with bigger bores. The bores that were produced and measured with the most thickness went to the 4.6 and the thinner ones went to the 4.0. This is as I understand it why the 4.0 is more prone to cracking, but all of them are in the same boat.
    Hello Slunnie,

    Yes I agree. From what I have heard, the new blocks being produced by Cosworth are much better in this regard. No cracking problem....so far..

    Ron.

  3. #73
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    336
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Fish78 View Post
    In the words of the Prosche Cayenne ad...
    Quote Originally Posted by Fish78 View Post

    If you have to ask why you need 450BHP to drop the kids off at school your not thinking hard enough..lol
    Put 450hp into a rangie and the only things you'll drop are the diff centers

  4. #74
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Safety Bay
    Posts
    8,041
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I'm with big guy on this one,it's not that there is anything wrong with a holden V8 but after buying all the parts to make it fit and an engine you don't get much bang for your buck.I'd still go a 4.6 and spend the money I would have spent on adapter kits etc top hatting the block and doing a few performance mods and be happy with it.Putting more power through drivetrains not made for it just causes headaches,the brakes aren't good enough for a stock 4.6 for starters. pat

  5. #75
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Adelaide
    Posts
    399
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by RoverP6B View Post
    Slunnie wrote,..

    Hello Slunnie,

    Yes I agree. From what I have heard, the new blocks being produced by Cosworth are much better in this regard. No cracking problem....so far..

    Ron.
    Not so sure about that. V8 Developments report cases of Cosworth blocks having the same cracking issues. This was mentioned earlier this year on the TVR, BritishV8 and RangeRovers.net forums.

    The only sure permanent fix is top hatting, but once done the RV8 will go on for years with no problems in this regard. And if you do the right thing with tuning, it can produce some very respectable power to weight figures.

  6. #76
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Yinnar South, Vic
    Posts
    9,943
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Slunnie View Post
    Did you mean the 6L80E or the 4L80E?

    Just googling around. The 6L80E was in the VE Commodores and WM Statesmans with the 6 litre V8's. The 4L80E in the Suburbans as previous said.
    4L80E, don't think you'd need 6 ratios....plus the 4L80 adaptor is available to LT230

    Advocates of the Rover V8 must remember, just because they did it (i.e fitted 4.6), doesn't mean they have too knock the alternative options, why poo poo something you obviously know **** all about, have never tried?? I love for an answer

    Rover V8 heads can NOT support large capacites effeciently, so your scrwed from there, the last LS1 GU patrol I wired, has a baby camshaft, valve springs 3" single exhaust and a Mafless tune, it made 260HP on 35" tyres, and will return 15-16L/100, let me see your aftermarket ECUd rover stroker do that on 36's

    Why convert? stock engine, with a substantial power incease, an ECU with closed loop, timing control, transmission control and you can plug it in at any holden/efi live/LS1 edit tuner

  7. #77
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    336
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by rovercare View Post
    4L80E, don't think you'd need 6 ratios....plus the 4L80 adaptor is available to LT230

    Advocates of the Rover V8 must remember, just because they did it (i.e fitted 4.6), doesn't mean they have too knock the alternative options, why poo poo something you obviously know **** all about, have never tried?? I love for an answer

    Rover V8 heads can NOT support large capacites effeciently, so your scrwed from there, the last LS1 GU patrol I wired, has a baby camshaft, valve springs 3" single exhaust and a Mafless tune, it made 260HP on 35" tyres, and will return 15-16L/100, let me see your aftermarket ECUd rover stroker do that on 36's

    Why convert? stock engine, with a substantial power incease, an ECU with closed loop, timing control, transmission control and you can plug it in at any holden/efi live/LS1 edit tuner
    so an LS1 is the same as a 308

    Just poohing ya,

    the question is - do you think the 308 is a better swap for a propper built 4.6 or 3.9?

  8. #78
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Adelaide - Torrens Park
    Posts
    7,291
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Not better, not worse, just different.

  9. #79
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Yinnar South, Vic
    Posts
    9,943
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Hardchina View Post


    so an LS1 is the same as a 308

    Just poohing ya,

    the question is - do you think the 308 is a better swap for a propper built 4.6 or 3.9?
    No a 308 isn't a worthwhile conversion, but a fuel injected 304 is or better yet a 5.7 or 6.0l

    I have a rebuilder 308 here, with all adaptions to suit LT95 if you wanna buy it

  10. #80
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    336
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by rovercare View Post
    No a 308 isn't a worthwhile conversion, but a fuel injected 304 is or better yet a 5.7 or 6.0l

    I have a rebuilder 308 here, with all adaptions to suit LT95 if you wanna buy it
    Na.... but if you have a 4b1t and Lt85 sitting around looking for a new host ......

Page 8 of 15 FirstFirst ... 678910 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!